It was just a few days ago that we discussed the extreme level of disdain that Democrats were displaying, seemingly out of nowhere, toward a small number of white refugees who were arriving in the United States. All at once, the same people with the yard signs that proclaim “no one is illegal” and “love is love” were suddenly overcome with bloodlust, all because a handful of Afrikaners landed at Dulles airport. In the history of “mask-off moments” in this country, this one ranks pretty high on the list. It’s a bit like when the Manson Family single-handedly destroyed the reputation of the hippie movement. Once you start talking about murdering people — or actually murdering people — you can’t really recover from it. No one’s going to buy your “peace and love” schtick ever again. They’re going to see you for exactly what you are.
In the case of the Afrikaners, what underlies the race hatred on the Left is their transparent desire to see all of Western civilization crumble. Everyone understands that now. They want to import Somali fraudsters and Central American gangsters while turning away white farmers precisely because they know that the white farmers will improve this country, while the criminals will destroy it. There has never been another point in American history where the political divide has been so stark: One side wants the United States to prosper, while the other wants the entire continent to devolve into a dysfunctional wasteland. They want to bring ruin to one of the few remaining functional countries on the planet. What this means is that, in essence, Democrats have adopted nihilism. They do not believe human life has any inherent worth or purpose. They reject truth and objectivity in all contexts. They are anti-human, and they’re no longer being very subtle about it.
For years, it’s been evident that nihilists and pro-human conservatives have been on a collision course. After all, these are not remotely compatible ideologies. They are not capable of co-existing in one place for any significant length of time. Humanity, simply by existing, enrages anti-human nihilists. And these nihilists are realizing that, despite their best efforts, there’s only so much destruction you can achieve by importing the third world and murdering children in the womb. Therefore, it was only a matter of time until one of these nihilists decided to take matters into his own hands and commit an act of terrorism. And on Saturday morning, that’s exactly what happened.
WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show
Just before noon, less than an hour from downtown Palm Springs, California, a 25-year-old man detonated a vehicle-borne explosive device in the car park outside a fertility clinic called “American Reproductive Centers.” According to the authorities, the result was “the largest bombing scene that we’ve had in Southern California.” Several people were injured. Offices were damaged, although the lab at the fertility clinic, which houses eggs and embryos, was not affected. One man was thrown from his bike, and the impact was felt two miles away. Watch:
You can listen to that whole news report, and you won’t find any explanation of the suspect’s motives. And you know why that is: It’s highly inconvenient for these people to tell the truth about Left-wing terrorism, because they’re still trying to convince everyone that white supremacy is the greatest threat facing the country. So here’s the truth: The bomber left behind extensive writings and audio recordings on the internet, meticulously explaining that he committed this act of terrorism as part of a “war against pro-lifers.” Those are his words. He says that “the bible is slander against Satan,” that God is a “creep,” and that “Your God definitely doesn’t exist, but if he did, I’d choose satan over your evil God.” The bomber also states that he wants to begin the process of “sterilizing this planet of the disease of life.” There’s also reportedly some rage against Elon Musk, who famously opposes the depopulation of the planet.
A day before the attack, according to researcher Erin Cruz, the bomber openly posted his plans on a message board devoted to “sanctioned suicide,” right down to the precise bomb-making techniques he planned to use, and how he planned to be high on opiates at the time of the explosion. But apparently no one reported this post, even though several people “liked” it and responded. If this reporting is accurate, and it appears to be, then it’s obviously yet another indictment of our intelligence services. It’s also a sign of how pervasive this anti-human death cult is. There are entire communities devoted to ending the human race. And even when they’re talking about acts of terrorism, no one’s paying any attention to them.
But we should be paying attention, because what happened on Saturday was not an aberration. Nihilism is the guiding ethos of the elites, which is why every day, they’re promoting it in one context or another. Maybe the most striking case involves the Left’s current effort to secure the murder of a 21-week-old child in the state of Georgia. Here’s the background. In February, a 30-year-old woman named Adriana Smith was nine weeks pregnant when she began suffering from severe headaches. She went to the hospital, which gave her medications and sent her home. The next day, according to her boyfriend, she began gasping for air and making gurgling noises. A CT scan showed that she had multiple blood clots in her brain. As of now, she’s 21 weeks pregnant and brain-dead. She’s been kept alive on a ventilator for months so that she can give birth. In other words, the doctors are doing everything they can to preserve the life of the unborn child.
This is an outcome that, unless you’re a demon who despises humanity, you would obviously support. The alternative is to kill the child solely because his mother is brain-dead. But that alternative outcome is precisely what the corporate press is pushing for. In fact, it also appears to be what the woman’s family is pushing for. The woman’s mother, April Newkirk, just gave an interview with NBC News, where she suggested that they might want to kill the child because of the possibility that it will be difficult to raise him. Watch:
You can tell what’s going on here. She understands that, if she comes out and tells doctors to murder her own grandchild, everyone will immediately recognize what a cartoonishly evil goblin that she is. So instead, she suggests that she just wants the “choice” to decide whether to kill her grandchild, without saying definitively whether she’d follow through with it. (Never mind the fact that, obviously, the only reason she’d want the “choice” is so that she can exercise that choice).
And that’s evident by the end of the interview, where she states that she’s “in her 50s,” and therefore she’s incapable of taking care of a child. That’s literally one of the excuses she uses to murder her own grandchild. “Oh, I’m in my 50s and so is my husband; how could I possibly help raise this child? Better kill him instead.” Just pause to consider the implications of that statement for a second. And then realize that a major television network aired it, sympathetically, as if there’s nothing deranged and demonic about it. She’s looking at one tragedy — the death of her daughter — and then openly fantasizing about killing another member of her family. There are women in their 90s who would leap at the opportunity to help raise their grandchild, especially if it meant saving his life. But this woman’s just too old for that, apparently. Of course, if she were in her 20s or 30s, we’d be hearing about how the grandchild is just too inconvenient for her career or whatever. These people will rationalize murder in one way or another. That’s a given.
Now, to be as fair as possible to this force of personified evil that walks among us, she does offer another excuse, besides being “in her 50s.” She also says that it’s possible her grandchild might be “blind, and may not be able to walk.” Therefore, we’re supposed to sympathize with her decision to kill the child. Again, in a functioning, moral society, this woman would be in prison for plotting to kill her disabled grandchild. At the very least, she’d be receiving a psych evaluation as we speak. Instead, she’s being encouraged to say all of this. The corporate press and the Left are completely behind her. And of course that’s *why* she’s doing it. She’s flippantly justifying the murder of her own grandchild because, for her whole life, she’s been told that it’s her right to commit murder. And she lacks the moral character and intelligence to come to any other conclusion.
For Democrats and the media, the angle is pretty clear. They’re suggesting that Georgia’s “heartbeat law,” which bans abortions after roughly six weeks in most cases, has resulted in a dystopian scenario where women are being chained to beds and forced to give birth. They’re not talking about the life of the child at all. They’re not even discussing the extraordinary circumstances involved in this particular case. Instead, they’re pretending that women are going to be lined up, enslaved and turned into baby-making machines, at scale. Here’s one representative social media post — it has more than five million views and hundreds of thousands of “likes”:
“Remember the episode in the Handmaid’s Tale, where a brain dead, black handmaid is kept on life support long enough to give birth? This is happening in Atlanta, GA right now. Her name is Adriana Smith. She was only 9wks when the state kidnapped her body from her family.”
Yes, the state “kidnapped her body from her family,” according to this post. Of course, they omit any explanation of what actually happened. They don’t explain that the alternative is to murder the child, either. Instead, we just get a pop culture reference. And this really gets at a larger problem, which is that a large proportion of the population is only capable of engaging in any kind of moral reasoning by using analogies to recent works of fiction.
This is how most Democrats are taught to think. And of course, they dutifully obey. But it’s not how the leaders of the Democrat Party think. They’re far more intelligent, and far more evil. And if you listen to them long enough, they’ll explain exactly what they have in mind for the future of this country. They won’t simply embrace the so-called “great replacement” theory. They’ll go into great detail, explaining why it’s bad for Americans to have nuclear families and to believe in Christ. They’ll also elaborate on why it’s better for foreigners to come into this country and have large families to replace all of the natives. Here’s Hillary Clinton to explain:
We’ve been having a lot of “mask off” moments lately on the Left. This is one of the more revealing ones. Notice what she’s *not* saying. She’s not explaining what’s wrong with Christianity. She’s also not explaining why it’s wrong to advocate for stable, two-parent households. Twenty years ago, this would’ve been an issue that 100% of Americans would agree on. Every single person would’ve told you that intact, two-parent households are a good thing. But now we have one of the most prominent Democrats in the world stating, as if it’s obvious to everyone, that it’s bad to advocate for Christian nuclear families.
And then she immediately reveals exactly what she doesn’t like about the nuclear family. She wants illegal aliens, whom she calls “undocumented,” to “replenish” the American population. She wants this country to lose its national identity as quickly as possible. And the nuclear family stands in the way of that. Of course, even if Hillary Clinton really believed that foreign nationals are a net benefit to the American economy — which they aren’t — there’s still no reason whatsoever for her to advocate *against* stable American families. That part of her argument is completely unexplained. You’d think she’d support foreign migration in addition to American families. But she doesn’t. She only supports the illegal aliens because she knows that, eventually, they will completely replace this country’s population. And once they do that, every country will be just as dysfunctional as Somalia and Haiti and Venezuela. Food shortages and disease will spread, and millions of people will die. Hillary Clinton knows all of this, and she’s doing everything in her power — which is thankfully limited at the moment — to make it happen.
And that tells you, for at least the third time this week, that Democrats are fundamentally an anti-human party. They reject the idea that human life has any intrinsic value. They also despise Western civilization and see third-world migration as a way to destabilize and destroy it. And anti-natalism is the core plank of this ideology. It’s evident in the terrorist attack in California. It’s evident in this deranged effort by a grandmother to unlock the “option” of murdering her own grandchild. And it’s evident if you listen to Hillary Clinton speak for five seconds. This is a worldview that’s taken hold at every level of the Left. It’s only sustainable because most people don’t see what’s happening. For the sake of the future generations — generations that these people badly do not want to exist — it’s time to start paying attention.

Continue reading this exclusive article and join the conversation, plus watch free videos on DW+
Already a member?