As we learn more about the senseless SUV attack on the crowd attending a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin, some liberal media outlets are energetically attempting to spin away from the suspect Darrell Brooks and his left-wing politics on social media.
That&#8217;s funny. With Kyle Rittenhouse, they quickly dug into his social media activity. The Washington Post warned last summer &#8220;the 17-year-old shadowed local law enforcement, filling his social media feeds with posts declaring that &#8216;Blue Lives Matter&#8217; and photos of himself posing with guns.&#8221; For Brooks, the Post lamely mentioned Brooks wrote under the name MathBoi Fly and that &#8220;after multiple legal battles,&#8221; he &#8220;started turning the life he lived in the streets into music.&#8221;
In their Thanksgiving edition, USA Today&#8217;s front page explored the politics of &#8220;vehicle ramming.&#8221; But they shifted the scrutiny back to people who resent &#8220;Black Lives Matter&#8221; protests, especially the protesters that block roads and threaten drivers and passengers with violence.
Reporter Dennis Wagner wrote: &#8220;Weaponizing of vehicles is a practice sometimes used by terrorists abroad. But the wanton attacks have also surged in the United States. The increase began after the police murder of George Floyd prompted Black Lives Matter demonstrations, which in turn prompted angry or fearful motorists to run over protesters.&#8221;
This framing makes it sound like protesters are &#8220;peaceful&#8221; and not &#8220;angry&#8221; and pose no threat. Wagner added, &#8220;A Boston Globe survey identified at least 139 incidents in which vehicles ran into crowds of demonstrators since Floyd&#8217;s death in May 2020. Fewer than half resulted in criminal charges.&#8221;
Really? The original Globe story appeared on Halloween by reporter Jess Bidgood, who sounds more like an opinion writer. She began with the usual sympathetic figure: a man who was paralyzed after falling off an interstate overpass while blocking drivers in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Bidgood was outraged no one was arrested, despite admitting that the red pickup involved felt threatened as &#8220;protesters banged on its hood and threw things at the vehicle as it moved in.&#8221;
Bidgood wrote, &#8220;A Globe review of the recent incidents found there have been scores of people hit, dozens of injuries, at least three deaths, but precious little justice, much less sympathy, for the demonstrators injured, killed, or just plain terrified. Yet Oklahoma and 15 other states have considered bills protecting drivers, not protesters, as these ramming incidents have proliferated.&#8221;
In the minds of the Globe, driving into a road-blocking protest makes you guilty until proven innocent. &#8220;Given the choice between defending the safety of pedestrians protesting a police murder and the drivers of the vehicles running them down, prosecutors and lawmakers here have reserved their concern for the drivers.&#8221; You&#8217;re &#8220;running them down&#8221; if you attempt to escape.
In fact, Bidgood compared the drivers to Bull Connor and the violent racists who beat John Lewis and other civil rights protesters. &#8220;To those on the short end of this cold calculus, it feels like siding, during the 1960s civil rights protests, with Bull Connor&#8217;s firehoses over the Black children of Birmingham. Or with the cops with clubs over the brave, battered souls who traversed Selma&#8217;s Edmund Pettus Bridge.&#8221;
This article is littered with reckless smears like this. But this article is linked in Bidgood&#8217;s pinned tweet. She&#8217;s very proud of this.
The Globe&#8217;s ramming-incident numbers were accumulated in part with the help of &#8220;The Armed Conflict Location &amp; Event Data Project,&#8221; which sounds objective. But this ACLED group has also delighted the liberal media with the data that &#8220;the vast majority of Black Lives Matter protests — more than 93% — have been peaceful.&#8221;
Consumer beware: These studies are ideologically loaded.
The views expressed in this piece are the author&#8217;s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Waukesha

GRAHAM: The Politics Of Weaponized Car Attacks

Media Bias

MSNBC host Joy Reid is the only minority host on her network from noon to midnight, so it&#8217;s only natural she would be most expected to lecture on the evils of whiteness, especially white maleness. It can even happen on her social media accounts.
On Nov. 16, Reid took to TikTok to compare the Kyle Rittenhouse trial to the confirmation hearings of Brett Kavanaugh three years ago.
&#8220;This Kyle Rittenhouse trial. It reminded a lot of people of something — something, can&#8217;t remember what it was,&#8221; she said. &#8220;Oh. The Brett Kavanaugh hearings, in which Brett Kavanaugh, who had been accused by a high school friend of committing sexual abuse of her, cried his way through the hearings&#8221; to make the Supreme Court.
No &#8220;independent&#8221; fact-checker will object, but Kavanaugh didn&#8217;t &#8220;cry his way through&#8221; confirmation hearings. In fact, Kavanaugh teared up during his opening statement as he described his 10-year-old daughter Liza&#8217;s reaction to Christine Blasey Ford&#8217;s allegations. &#8220;We should pray for the woman,&#8221; Kavanaugh says his daughter responded. &#8220;That&#8217;s a lot of wisdom from a 10-year-old.&#8221; He also choked up when describing the impact of the charges on his family.
But who needs context when you&#8217;re &#8220;owning&#8221; the white male conservatives?
Reid continued: &#8220;And his tears turned out to be more powerful than the tears of Christine Blasey Ford, which were the tears of an alleged victim.&#8221; Strongly underline &#8220;alleged.&#8221; Ford could never locate a time and place where she and Kavanaugh had ever met as teenagers.
This is where this attempted connection to Rittenhouse collapses. Kavanaugh hadn&#8217;t shot anyone during a riot. They couldn&#8217;t prove that he had done anything like raping girls as a teenage boy, despite multiple accusers with exotic stories.
Rittenhouse scrunched up his face and lost his composure when describing how he shot and killed two men. And if he hadn&#8217;t cried? Then he&#8217;d be trashed by Reid as a sociopath.
Reid&#8217;s rant continued: &#8220;But in America, there&#8217;s a thing about both white vigilantism and white tears, particularly male white tears. Really, white tears in general because that&#8217;s what Karens are, right? They Karen-out, and as soon as they get caught, they bring waterworks. White men can get away with that, too, and it has the same effect.&#8221;
No one&#8217;s going to find Joy Reid mocking a &#8220;Karen-out&#8221; when Hillary Clinton teared up on the campaign trail in 2008, or when she teared up in a Benghazi hearing in 2013. The networks touted that as a masterful performance.
&#8220;The indignation. And then, the tears in her eyes,&#8221; ABC anchor Diane Sawyer announced before trumpeting: &#8220;It was a valedictory that showed her indignation and emotion as she ends this tenure on the public stage.&#8221; It was a &#8220;riveting encounter.&#8221;
For her part, Reid is best remembered for exclaiming how Clinton was just about the most qualified contender ever in 2016: &#8220;My God, since the Founding Fathers, has anyone tried to run for president with more on their resume?&#8221;
This is how Reid concluded on the white male tears: &#8220;Even as the right tries to politicize the idea that masculinity is being robbed from American men by multiculturalism and wokeism, they still want to be able to have their tears.&#8221;
The common thread is the Left’s cynical accusation that these incidents of white male crying or choking up on television were insincerely staged for personal gain or political effect. What Reid was cynically offering was an early basket of sour grapes that the Left failed to destroy either Kavanaugh or Rittenhouse.
The views expressed in this piece are the author&#8217;s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Joy Reid

GRAHAM: Joy Reid And White Male Tears

Brett Kavanaugh

Kyle Rittenhouse

At The Washington Post, when Democrats are kicked unceremoniously out of office, it can only mean one thing: Democracy died in darkness.
Take Sen. Stephen Sweeney, the powerful Democrat leader of the state Senate in New Jersey. Absolutely no one thought he would lose to a Republican who was a trucker and had a tiny campaign treasury.
Paul Farhi, a veteran media reporter at the Post, diagnosed the problem in a story headlined, &#8220;How the media missed a New Jersey senate candidate&#8217;s racist social media posts — until he&#8217;d already won.&#8221; A more accurate headline would be, &#8220;How the media failed to help a Democrat win (because no one thought he would lose).&#8221;
Farhi insisted Ed Durr &#8220;had a history of posting bigoted, misogynistic and derogatory comments on social media.&#8221; Like what? None of Durr&#8217;s tweets were quoted in full by Farhi, and Durr quickly deleted his Twitter account, so a lot of context is missing.
No. 1: &#8220;Mohammed was a pedophile!&#8221; he tweeted in 2019, and also described Islam as &#8220;a false religion&#8221; and &#8220;a cult of hate.&#8221;
Mohammed, according to Islamic writings, married a 6-year-old child bride. But the Post seems upset that Islam is being criticized at all. Is it &#8220;racist&#8221; or &#8220;bigoted&#8221; to say there&#8217;s such a thing as a &#8220;false religion&#8221;? Muslims believe other faiths are false, to put it mildly. Christians believe other faiths are false. That&#8217;s why they have their own faiths. &#8220;Cult of hate&#8221; is harsh, but it sounds pretty close to how the Post describes die-hard Trump fans.
No. 2: Durr called the coronavirus &#8220;the China virus.&#8221;
So, it&#8217;s &#8220;racist&#8221; to identify the virus from where it originated. Journalists began the pandemic saying &#8220;Wuhan virus&#8221; and so on, until they were told it was racist, and then they became adamant that no one could insult Communist China for letting loose a deadly pandemic on the world.
No. 3: Durr blamed an &#8220;influx of #illegalAliens&#8221; for spreading disease.
The Post thinks it&#8217;s racist to be concerned about immigrants flooding across the border with no coronavirus screening. It&#8217;s the only time liberals seem to get incredibly cavalier about COVID. It&#8217;s also considered &#8220;racist&#8221; to say &#8220;illegal aliens.&#8221;
No. 4: This one is both &#8220;bigoted&#8221; and &#8220;misogynistic,&#8221; apparently. Durr &#8220;denigrated Vice President Harris on Facebook, writing she had earned her position only as a result of race and gender.&#8221;
Everyone with a political pulse knows the leftist base of the Democrat Party demanded Biden nominate a woman of color. So, apparently, the mortal sin here is using the word &#8220;only.&#8221; But if Harris was a white guy named Karl, the other attributes wouldn&#8217;t matter either.
Farhi lamented that a database search found that no one reviewed Durr&#8217;s social media statements in any of his campaigns in 2017, 2019, and 2021. He also lamented that the media in southern New Jersey is being eviscerated by economic trends.
But he also notes that powerful Sweeney failed to research his opposition. &#8220;Reporters often rely on leaks of damaging information,&#8221; he wrote. Yes, especially if both the reporter and the candidate are Democrats, as is often the case.
The Post didn&#8217;t seem to think this through the other way. If Sweeney had won easily, they would file no story complaining about the decimated media in south Jersey. They would have never found an objectionable tweet from obscure Durr.
But with this lament, they have told us all they can&#8217;t imagine voters making a decision without heavy influence from the media, and the decision to dump a powerful Democrat is somehow a failure of local journalism.
The views expressed in this piece are the author&#8217;s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Washington Post

GRAHAM: New Jersey Democracy Died In Darkness?

New Jersey

A British leftist group calling itself the Center for Countering Digital Hate has issued a report on what it calls the &#8220;Toxic Ten,&#8221; which are so-called fringe websites spreading &#8220;climate change denial.&#8221; The ten include our group, the Media Research Center, as well as Breitbart, The Daily Wire, Townhall Media, Newsmax, The Washington Times and The Western Journal.
So, any challenge to Greenpeace climate-crackdown orthodoxy is now classified as &#8220;toxic&#8221; and &#8220;digital hate.&#8221;
Their solution? To press Facebook and Google to &#8220;stop monetizing&#8221; these conservative sites, stop allowing them to buy ads and to &#8220;comprehensively label&#8221; their climate reporting as misinformation. You don&#8217;t have to prove conservatives wrong. Just &#8220;comprehensively label&#8221; them as false.
Once again, the left wants to win debates by stopping any debate from happening. The founder of this &#8220;Digital Hate&#8221; squad is a man named Imran Ahmed, who previously co-authored the book &#8220;The New Serfdom: The Triumph of Conservative Ideas and How to Defeat Them,&#8221; with Angela Eagle, a Labour Party member of Parliament.
Ahmed can already count on jihad from the &#8220;objective media.&#8221; Their British socialist friends at The Guardian awarded their report with the headline &#8220;&#8216;Super polluters&#8217;: the top 10 publishers denying the climate crisis on Facebook.&#8221;
Offering any criticism of climate panic (and climate policy) is &#8220;super polluting.&#8221; Does this sound like science, or does it sound like political hyperbole? Naturally, Ahmed told The Guardian, &#8220;big tech is once again on the wrong side of science, truth and human progress.&#8221;
The Washington Post also provided a pliant piece headlined &#8220;Breitbart has outsized influence over climate change denial on Facebook, report says.&#8221; Tech reporter Cat Zakrzewski warned, &#8220;The far-right news and commentary site is one of just 10 publishers responsible for nearly 70 percent of interactions with climate change denial content on Facebook.&#8221;
On Twitter, Zakrzewski gushed, &#8220;The nonprofit has been effective in drawing policymakers&#8217; attention to falsehoods on social media, as it did with its &#8216;disinformation dozen&#8217; report earlier this year.&#8221;
The Post reporter avoided any evidence of &#8220;falsehoods&#8221; by engaging with conservative articles. She blithely wrote that, &#8220;For years, Facebook has faced pressure to issue a broad ban on climate misinformation,&#8221; and that somehow doesn&#8217;t strike her as distasteful censorship.
My column on ClimateDepot founder Marc Morano&#8217;s book &#8220;Green Fraud&#8221; was pictured under the Daily Wire section of the report. The MRC section is illustrated with a Joseph Vazquez article on NewsBusters about &#8230; Marc Morano. He&#8217;s apparently Digital Hater No. 1.
In my Morano column, I noted that the climate panic lobby is never held accountable for failed predictions of doom from decades ago. In one PBS series called &#8220;Race to Save the Planet,&#8221; Meryl Streep claimed, &#8220;By the year 2000 — that&#8217;s less than 10 years away — the earth&#8217;s climate will be warmer than it&#8217;s been in over 100,000 years. If we don&#8217;t do something, there&#8217;ll be enormous calamities in a very short time.&#8221;
In 2021, that can be defined as climate misinformation.
But panic helps Democrats sell a crackdown. The Post story quoted Sen. Sheldon &#8220;Whites Only&#8221; Whitehouse complaining, &#8220;Facebook and other social media companies make money when they send users down rabbit holes of climate change denial. That&#8217;s a very dangerous business model for the future of the planet.&#8221;
Apparently, the &#8220;business model&#8221; is this: Only the leftists get to talk on climate policy; everyone else should be suppressed. No one is allowed to question the failed predictions and overwrought &#8220;solutions&#8221; of climate experts like Greta Thunberg and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
The Washington Post should embrace their business model with the slogan &#8220;Climate Democracy Dies in Darkness.&#8221;
The views expressed in this piece are the author&#8217;s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Smoke

GRAHAM: Climate Democracy Dies In Darkness

Censorship

Climate Change

In the last days before Election Day, The Associated Press seems befuddled. One article was headlined, &#8220;Biden easily won Virginia. Why is McAuliffe struggling?&#8221; Is this really a brainteaser?
With the public polls showing a toss-up, AP&#8217;s Steve Peoples channeled the fears of Democrats that former Gov. Terry McAuliffe could lose to first-time candidate Glenn Youngkin, and the &#8220;finger-pointing and handwringing has begun.&#8221; And &#8220;McAuliffe&#8217;s hyper-focus on former President Donald Trump may not energize voters.&#8221; Did they overestimate the appeal of McAuliffe&#8217;s experience?
For Republicans, this is the best line: &#8220;A McAuliffe loss on Tuesday would reverberate across the national political landscape, likely triggering all-out panic among Democrats.&#8221; AP is not alone on this. Washington Post columnist Dan Balz also said, &#8220;if McAuliffe were to lose the race or even win narrowly, Democratic worries about 2022 would increase dramatically.&#8221;
These journalists know Democrat panic. They can feel it in their own offices.
The AP writer admitted the obvious: McAuliffe suffered when he &#8220;quipped&#8221; that &#8220;I don&#8217;t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.&#8221; This is especially awkward since many parents home-school or put their kids in private schools. McAuliffe went to private schools, as did his children. AP didn&#8217;t mention that little personal detail.
Youngkin was discussing parents in Virginia objecting to requiring their children to read sexually explicit literature — in one case, the Toni Morrison novel &#8220;Beloved,&#8221; which includes harrowing scenes of rape and forced fellatio.
McAuliffe vetoed a bill to allow not a &#8220;ban&#8221; on the book, but to let students &#8220;opt out&#8221; of explicit materials, which he somehow compared to censorship. &#8220;I&#8217;m not going to let parents come into schools and actually take books out, make their own decision,&#8221; McAuliffe claimed in the debate.
This ties into actual sexual assaults in the high schools of Loudoun County, but Peoples and other AP reporters sounded a note of fearmongering in an Oct. 25 story. It began, &#8220;Glenn Youngkin wants voters in Virginia to hear an urgent message: Your children are in danger. In a speech in Northern Virginia&#8217;s suburbs last week, the Republican candidate for governor highlighted the murky case of a student who allegedly committed sex crimes in two area schools.&#8221;
Murky? On the same day, a Loudoun County judge ruled the assault occurred.
A quick search of AP archives in 2018 shows their reporters never used the word &#8220;murky&#8221; to describe Christine Blasey Ford&#8217;s completely unproven charges of sexual assault by a teenage Brett Kavanaugh. They did report, however, &#8220;the conservative jurist&#8217;s prospects of Senate confirmation remained murky.&#8221;
Peoples and his AP team added, &#8220;Youngkin&#8217;s final-days focus on sexual predators in schools, hardly a widespread issue, will test the limits of his suburban outreach,&#8221; and, &#8220;Youngkin&#8217;s dark message represents a new front in his monthslong push to repair the Republican Party&#8217;s standing in the suburbs&#8221; after Trump.
You can guess the AP didn&#8217;t describe the Democrats in the Kavanaugh hearings claiming rape was a &#8220;dark message&#8221; or &#8220;hardly a widespread issue.&#8221;
AP did find 32-year-old mom Briana Howard, who &#8220;said she typically votes for Democrats and voted for Biden last year,&#8221; but is now &#8220;supporting Youngkin because of his stance on education and her frustration with Democrats, who she feels have catered to teachers unions instead of families.&#8221;
This may underline why the AP reporters are so befuddled. They cannot imagine that a parent might feel at odds with teachers unions, especially Biden-voting parents. They think education is a solid &#8220;Democrat issue.&#8221; AP should have a few Republicans in the newsroom to keep them in better touch.
The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Voting

GRAHAM: AP Acts Puzzled That A Democrat Could Lose

Glenn Youngkin

Terry McAuliffe

Virginia

The Left claims that their most urgent battle is to save democracy, but when it comes to any questioning of the LGBT lobby, they are the ones who sound like authoritarians. The overtones are unmistakable in the &#8220;news&#8221; coverage promoting &#8220;dozens&#8221; of employees walking out of Netflix in Los Angeles on Oct. 20 in protest. The target? A popular Dave Chappelle comedy special, &#8220;The Closer.&#8221;
Tens of thousands of anti-abortion advocates can assemble and be ignored, but assemble two dozen transgender lobbyists and NBC and PBS will treat it as momentous.
Take NBC&#8217;s story. Anchor Lester Holt began: &#8220;A battle raging inside Netflix for weeks boiled over today. Employees staging a walkout in terms of the streamer&#8217;s latest Dave Chappelle special in which the comedian mocks transgender people.&#8221;
Reporter Steve Patterson began: &#8220;Tonight, Netflix employees walking out of the company&#8217;s Hollywood office after weeks of internal backlash.&#8221; They didn&#8217;t specify a number of protesters. But the story had all sound bites from one side: the LGBT side. That&#8217;s unless you count them reading a quote from Netflix CEO/Obama money man Ted Sarandos apologizing profusely for &#8220;screwing up&#8221; with the outraged radical employees.
NBC featured two angry trans activist sound bites and two sound bites of openly gay Variety &#8220;reporter&#8221; Matt Donnelly, who acted more like a spokesman for the protesters. He said Sarandos originally &#8220;did not feel it was hate speech, which went down incredibly badly with Netflix&#8217;s trans and LGBTQ-plus employees.&#8221; NBC noted the in-house protesters made a list of demands, and Donnelly added, &#8220;I think that Netflix is going to have to put its money where its mouth is. This specific bloc of employees are galvanized to continue to hold them accountable.&#8221;
For what? NBC&#8217;s stilted story failed to offer one clip or quote or explanation of what Chappelle said that was offensive. We can guess it&#8217;s because the comedian said &#8220;gender is a fact,&#8221; and, &#8220;Every human being on Earth had to pass through the legs of a woman to be on Earth. That is a fact.&#8221; Is that somehow too horrific for NBC to include?
NBC also shamelessly failed to report that there were counterprotesters sticking up for Chappelle right there at this walkout. In the video, you can briefly see a protester holding up a &#8220;Jokes Are Funny&#8221; sign, but otherwise, NBC couldn&#8217;t offer one hint of dissent.
Over on the &#8220;PBS NewsHour,&#8221; anchor Amna Nawaz displayed the taxpayer-funded network&#8217;s allegiances by putting on trans woman Imara Jones of TransLash Media. No debate allowed. Nawaz attempted one question about free speech in comedy. &#8220;They just say comedy is supposed to be provocative. Shouldn&#8217;t there be a space for that?&#8221;
Jones fiercely said there&#8217;s no space for that. &#8220;Well, it&#8217;s also supposed to be intelligent. And there&#8217;s nothing intelligent about mocking trans people. There&#8217;s nothing interesting or provocative about mocking trans people.&#8221; She argued Chappelle offered &#8220;essentially hate speech disguised as jokes.&#8221;
So, stating that human babies come out of women is &#8220;hate speech.&#8221;
Right before her comedy question, Nawaz assisted Jones by offering gay-lobby estimates. &#8220;The data does speak volumes here. According to Human Rights Campaign, 2021 is set to be the most violent year on record for transgender and gender-nonconforming people.&#8221; Make a joke and you&#8217;re responsible for murder?
Jones concluded, &#8220;Netflix may become a stigma brand. That is to say, it may no longer be a place where you&#8217;re proud to say that you work&#8230; Netflix could be in real trouble.&#8221; And so our &#8220;free speech&#8221; media offers themselves as eager allies with trans tyranny over what kind of speech can be allowed.
The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Netflix

GRAHAM: ‘Free Speech’ Media Allies With Transgender Tyranny

Dave Chapelle

Leftists

Transgender

If we sat in a boardroom and tried to decide the kind of story that the liberal media is the most hostile to covering — hostile to the point of wishing it had never existed — it may be this: Teenage boy describing himself as &#8220;gender-fluid&#8221; accused of raping a girl in a high school bathroom.
This is a story that any liberal media outlet would want to spike, censor, ignore, squelch and bury six feet underground. It&#8217;s a vivid illustration of what liberals consider a false stereotype. They assume automatically, ideologically, this could never happen — that a sexual predator would proclaim himself gender-fluid and enter a bathroom or locker room to commit a sex crime.
It&#8217;s a right-wing &#8220;lie&#8221; that suddenly became real.
The Daily Wire broke this story. Fox News went wide with it. The liberal networks did nothing. At Stone Bridge High School in Loudoun County, Virginia, where the school board&#8217;s policy on &#8220;gender expression&#8221; is highly controversial with parents, a ninth grade girl was allegedly raped in a school bathroom by a so-called gender-fluid male student wearing a skirt.
This occurred on May 28. On June 22, as parents protested the county&#8217;s gender policies, Scott Smith, the parent of the allegedly assaulted girl, was arrested during a Loudoun County school board meeting as he attempted to speak. The video went viral. At that meeting, school board member Beth Barts typically painted bathroom safety concerns as paranoia. Superintendent Scott Ziegler replied, &#8220;To my knowledge, we don&#8217;t have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms.&#8221;
This was obviously false, but school officials concealed it. On Fox&#8217;s &#8220;The Ingraham Angle,&#8221; Smith said he didn&#8217;t go public with his daughter&#8217;s plight because he was told it would prevent justice in her case.
On Oct. 6 came the newest outrage. The boy in the Stone Bridge incident was charged with sexual battery and abduction for another incident in a different Loudoun County high school after police say he forced a girl into an empty classroom. On Oct. 14, the school board insisted in a statement that &#8220;members of the Loudoun County school board were not aware of the specific details of this incident until it was reported in media outlets earlier this week.&#8221;
The Washington Post arrived on the scene late in the evening of Oct. 13. Despite having a story with three reporter bylines, the Post still ignored crucial context. There was no mention of a gender-fluid offender, or any mention of the conflict in county school board meetings over their politically correct &#8220;gender expression&#8221; policy.
Back in August, the Post quoted school board member Ian Serotkin telling the conservatives they weren&#8217;t against bullying: &#8220;You seem to imply that bullying and harassment of our LGBTQ students is a thing of the past. I don&#8217;t know how you can say that with a straight face, I&#8217;m sorry.&#8221;
We understand that it&#8217;s now considered &#8220;bullying&#8221; to resist using the new names or pronouns selected by the gender-nonconforming. But how can the anti-bullying forces not be sensitive to sexual assault of students? Let&#8217;s ask them: Who is &#8220;marginalized&#8221; in a rape?
The national media is very selective in covering local crimes. Stories of police brutality can quickly become an enormous national cause, but brutality against police is not (unless it was Jan. 6). A horrible abortionist&#8217;s malpractice is a local story, but restricting access to abortion anywhere goes national. This shocking assault doesn&#8217;t match the LGBTQ &#8220;narrative.&#8221; In fact, it&#8217;s the exact opposite. Bias by omission seems mandatory.
The views expressed in this piece are the author&#8217;s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Bathroom sign

GRAHAM: The Teenage Girl Who Shall Not Be Mentioned

Loudoun County

When is a fake setting not a fake setting? When President Joe Biden sits in front of it.
The &#8220;independent fact-checkers,&#8221; a phrase that in itself strains credulity, leaped to defend Biden after he received a COVID booster shot in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on Sept. 27. For political rookies, the EEOB is not the White House, but sits next to the White House.
Jokers on Facebook showed a photograph of Biden getting his booster vaccination in the South Court Auditorium in front of a set that resembled the Oval Office. One said, &#8220;Joe Biden using a fake White House backdrop is so on brand for him.&#8221; Another Facebook post said, &#8220;They created a fake set for Biden to get his booster shot. The entire Biden presidency is one giant charade.&#8221;
PolitiFact characterized the second post as &#8220;False&#8221; and announced these posts &#8220;were flagged as part of Facebook&#8217;s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed.&#8221; This led Facebook to suppress the Biden mockery. The Facebook post from the page &#8220;Cloyd Rivers&#8221; quoted here as &#8220;False&#8221; was simply taken down. It can no longer be found.
What was &#8220;misinformation&#8221;? PolitiFact&#8217;s Louis Jacobson set the Biden scene: &#8220;Behind him was a backdrop featuring white walls and columns, along with &#8216;windows&#8217; seemingly looking out toward the White House itself.&#8221;
Dear Jacobson: If you&#8217;re putting the word &#8220;windows&#8221; in quotation marks, it can be mocked as a fake set.
Jacobson also tried these lame arguments: &#8220;There&#8217;s no indication that anyone in the Biden administration tried to pass this off event as being held inside the White House itself.&#8221; Claiming great intentions isn&#8217;t &#8220;fact-checking.&#8221; It appeared to be like the Oval Office, and it wasn&#8217;t.
And: &#8220;The backdrop behind Biden as he was getting his booster shot wasn&#8217;t &#8216;created&#8217; for that event — it had been used five days earlier for a global coronavirus summit.&#8221; So if the fake setting is not new, it&#8217;s not fake?
PolitiFact wasn&#8217;t alone. The website Lead Stories, heavily used to suppress Facebook content, ran an article, too. It warned of the claim that was in an article called, &#8220;Joe Biden Took His Booster Shot On A &#8216;Set&#8217; Of A Fake &#8216;White House.’” But it was a set, and the set was technically not in the White House.
Former CNN employee Dana Ford was the unpaid Biden helper on this Lead Stories item: &#8220;Did the White House set up a fake scene to deceive the public about President Joe Biden&#8217;s COVID-19 booster shot? No, that&#8217;s not true.&#8221; She had the same lame points as PolitiFact. It was labeled for the press as the EEOB; the fake set had been used for an earlier COVID media event.
Ford added, &#8220;The article&#8217;s claims sit comfortably within conspiracy theories around Biden being photo edited into presidential offices and backgrounds as he is not really the president.&#8221;
Oh, he&#8217;s really the president, and he&#8217;s really surrounded by a cyber-Secret Service in the &#8220;fact-checker&#8221; community. You can&#8217;t even make fun of Biden without getting suppressed.
The obvious question one may ask: Why not get the booster shot inside the actual Oval Office? Why create a set for &#8220;The President Biden Show&#8221;? On Fox News, Ari Fleischer suggested they wanted to give Biden a teleprompter inside the camera lens he&#8217;s looking into so he doesn&#8217;t go off script.
If Donald Trump had created a set, there&#8217;s no way &#8220;fact-checkers&#8221; would check anyone making fun of him on Facebook. Anti-Trump mockery was the most accurate mockery, no matter how inaccurate it might be.
The views expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Joe Biden

GRAHAM: White House Fakery Defended By ‘Fact-Checkers’

Fact Check

President Joe Biden ran for president, in part, on the idea of being a national unifier — someone who could work across the aisle and strike a bipartisan compromise. But that&#8217;s not at all the way he&#8217;s governing. The media is fine with it. They&#8217;re rooting for routing Republicans.
Let&#8217;s recall Biden&#8217;s speech at his party&#8217;s national convention in 2020. &#8220;But while I will be a Democratic candidate, I will be an American president. I will work as hard for those who didn&#8217;t support me as I will for those who did. That&#8217;s the job of a president. To represent all of us, not just our base or our party. This is not a partisan moment. This must be an American moment.&#8221;
Twenty years ago, in a similar situation, Democrats inside the news media insisted George W. Bush was going to need to govern as a moderate. Winning by a whisker means he had zero mandate to do anything. They wanted him to follow his father&#8217;s example and cave to the opposing party.
This was ABC&#8217;s George Stephanopoulos on Inauguration Day: &#8220;With a 50-50 Senate and a tiny margin in the House and a majority in the country who actually voted against President Bush, he&#8217;ll be able to fulfill that central promise of unifying the country only if he&#8217;s willing to compromise on some of the big issues.&#8221;
But today, the growing expectation that Democrats will lose control of Congress is creating a sense of desperation that requires &#8220;bold&#8221; socialist action. In March, the same Stephanopoulos lectured Biden that the Republicans weren&#8217;t going to vote for his agenda: &#8220;I know you&#8217;ve been reluctant to do away with the filibuster. Aren&#8217;t you going to have to choose between preserving the filibuster and advancing your agenda?&#8221;
The Democrats not only shouldn&#8217;t compromise, but they should nuke the filibuster and pass things 51 to 50, with Vice President Kamala Harris breaking the tie. Sadly for them, Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema support keeping the filibuster.
This angers &#8220;objective&#8221; journalists such as MSNBC&#8217;s Andrea Mitchell, who echoes the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez crowd, demanding that Sinema needs to toe the line: &#8220;A lot of the House members are saying now that Joe Biden can&#8217;t be asking, &#8216;What can I do for you?&#8217; The President has to be saying to her, &#8216;I am your president, you&#8217;re about to take down my presidency, and you&#8217;ve gotta get in line.'&#8221;
Republican mavericks are cherished; Democrat mavericks are despised. Republicans are only useful if they help Democrats with their goals. Democrats are only useful if they help Democrats with their goals. Four years ago on MSNBC, disgraced anchorman Brian Williams proclaimed John McCain was a &#8220;profile in courage&#8221; for defying Trump and preventing a repeal of Obamacare.
On Twitter, columnist Eddie Zipperer offered two contrasting New York Times headlines on senators from Arizona. Back in 2018, during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings, it was, &#8220;How Jeff Flake May Have Saved Republicans From Themselves.&#8221; In the present day, the Times’ emphasis was, &#8220;Kyrsten Sinema Is at the Center of It All. Some Arizonans Wish She Weren&#8217;t.&#8221;
The &#8220;some&#8221; are hardcore Democrats. The Times is promoting an internal revolt against Sinema as she stands in the way of &#8220;a vast Democratic effort to remake America&#8217;s social safety net.&#8221;
The media elites, like Biden, pretend to be bipartisan unifiers in occasional bursts of public rhetoric, but their behavior &#8220;in office&#8221; (in the newsroom) is entirely different. They don&#8217;t participate in politics as moderators or referees. They are aggressive players, pushing Democrats around like Mitchell. Get in line, or get out!
The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

News anchors

GRAHAM: The Media Roots For Routing Republicans

Joe Manchin

Kyrsten Sinema

Legacy Media

New York Times

Twitter makes it easy to realize that the purpose of &#8220;fact-checkers&#8221; is most commonly rushing to defend President Joe Biden from misinterpretation&#8230; and mockery.
On Sept. 20, Twitter warned, &#8220;A video of President Biden discussing hurricane preparedness has been edited out of context, according to fact-checkers.&#8221;
Tweets aired this clip of Biden from Aug. 10: &#8220;Let me be clear: If you&#8217;re in a state where hurricanes often strike — like Florida or the Gulf Coast or into Texas — a vital part of preparing for hurricane season is to get vaccinated now.&#8221;
It&#8217;s easy to see his point: You may not want to be stuck in a shelter while you&#8217;re unvaccinated. But it does sound a little funny that your &#8220;vital preparations&#8221; would be: board up the house, batten down the hatches and then get the shot. It sounds like &#8220;insert a plea for vaccination in every public statement.&#8221;
This message was later mocked with humor and sarcasm, and the protective &#8220;fact-checkers&#8221; are very sensitive about viral hot takes against Biden. Twitter cited &#8220;fact checks&#8221; from Snopes, the Associated Press and PolitiFact. Line them up!
Twitter also added to the thread a Reuters dispatch from Aug. 10, which reported, &#8220;The president said a spike in COVID-19 infections would exacerbate the already difficult challenges involved in preparing for hurricane season, adding: &#8216;It&#8217;s likely serious hurricanes are going to come this month.'&#8221;
They added, &#8220;Biden&#8217;s remarks echo hurricane preparedness tips published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.&#8221; Twitter wants us to understand all the experts and facts inevitably line up for Biden.
It had an &#8220;all hands on deck&#8221; sound to it. Everyone leapt on defense. The defense was plausible, but the energy felt very personal.
Snopes cited a tweet from the account &#8220;Rich Kids of Tehran&#8221; that included the video clip and the words, &#8220;Biden: Get vaccinated to protect yourselves from hurricanes! This is the leader of the world&#8217;s most powerful country!&#8221; Biden&#8217;s actual message is there. But then they mocked it with a clip from the movie &#8220;Billy Madison&#8221; about how dumb Biden sounds. Snopes declared, &#8220;Biden did not say that vaccines protect people from hurricanes.&#8221;
AP was protesting a TikTok video — something popular with young people. This video also ran the Biden sentence and then joked in text at the bottom of the video, &#8220;Get vaccinated to protect yourselves from hurricanes y&#8217;all.&#8221; AP ruled: &#8220;False. The video clip, first posted on TikTok, was edited to remove key portions of Biden&#8217;s comments.&#8221;
It&#8217;s always interesting when the media complains that presidential statements and actions are edited to &#8220;remove key portions.&#8221; They&#8217;ll pretend this never happens in media coverage of Republicans.
PolitiFact also jumped on the TikTok video: &#8220;The video takes Biden of context and misleadingly captions his remarks.&#8221;
Just in the last year, Twitter has pounced on nine TikTok videos critical of Biden. On Election Day, they protested a Biden bumble: &#8220;Biden says he doesn&#8217;t need voters to get elected.&#8221; That&#8217;s the way words actually came out of his mouth — &#8220;I don&#8217;t need you to get me elected&#8221; — but they were upset it was mocked.
Their headline read, &#8220;Video misrepresents Biden&#8217;s speech in Michigan.&#8221; No, the video shows it&#8217;s what came out of his mouth, but their energy was, &#8220;You know what he meant!&#8221;
We&#8217;ve shown that Biden can uncork lies, such as calling the GOP-backed Georgia election integrity law &#8220;Jim Crow on steroids,&#8221; and get a free pass. If Twitter and their affiliated fact police were half as energetic in reviewing Biden&#8217;s remarks for false and misleading statements and missing contexts, they wouldn&#8217;t seem so transparently partisan. But their emotionally overwrought defenses are a fact that&#8217;s easily checked.
The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Twitter

GRAHAM: Twitter And The ‘Fact-Checkers’ Line Up For Biden

The &#8220;progressives&#8221; among us who fervently argue for abortion do not argue calmly or rationally when they are losing. As state legislators in Austin debated the &#8220;Texas Heartbeat Act,&#8221; outlawing abortions after a baby&#8217;s heartbeat can be detected at six weeks, Planned Parenthood boss Alexis McGill Johnson accused the bill&#8217;s backers of cruelty.
&#8220;The cruelty is the point,&#8221; she proclaimed, &#8220;and we will not let it stand.&#8221;
So the abortion conglomerate that dismembers and murders over 300,000 unborn babies for money every year is accusing someone else of engaging in cruelty. It&#8217;s cruelty to object to their cruelty.
The abortion industry can always count on TV entertainers to rally to their side with all the anger and profanity they can muster. Our so-called comedians erupted in foam-flecked attacks on the conservative legislators of Texas after the Supreme Court declined to overturn this law.
On NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Late Night with Seth Meyers,&#8221; the host bitterly complained anti-abortion advocates don&#8217;t have a majority in the Court and &#8220;they don&#8217;t give a s*** because they&#8217;re there for life. I mean, if that&#8217;s how our government is going to work, then why not just have a f***ing monarchy?&#8221;
That wasn&#8217;t the only obscene outburst on that program. Meyers also introduced a &#8220;Minute of Fury&#8221; commentary from Amber Ruffin in which she &#8220;satirically&#8221; demanded federally funded pedicures if the government owned her body. She lectured, &#8220;So don&#8217;t take charge of the biggest decision I&#8217;ll ever make in my whole life when you can&#8217;t even get me a god**** pedicure.&#8221;
On TBS, &#8220;Full Frontal&#8221; host and feminist Samantha Bee shook her fists at the Supreme Court. &#8220;If you&#8217;re taking away our reproductive rights, at least own that you&#8217;re gutless monsters.&#8221; She called the Supreme Court Republicans an &#8220;anti-p**** posse.&#8221; The cultural elite gravitate seamlessly from being &#8220;sex positive&#8221; to negating pregnancies. Bee wants America to be just like her native Canada, where you can get an abortion at any moment over nine months and government will pay for it, too.
On HBO&#8217;s &#8220;Last Week Tonight,&#8221; British import John Oliver not only raged at the American legislators and judges but at his own employers at AT&amp;T. The Left is so domineering it now insists every corporation must threaten politicians who oppose abortion. Every company is supposed to wage cultural war, and if the casualties are all under the age of birth, then so be it.
Oliver told his audience that he demanded answers from the people who pay him an estimated $8 million a year. They said they haven&#8217;t taken a public position on abortion. How dare they! &#8220;Listen, not taking a stance on this issue right now is taking a stance,&#8221; Oliver lamented. &#8220;And both-siding abortion isn&#8217;t really the PR slam dunk that they seem to think it is. Although it is certainly on brand for them. AT&amp;T clearly likes their public statements the same way that they like their cell signal: Hilariously f***ing weak.&#8221;
Moments like these make you wonder why on Earth the liberals at the Peabody Awards gave Oliver&#8217;s show a &#8220;rare second&#8221; award &#8220;for crafting a form that pushes both comedy and journalism in new, fresh, and publicly important directions.&#8221;
This is not new or fresh. This is not comedy. This is not journalism. It&#8217;s just lobbying. It&#8217;s in-your-face liberalism, which the Peabody folks have applauded repetitively as a &#8220;publicly important direction.&#8221; It&#8217;s so &#8220;publicly important&#8221; that you&#8217;re not allowed to be neutral about it. The babies have to be sacrificed on the altar of &#8220;anti-cruelty.&#8221;
The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

John Oliver

GRAHAM: ‘Comedians’ Curse And Spit At Anti-Abortion Advocates

Abortion

Hollywood

Texas

After the Labor Day weekend, Joe Scarborough sat on the set of &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; and told the Democrats that to succeed in the midterms, it was essential that they somehow repeal &#8220;40 years of Reaganism&#8221; by passing a massive expansion of government disguised as an &#8220;infrastructure&#8221; package.
&#8220;I remember hearing Biden&#8217;s speech back in April and was shocked by how sweeping it was for this supposed moderate guy from Delaware,&#8221; Scarborough proclaimed. &#8220;This will reverse 40 years of Reaganism, just like Ronald Reagan reversed 45 years of Roosevelt&#8217;s New Deal.&#8221;
Now, believers in Reaganism would look at the last five years of big spending hikes and suggest Reaganism has not exactly dominated in recent federal budgets. But that&#8217;s the framing for anyone now opposing a &#8220;historic&#8221; expansion of the state.
Scarborough insisted Democrats have to agree to pass something enormous. &#8220;(C)ompromise has to be found. They have no other choice. They have to make history or, of course, there will be no justification for them to run for re-election.&#8221;
This Scarborough segment was not unusual for TV &#8220;news&#8221; punditry. There is a tone when Democrats are in the White House and hold a majority in Congress, however narrow. Anchors, pundits, and correspondents have a tendency to talk about how Democrats succeed. It&#8217;s not unlike, say, the local sports channels on a Washington football team show: How does our team win? What do they need to improve on? In this case, how can they pass some &#8220;landmark&#8221; legislation and look &#8220;historic&#8221;? They fawn over Democrats, favor them, coach them and only fault them when the polls falter.
These networks cheered along and gave free publicity to Texas Democratic state legislators when they flew to D.C. to lobby quite hopelessly for Congress to pass the &#8220;For the People Act&#8221; federalizing election laws. Almost every strategy that Democrats attempt — even the quixotic ones — are promoted and explained by a pliant press.
Obviously, in the Trump years, these TV pundits and correspondents didn&#8217;t ask, &#8220;How do Trump and the Republicans succeed?&#8221; Instead, former President Donald Trump was treated like a horror movie monster threatening everything Americans hold dear. The Republicans were perpetually denounced for refusing to cast Trump out into the political wilderness. Four years ago, Scarborough insisted Trump was mentally unfit, &#8220;that people close to him during the campaign told me had early stages of dementia.&#8221;
He would never say anything like that about the current president.
In a similar way, Democrats are always presumed to be operating in a &#8220;mainstream&#8221; of public opinion. They&#8217;re almost never &#8220;extreme&#8221; on anything — never wildly out of touch with the public mood. The media pretends that they can speak for the masses and what they want. If anything, journalists press Democrats to take more extreme steps, such as scrapping the filibuster, to get the win.
But the Republicans receive the opposite. They have been quite routinely described as dangerously extreme on issues, and even largely popular stances, such as standing for the national anthem, are presented as wildly controversial matters that are cynically exploited.
All of this can turn out as the media would like — that they have almost hypnotized the voters into supporting a Democrat agenda. Or it always has the potential to backfire, and the media gives Democrats a false sense of security and popularity. Then, when they lose elections after going ideologically overboard, they have trouble believing that it&#8217;s a real result.
Whatever the outcome, our media cannot be expected to resemble a &#8220;referee&#8221; or a neutral observer. They can&#8217;t help but expose their rooting interest, like a streaker on the playing field of politics.
The views expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe">member</a>.

Menu

Tim Graham