Meet The DEI Activist Judge Who Let A Rapist Out Of Prison Early To Spite White People

If you’ve been around a while, you know that Super Bowl ads used to have a lot of cultural significance in this country. Before anyone had a cellphone, and before high-speed Internet access was widespread, there was a lot less “content” for people to watch for hours on end. But pretty much everyone did watch the Super Bowl. And they knew that major corporations, with this rare opportunity to reach a large audience, would put some effort into being as creative and entertaining as possible. And it really didn’t take much because, again, there wasn’t any competition with the Internet or social media. Budweiser managed to transfix the entire country back in 2000 with their Super Bowl ad where a bunch of guys called each other — on landlines — and said, “Whassup?” over and over again. Was it high art? No. But it was good enough.

Today’s Super Bowl ads, by contrast, provide virtually zero entertainment value to anyone. They are soulless and uninteresting, probably by design. But that doesn’t mean we should ignore them. Because if you pay attention to the ads that played during the Super Bowl, then you know that they communicated, at various points, the exact same message as the halftime show — which is that white people are now second-class citizens in the country they built. 

That’s the reason why Bad Bunny’s performance included a bodega with the sign “We Accept EBT,” by the way.

Screenshot: NBC Super Bowl

You can see it here, on the left. It was a reminder to white people that we’re forced to pay foreigners on food stamps — two-thirds of whom are overweight or obese — to go out and buy a sandwich at their favorite bodega. The numbers are staggering, although no one ever talks about them. Roughly 47% of households in Puerto Rico (where Bad Bunny is from) receive some kind of welfare — the highest rate of any U.S. jurisdiction. Nearly 43% of them receive food stamps, which you’re paying for. Yes, almost half of the population of Puerto Rico is on food stamps.

(Which is one of the many reasons we shouldn’t have anything to do with Puerto Rico.) The same is true in places like the Bronx, where 40% of residents are on SNAP, and 20% of the population can’t speak English. So food stamps are a part of the culture for these people. And instead of treating that fact as a source of shame, they’re proud of it. They want to steal as much as possible. That’s exactly what they’re doing. And they want us to know it.

And by the same token, the Super Bowl advertisements reminded us, again and again, that we should shut up and accept our replacement because we’re awful people, simply for being white. Here’s an excerpt from one of the Super Bowl advertisements that pushed this message. It’s from the real estate company Redfin, which helps people buy and sell homes.

Watch:

America could use a neighbor just like you. #BeAGoodNeighbor pic.twitter.com/tCIsyJziTR

— Redfin (@Redfin) February 9, 2026

Credit; @Redfin/X.com

So here’s the Cliff Notes version. The white family moves into town. There’s the implication that the dad is out of the picture, so we have an absentee father on our hands. And then we see that the white girl — who’s trying to make friends with other white girls — has an icy, awkward interaction with the non-white girl when her white supremacist dog starts barking.

And then, separately, a Hispanic-looking man tries to be a good neighbor and warn a white guy about an impending storm. But the white guy just ignores him, presumably because he’s a racist, too, just like the dog. And then after the storm hits, the non-white guy starts removing a tree from the white guy’s yard — and the white guy still doesn’t say “thanks.” It’s all very reminiscent of about a million other ads — including those Allstate ads, where the criminal is always a white guy who steals black people’s cars.

Redfin knew exactly what they were doing here. When they posted this ad on their official social media accounts, Redfin immediately locked down the replies, and started “hiding” as many responses as they could.

Here’s a sampling of some of the posts that Redfin attempted to censor, although you can probably imagine most of them.

What is the message ? White men are racist? Old trope !

Here’s another.

They would never ever make the Hispanic family the villain, it’s always going to be White people as the default. It always is in almost every commercial these days. Competent brown people surrounded by the either incompetent or malicious White people.

And they go on and on. What may not be obvious is that, a couple of years ago, Redfin was sued in federal court for supposedly being a racist company that discriminated against blacks. Redfin was accused of “redlining” — which, in this case, meant that they wouldn’t offer some of their most expensive services to very cheap homes. It wasn’t profitable enough for them to offer, say, professional photography and in-home tours for a dilapidated shack in the hood that was listed for $70,000 or something. There was nothing racist about Redfin’s decision making. But because their rational business decision had a “disparate or disproportionate impact” on black people — since black people tend to own cheap homes — Redfin had to settle the case, and agree to provide their services to more people, even when it went against their economic interests to do so.

This is a very, very common kind of lawsuit in our federal system. Democrats go out of their way to force real estate companies to provide unprofitable services, or else they’ll be sued for racism. Here’s one of the most egregious examples. Under the Biden administration, a company called Townstone was sued into the ground, simply because they didn’t receive enough housing applications from “minority areas.” Out of around 870 applications, the Biden administration said that Townstone was roughly 30 “diverse” applicants short. Yes, if they only had 30 more “diverse” applications, everything would be fine. But they didn’t, so they’re racist and they’re violating the law. Basically, if you don’t meet some arbitrary quota that makes Democrats and black activists happy, then you get sued under civil rights law. If you don’t agree to operate your business at a loss, for the benefit of black people and foreigners, then you’ll get sued.

So within this legal framework, the rational decision for these companies, if they want to survive the next Democrat administration, is to become overtly anti-white. They have to prove that they discriminate against whites and give preference to blacks. That’s what Redfin is doing with this advertisement. It’s a gigantic signal. And it’s an effective way to avoid getting sued and having to pay tens of millions of dollars in damages. Our legal system is encouraging anti-white racism.

And that’s one reason why, in advertisement after advertisement during the Super Bowl, major corporations took pains to portray whites as maliciously as they possibly could. Here’s a Super Bowl ad from the healthcare company Hims and Hers, for example.

See if you notice anything:

Credit: Hims & Hers/YouTube.com

They say all those “rich people” — who are pretty much all white — have something you don’t. They have the Fountain of Youth. Those crafty rich white people — one of whom appears to be modeled after Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk — are buying more stuff than you, and they’re living longer. And then they cut to the black guy holding a child, who’s very dismayed by all of this. Because he’s not white and therefore rich, he’ll probably die soon. That’s what “health equity” is all about. And it’s a systemic injustice, we’re told — which “Hims and Hers” is going to solve.

Notice this casting only goes one way. They’ll happily cast white actors to play rich people, since rich people are mostly white. But they’ll never cast a black guy to play a car thief in one of those Allstate ads for example, even though car thieves are mostly black. And along the same lines, they won’t cast black people to play antisemites, either, even though black people, on average, are far more antisemitic than any other race. So instead, as always, they’ll portray white people as vicious Jew haters, and black people as the stalwart allies of the oppressed Jews.

Here was Robert Kraft’s Super Bowl ad, to drill that point home.

Watch:

Jewish billionaire Robert Kraft’s Blue Square Alliance has unveiled an ad targeting Jew-hatred that will be aired during the Superbowl this upcoming weekend. pic.twitter.com/942rzPf55Y

— Moshe Schwartz (@YWNReporter) February 4, 2026

Credit: @YWNReporter/X.com

It’s just relentless — one ad after another, one streaming show after another. They’re beating you over the head with the anti-white narratives, which are clearly fraudulent. People are seeing it everywhere — and not just people who watch Fox News, or subscribe to The Daily Wire. It’s also the case that everyday people, who don’t pay much attention to politics, are finally seeing what’s going on, simply because they can’t escape it.

That brings us to a truly disturbing and disgraceful decision this week by a Judge in Kentucky named Tracy E. Davis. The judge — a black woman — reduced the sentence of 24-year-old Christopher Thompson — a violent black felon — from 65 years to just 30 years.

Louisville Metro Police Department.

So it’s a reduction of more than 50% in his sentence. Here was the crime: Prosecutors proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that in the summer of 2023, Thompson approached a woman who was sitting in her car in the parking lot of her apartment building. Thompson, wearing a ski mask, pointed a gun at her and forced her to move to the passenger seat. Then he drove the woman to an elementary school, where he forced her to remove her clothes and sexually assaulted her. He then drove the woman to an ATM and forced her to withdraw more than $200, before driving her back to the school and sexually assaulting her again. So this is kidnapping, multiple counts of sexual assault, robbery, and sodomy.

And after hearing all the evidence, the jury sentenced Thompson to 65 years, which by any measure, is an extremely lenient sentence. He should’ve received the death penalty. There is no good reason to not simply kill someone like this, legally, after they’ve been convicted in a court of law. But Judge Tracy Davis didn’t want this man to serve 65 years, much less face execution. So she cut his sentence in half. Keep in mind that under Kentucky law, remorse is the bare minimum requirement to reduce a sentence like this. And with that in mind, we’re going to play this local news report at length — because it’s easily one of the most insane reports that I’ve ever seen from a local news station. 

Watch:

Credit: WDRB News/YouTube.com

He admits, in open court, that he’s an animal. He doesn’t care about the victim or anyone else. He’d happily kidnap and sodomize another woman, if given the opportunity. He has stated explicitly that he has no remorse, he doesn’t care, and he isn’t sorry for what he did. He is clearly and unambiguously someone who needs to spend the rest of his life in a cage, at a minimum. He’s demonstrating the exact opposite of remorse, which is the one thing, under the law, that could justify reducing his sentence in any way. And after all that, the judge, a black female, cuts his sentence in half. Because after all, the guy “fell through the cracks.” The implication is that, if you don’t have a good family and a good support network, and you’re black, then you have no responsibility for your own actions.

So who is this judge, Tracey Davis? What might lead her to make a ruling like this? Well, it turns out — in the shock of the century — that she’s a DEI activist.

According to her profile on the Kentucky Bar Association’s website: “Judge Davis is a graduate of [the] NKU Chase College of Law. Prior to taking the bench she owned and operated Tracy E. Davis, Esq. PLLC, a private practice law firm, and ran a diversity consulting company, Diversity University Ltd. Co., where she was a certified Diversity Equity and Inclusion Professional (CDP).”

Yes, she’s an actual, real-life certified DEI expert. She is the character I played in my last film, except she’s a real person — a judge who can spring violent felons loose on the public, based on her DEI training and the night classes she took at the “NKU Chase College of Law.” (Which, suffice it to say, is basically open-admission for “diverse candidates” like herself).

And it gets worse, somehow. This judge’s handle on X — and I’m not making this up — is literally “Diversity Davis.” She has pronouns in her handle, as well (she/her, in case you were wondering). She’s reposted a bunch of anti-Trump content, mostly in the format of Marvel memes, of course. In short, Tracey Davis should be off leading some DEI struggle session somewhere, in which she takes money from rich Leftists with too much time on their hands. That’s all she’s qualified to do. But instead, she managed to win an election by around 1% of the vote a couple of years ago. So now she’s a judge in Kentucky, which last I checked, is not a far-Left state. And we can infer, based on that video, that she’s a walking combination of suicidal female empathy and anti-white race hatred. She’s the kind of judge you might find in a war-torn African hellscape, or even worse, Canada. She’s only interested in your skin color and her tribe.

And if you listen to the rest of her ruling in this case — which that last news report left out — you’ll find that, actually, the judge admits all of this. Lest anyone think I’m “making this about race.” She is the one who made it about race, explicitly so.

She states, effectively, that white people are the reason she’s letting this rapist out of prison, 35 years early. 

Watch:

🚨 WTF?! A jury in Louisville recommended 65 years in prison for a convicted RAPlST KIDNAPPER, and an activist judge cut it in HALF

Because he’s BLACK.

The convict made CRYSTAL CLEAR he didn’t have any remorse, and didn’t care about the victim.

IMPEACH! pic.twitter.com/38vigX8h6f

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) February 9, 2026

Credit: @nicksortor/X.com

“As an African American male, you experienced this society.” Yes, he’s the real victim here. Think of what he went through. Feel some sympathy for the violent sodomite rapist. He, after all, had to “experience this society.” Apparently “experiencing society” is a valid excuse that can get your sentence cut in half. That’s good news for literally every criminal who’s ever existed, given that they all, by virtue of existing, have “experienced society.” 

But that’s why he kidnapped and raped and brutalized an innocent woman. It’s white people’s fault. He had to experience a society where black people get the benefit of the doubt, in everything they do, at every level. What a shame. And even as this violent criminal tells her, to her face, that he wants to sexually assault her as well, she doesn’t care. 

I’ll ask the same question I did yesterday: Have any Republicans, at the national level, even mentioned this case? Republicans in Kentucky are proposing legislation that would allow the public to learn more about decisions like this. But this isn’t a local issue. And it’s not an issue of “transparency. ” If unapologetic, violent black criminals are getting 50% sentencing reductions because black female judges want to “strike back” against white people, then we have a major civil rights problem in this country. 

If the Biden administration could shut down the military to root out “white supremacy,” and if they could haul a presidential candidate to jail because he said he won an election, then there’s nothing that should stop the Trump DOJ from launching a civil rights investigation into this judge, immediately. You can’t admit, from the bench, that you’re making rulings on the basis of race. Period. We cannot allow this kind of ruling to stand. 

Nor can we allow openly anti-white police officers to remain employed. And that’s apparently a problem as well. This is a story that Libs of TikTok just broke. It’s a video in which a black female police officer, with the Shreveport Police Department in Louisiana, states — in full uniform, as she eats lunch for some reason — that she’s the “black officer your wife fears.”

Watch:

Meet Breanna Harrison, a police officer with the Shreveport Police Department in Louisiana. She made a post telling white men that she’s the “black officer your wife fears.”

This sounds like a threat.

Harrison was already placed on leave once before in 2025 for posting videos… pic.twitter.com/v5moHLMNOq

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 9, 2026

Credit: @libsoftiktok/X.com/TikTok.com

No matter where you look — TikTok, the local court system, the Super Bowl — anti-white hatred is thrust in your face. You can make the argument that nothing like this has happened, at this scale in this country, in more than 30 years. That takes us back to the OJ Simpson trial, when tens of thousands of black Americans publicly celebrated the brutal execution of two white people. Has anything changed since then? Have “race relations” improved since then, after all of the affirmative action and “equity” we’ve experienced?

They knew OJ did it, at the time. No sane person could claim otherwise.

AP Photo/Quad-City Times,Larry Fisher

And when the verdict came down, everyone knew exactly why black people were celebrating, as whites were shocked and dismayed. It had nothing to do with the evidence of the case. It was about anti-white racial hatred. The difference is that, with the OJ trial, most of OJ’s supporters claimed — as a pretext — that they were interested in “finding the real killer.” Polls showed that most black people claimed to believe OJ was innocent.

Credit: The Washington Post

In fact, only around 22% of black people said OJ was guilty during the trial. And that number is well over 50% now. So there was still a sense in the 90s that, in the United States, it was wrong to openly admit that you were happy that two white people were brutally slaughtered.

Today, you probably wouldn’t even need the pretext. OJ could admit, in open court, that he murdered his wife (and her friend) because they were white. And a judge would forgive him, because the “system” made him do it. The judge would’ve apologized to OJ and said he “fell through the cracks.”

Actually, not everyone went along with this pretext, at the time.

In fact, one of the OJ jurors came out and admitted that the case was a form of payback.

Watch:

A juror from the O.J. Simpson trial said 90% of the jury believed he was guilty but acquitted him anyway as ‘payback’ to White people. pic.twitter.com/CHZgIIZ53i

— Taya (@travelingflying) February 4, 2026

Credit: @travelingflying/X.com

Watching that, you might be tempted to take this woman at face value — and see this as “payback” for Rodney King’s beating. The problem with that excuse is that, in every context, from country to country, we see a clear racial bias in the jury system. It’s a very consistent trend. And it has nothing to do with OJ, or celebrity cases, or anything like that.

Take a look at this data, which was published in the journal Law and Human Behavior.

Credit: Law and Human Behavior

As the researcher Jonatan Palleson summarizes the findings, “Over 34 studies of jury behavior, and [more than 7,000] participants, White jurors show essentially 0 racial bias, while Blacks have strong bias in favor of their own race.”

Credit: Mitchell et al. 2005. Chart by Crémieux Recueil/@cremieuxrecueil

You can see an illustration of those findings here. White jurors, in mock trials, were mostly fair to defendants regardless of their skin color. Meanwhile black jurors demonstrated a high degree of favoritism to members of their own race. Another study in the UK found, in addition, that black jurors are far more likely than white jurors to convict white people.

Credit: ucl.ac.uk/Diversity and Fairness in the Jury System

In short, the West has not progressed towards a mythical “color blind” society. The OJ verdict wasn’t really about Rodney King. It was about the hatred that many non-whites in Los Angeles felt towards white people. And many non-whites in Los Angeles, and the country at large, still feel that way. And now, with very powerful financial support, they’re making their hatred for whites very apparent. It’s evident in our culture. And increasingly, it’s evident in our legal system.

For all intents and purposes, we now have a new Constitution in this country, without anyone ever voting for it. In this new Constitution, whites are not entitled to equal treatment under the law. And this DEI regime is propped up, and fed by, a two-tiered media system (our own Radio Rwanda) in which the media focuses excessively — and obsessively — on relatively rare instances of white-on-black crime, and rare police shootings. Their sole objective is to foment race hatred, just like the Democrat Party, and just like Redfin and Robert Kraft and so on. It’s possible that a lot of people were finally awakened by the Super Bowl halftime show, and that millions of Americans now realize what’s going on. But you have to wonder, if that’s the case, why they didn’t realize any of this much sooner.

And there’s another question we have to answer. If all of the country’s major institutions — from the courts to the corporations to the bureaucracy to the schools to the media and the nonprofits and so on — are oriented towards replacing white people and making the new minority-majority hate white people, and if all available evidence suggests that these new demographic groups will vote (and render judicial decisions) on the basis of ethnicity and race, then what happens next? This situation is not self-correcting. It’s going to proceed until one of two outcomes is reached: Either white people have civil rights, or they don’t. And if they don’t, then white people will become tribal too — which is an outcome that most on the Left genuinely don’t think will occur. But if this continues, it will. If they continue to deny basic civil liberties to white people, that’s the inevitable result. And with each passing day, police officers, judges, and major corporations are making their position very clear on that particular issue. It’s well past time — more than 30 years overdue — for conservatives, and white people in general, to take note.