Modern Antisemitism Is The Quiet Exclusion Of Jewish Voices
Credit: Alyssa Rosenheck

DW Opinion

Modern Antisemitism Is The Quiet Exclusion Of Jewish Voices

The new book bans don't need burning.

Alyssa Rosenheck
Listen
Listen
9 min

Most people think persecution begins with laws. It doesn’t. It begins with pressure.

It starts when institutions learn that standing with Jews costs more than excluding them. Long before governments write discrimination into law, culture normalizes it. Long before rights are stripped away, voices are quietly pushed out of mainstream life.

I know this firsthand.

On August 20, Bell Bird Books in Nashville, Tennessee, was set to host the launch of my second book, “White. Blonde. Jew.: A Call to End Extremism, Speak Up, Reclaim Center.” This wasn’t a store that reluctantly agreed to carry me. The owner invited me. She read the manuscript and texted me afterward that it was “spot on,” “incredibly brave,” and that she was “so thankful it will be out in the world.” We built the event – marketing materials, promotional graphics, a shared sense that this conversation belonged in Nashville.

Then the pressure campaign started.

Within hours of the announcement, social media filled with demands that the store cancel. I was called a “Zionist,” a “Zionist genocide loving freak,” told that “a Zionist author is different than a Jewish author,” and – ironically – a “Nazi.” Customers told her they would not shop there as long as the store hosted me. The message was simple: stand with this Jewish author and pay for it.

I asked the owner directly: had anyone threatened violence?

No, she said.

This was not about safety. I had arranged armed security for the event as a standard operating practice so that I, the bookstore, and our guests would feel comfortable. She responded that she “wasn’t worried at all” and that it “sounded great.”

This was about reputation. This was about Gen Z and younger millennials’ online mob of intimidation. This was about Southern housewives clutching their pearls. This was about the discomfort of being associated with a Jew who isn’t quiet. This is about what happens when your children become indoctrinated in college, graduate, and populate our cities.

The invitation was posted the afternoon of July 25, and the event was canceled less than three days later.

Her reason, explained to my literary agent: “the book was too big, too serious, for her small little store.” That reasoning doesn’t hold up under the timeline. Nothing about the book’s size or seriousness changed between her invitation and the event announcement — only the volume of online pressure did.

Then it got worse.

She contributed to a piece in The Tennessean on July 29 that led readers to believe she still stood behind the event — behind me — even though she had already canceled my launch less than 24 hours earlier. You cannot quietly remove a Jewish author from your store one day and let the public believe you defended her the next. If we’re going to be honest about intimidation, we have to start with honesty itself. And if we are being honest — how are bookstores allowed to claim independence when the online pressure campaign dictates who is shelved and supported?

History doesn’t judge institutions by the statements they issue to cover their cowardice. It judges them by what they do under pressure, when doing the right thing has a cost.

Many will read this as a small-business marketing decision. The Jewish community may recognize something else.

For nearly three years, Jewish writers, artists, musicians, filmmakers, public intellectuals, and photographers have been on the digital front lines of a fight most people still won’t name. We’re rarely part of the political conversation — until our books are published, our art exhibitions open, and our music debuts. Then we’re often first in line for the organized online campaigns built to make institutions decide we’re not worth the trouble.

This pattern should concern everyone, because it isn’t new. People think Nazi Germany’s persecution of Jews began with the Nuremberg Laws. It didn’t. It began with pressure campaigns, public shaming, humiliation, and exclusion. In 1933, radicalized university students organized the “Action Against the Un-German Spirit” against Jewish authors and intellectuals. Blacklists circulated. Books were publicly condemned. Publishers, theaters, and universities distanced themselves from Jewish voices before any law forced them to — because the pressure alone had already worked.

America in 2026 is not Germany in 1933. The Holocaust was a singular horror, and nothing should flatten that. But history doesn’t end there, and the radicalization pipeline looks familiar. Dr. Charles Asher Small, founder of the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, has spent over a decade tracing how Middle Eastern funding — primarily from Qatar — flows into American universities without being reported as required by law. Small doesn’t mince words about who’s behind that money: Qatar, he’s said, is “the sanitized face of the Muslim Brotherhood.” Students who pass through programs shaped by that funding graduate and carry the pattern with them: organized public intimidation, structured shaming, economic threats aimed at small businesses, institutions deciding a Jewish voice simply isn’t worth the inconvenience.

“Zionist” is part of the hate playbook. The word is used as a pejorative for “Jew” — not because the people using it know what it actually means, but because it functions the way a slur functions for any other marginalized group: it lets the person wielding it launder their own bigotry. Calling it “anti-Zionism” instead of antisemitism does the same work the N-word does for a racist — it sanitizes the speaker while it strips the target of their humanity. And it does something else, too: it severs Jews from the very communities we have stood shoulder to shoulder with through civil rights. Zionism, stripped of the slur, is simply the belief that Israel has the right to exist. But to a generation raised on the word as a weapon, “Zionist” has become a scarlet letter — a way to exclude us from the mainstream spaces we contribute to, before anyone has to engage with a single thing we’ve actually said.

My book isn’t even out yet.

The people demanding my event be canceled never read it. They judged the title. They judged the cover. A culture that judges books by their covers is one that will let history’s darkest chapters repeat.

“White. Blonde. Jew.” is about what happens when identity gets weaponized, including the rise of antisemitism, my life as a working photographer, my trips to Israel after October 7, and why bearing witness matters even when it’s uncomfortable. It argues for nuance and against extremism.

None of that mattered to the people who wanted me silenced.

This is bigger than one bookstore. According to the American Jewish Committee, 91% of American Jews now feel less safe in this country; nearly nine in 10. Artists Against Antisemitism members have lived through many of the examples I’ve described, and I am only one data point in a much larger reality: the Anti-Defamation League recorded roughly 6,000 antisemitic incidents last year, an average of 17 every day. And remember how small our community is. If 100 people in a room represented America, just two would represent the Jewish community. Yet those two are increasingly being pushed to the margins of the very mainstream spaces we have helped build. We feel the temperature of this moment every day. It is not heat; it is the cold shoulder.

In the end, the bookstore owner didn’t just cancel the event. She took down the post on July 30. A security justification followed, even though armed security had already been addressed and accepted before the cancellation. The timeline matters.

Jewish books no longer have to be burned to disappear from public life. They need only enough pressure for bookstores to decide they are too costly to defend against their peers.

When you choose to listen to the people doing the intimidating instead of the people being intimidated, you don’t hold the line. You move it. Every time an institution folds, it moves a little farther, one step closer to a pattern history has already shown us to be true.

***

Alyssa Rosenheck is a bestselling author and photographer who brings creativity and clarity to today’s cultural conversation. Named one of Architectural Digest’s Top 50 photographers in the U.S., she blends visual storytelling with advocacy. Her upcoming book, “White. Blonde. Jew.” (August 2026), confronts contemporary antisemitism and calls for a return to truth-telling, intellectual courage, and Western values. Alyssa played a key role in the successful withdrawal of two BDS resolutions in her hometown of Nashville, Tennessee.

Create a free account to join the conversation!

Already have an account?

Log in

Got a tip worth investigating?

Your information could be the missing piece to an important story. Submit your tip today and make a difference.

Submit Tip