Today’s question is an important one. Do you believe your government would intentionally harm you?
The question is especially pertinent after recognizing that during COVID the government and Joe Biden were trying to force every single person to inject a new vaccine into their body. Remember when they locked down businesses and wouldn’t let you go to work unless you were vaccinated?
Well now it’s all magically over. How can they just say it’s suddenly over?
It&#8217;s almost almost like it was political, but of course if it was all political, then that begs the question: would our government intentionally harm us?
It can be hard to tell if you don’t understand the way the Left uses language. With the Left, it’s always a game of euphemisms. They can make something horrible sound pretty and something deadly sound flowery.
How can we make death sound flowery? Oh, I know, we’ll call abortion ‘pro-choice.’
What’s a good flowery term for chemically castrating children to make them trans? Let’s call it ‘gender affirming care.’ Lovely.
And don’t forget ‘social justice.’ Why do we feel like we’re skipping through a field of flowers when we say social justice? What they actually mean, though, is Black Lives Matter is outside and they&#8217;re going to burn down the building in the name of social justice.
When it comes to euthanasia, the flowery phrase they like to use is ‘dying with dignity.’ If you believe ‘dying with dignity’ is only about compassion for people with terminal illnesses, think again.
There’s one country where we’re going to hear this phrase a lot more: Canada.
Let me briefly unpack Canada’s history with euthanasia.
Canada used to have a law banning assisted suicide. But in 2015, they reversed that ban and began their slide down a slippery slope. Proponents of the reversal said they were only making assisted suicide available to people who suffer from a terminal illness or whose natural death was ‘reasonably foreseeable.’
Then in 2020, the Canadian parliament went further by enacting Bill C-7, a sweeping euthanasia law that repealed the previous requirements. You no longer had to be in a terminal condition and you no longer had to be facing a ‘reasonably foreseeable’ death. Now you simply had to be someone suffering from an illness or a disability which quote “cannot be relieved under conditions that you would consider acceptable.”
Their new euphemism for it is: Medical Assistance In Dying, or &#8216;MAID.&#8217;
It only took Canadians five years to remove all the barriers to euthanasia, making it widely available. Canadian law allows both the rich and the poor to kill themselves. Either way, now you can ‘die with dignity.’ So, if you’re poor and you can’t seem to achieve a life of dignity, wouldn’t you just rather die?
Now, of course, it is already being abused. Let me give you just one example.
A man with a neurodegenerative disease testified to the Canadian parliament that nurses and a medical ethicist — whatever that is — at a hospital, allegedly tried to coerce him into killing himself by threatening to bankrupt him with extra costs. They also apparently withheld water from him for 20 days. This happened inside of a hospital.
Canada’s state-sponsored media is working hard to make people think this is a good thing, the compassionate thing to do.
Not only that, but Canadian leaders figured out they could save money. Their parliament ran the numbers and discussed the fiscal advantages of Bill C-7. By allowing euthanasia to take place they estimated they could save the country $86.9 million per year.
Now, in case you think this would never happen in America, consider how close our neighbor to the north is. The same debate is also raging across Europe, and Switzerland has already made it legal. 
Lest we forget, two women from Arizona, Susan Ammouri Frazier and Lila Ammouri, perfectly healthy sisters, told their friends and colleagues they were just going on a trip to Europe. They ended up killing themselves through euthanasia in Switzerland. A team of medical professionals assisted the women in killing themselves because they just wanted to die.
So, back to the original question: Do you think your government would intentionally harm you?
We need to deeply consider the answer to that question, because it’s our children who have to grow up in this world we&#8217;re creating.

Candace_3b16x9 copy 12

Would Your Government Ever Intentionally Harm You?

Canada

Candace Owens

Euthanasia

Readers Pass

Switzerland

The question on my mind today is: Who is your queen? Who is your king?
It’s been especially on my mind as I watched Queen Elizabeth’s funeral and black America’s subsequent reaction, which has painted Elizabeth as a murdering, complicit colonist who doesn’t deserve praise or respect.
I’ve responded to the colonialist critique many times on previous programs and interviews. And I could easily respond to it now.
I think the more fruitful discussion lies in highlighting the stark contrast of how figures, such as Queen Elizabeth, are painted by woke scolds — and therefore many members of the black community — versus who they hold up and revere as heroes for the black community.
What you’ll notice immediately is that the black heroes are often criminals or, as I’ve repeatedly pointed out, characters who can easily be painted by the media as victims of an “oppressive” system. And black enemies are often figures with outstanding character, e.g. Queen Elizabeth.
The most recent example of this dichotomy comes from Uju Ana, a Nigerian professor from Carnegie Mellon. In response to the queen’s death, she tweeted something truly disgusting, vicious, and repulsive. “I heard the chief monarch of a thieving, raping, genocidal empire is finally dying. May her pain be excruciating,” she said.
I want to focus in on the word “raping.” You would assume that — because Uju so vehemently condemned it in the case of England — she would be against it in other cases.
Do you remember Jacob Blake? He was a black man who was fatally shot after his girlfriend called law enforcement on him over a “domestic dispute.” She had previously alleged she had been — I apologize if this is too graphic — digitally raped by him.
Uju Ana had something very different to say about rape then: “Jacob Blake is a family man. His sister Letetra Widman reminds us all that he has people and he is somebody’s people. No image you paint of him erases that.”
In other words, Uju Ana — and the media with her — doesn’t care that a black woman called law enforcement because she was obviously scared for her life. Nor did she care that Blake had been accused of digital rape.
This happens over and over again.
So again, who are the people we are told we should celebrate? Who are our kings and queens?
Consider Karen Attiya, a columnist for the ultra-woke Washington Post, who had a similar response to Queen Elizabeth’s death. She tweeted, “Black and brown people around the world who were subject to horrendous cruelties and economic deprivation under British colonialism are allowed to have feelings about Queen Elizabeth. After all, they were her subjects, too.”
But what did Karen — that’s a perfect name for her — say about George Floyd? Her words for Floyd were glowing. After his death, she suggested he win “Time’s Person of the Year.”
Floyd, who’s criminal record included multiple accounts of drug use, physical assault, and theft. Floyd, who’s alleged “victimhood” did nothing but damage to the inner-city communities destroyed by subsequent riots. Floyd, who’s name was used to legislate policies that have worsened crime in those same struggling communities. I explore Floyd’s troubled history extensively in my documentary “The Greatest Lie Ever Told,” which will drop very soon.
For Karen — and therefore the media and the Left — these hurting communities and their deeply rooted problems are never the focus. It’s always boogeymen like the white queen in Britain. Or it’s “uncle tom” Candace Owens, who has the audacity to criticize the heroes they crown.
This cancer destroying black Americans extends beyond the political sphere. It’s cultural as well.
So who’s our queen in black America today?
Beyoncé, who will often sexualize herself to sell <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljceAs9WMqY">products,</a> is our new queen. And we have other idols. Rappers, who live and sing about degenerate lifestyles. What food products do we allow corporate America to sell us? Popeyes, sponsored by a wonderful role model in Megan Thee Stallion, or McDonald’s, sponsored by Travis Scott.
It’s time for black America to return to the thriving culture it had before the Left began the great welfare experiment. Believe it or not, black Americans, before the 1960s, were well married and outpacing white Americans in terms of economic growth — all while enduring Jim Crow laws.
But this fell apart when president Lyndon Baines Johnson, an avowed racist, extended a government hand and offered incentives for mothers to not marry fathers; the government became the new surrogate father.
Yes — it’s time black Americans reject the degenerate culture and crooked heroes that the Left will continue to push.
It’s time we find new kings and queens which display repute and character. Or else we will continue to be destroyed.

Candace_3b16x9 copy 14

Black America Needs To Change Or It Will Continue To Be Destroyed

Beyonce

Blacks

George Floyd

Queen Elizabeth

Washington Post

According to a test provided to students and teachers by a Wisconsin school district, it appears <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-7-generation-d-egenerate-homewrecking-model-claims-she-is-the-victim-after-alleged-affair-with-adam-levine-2">I have white privilege</a>.
This comes as a surprise to me too, for various reasons, but the most obvious being that I am not white. I am black.
I thought it’d be fitting to take one of these “white privilege tests,” which are so rampant in schools, for two reasons. One, to demonstrate how ridiculous and detrimental Critical Race Theory-inspired tests can be for children. And two, to highlight how important it is, as midterms barrel closer, to vote against progressive candidates and school boards.
It is humorous when I take a ridiculous “white privilege” test and poke holes in leftist agendas. It becomes less funny, though, when you realize tests like this one are affecting our children’s innocent and often race-less worldview, encouraging them to look at their Caucasian friends negatively, and to view their own race as something that is lesser.
This is especially impactful for me, as I have a child who will be school age in the next several years.
The first question on the test asked whether I could arrange for, or be in the company of people who were my own race. To which I responded, “yes.” Because I think everybody can choose who they want to be friends with, correct? It seems odd, and potentially racist, that this would even be a focus.
The second question asked whether, when I move to a new place, “I can be positive and confident that neighbors will be neutral or pleasant to me.” I answered “yes” here as well. Again, the question is strange. If they were talking about noisy or annoying neighbors, maybe I’d have answered “no.” There are always bothersome neighbors.
The third question asked whether “I worry about being followed to the grocery store if I’m walking there alone.” For the third time, my answer was “yes.” Are they talking about race here? Or, about simply living in a more rough or impoverished neighborhood? It’s unclear.
“I can turn on the television, or the newspaper, and see people of my race widely represented.” This is the fourth question. Again, I answered “yes.” All the time now, I see black individuals and minorities represented in commercials, TV shows, and movies. It seems like it’s a requirement at this point for casting directors and producers. Turns out the black community does have something to thank blue haired woke scolds for. 
The fifth question was a confusing one. It asked if “I could speak in public to a powerful male group, without putting my race on trial.” I do not know what a “powerful male group” is, or what specifically they are referring to here; I checked “yes” because I have no experience with my race being put on trial when speaking to “powerful male groups,” whatever that means.
And the last and final question: “I am never asked to speak for my entire racial group.” We know the answer here for me. I’m often told by others that I cannot and should not speak for the black community, being the “Uncle Tom” or “white supremacist” that I am. So, I went ahead and answered “yes” to the last question as well. 
Apparently, six affirmative answers to these questions proves that I have white privilege.
You learn something new every day.

Candace_3b16x9 copy 16

It Appears I Have White Privilege. How Do I Know? I Took A Test.

Schools

White Privilege

The Left is a death cult. And not surprisingly, it’s killing people.
My husband would always say this in the early stages of our relationship. At first, I thought he was being hyperbolic or exaggerating. Then as we talked about it at a deeper level, and I considered more thoughtfully the issues in which the Left engages, I found what he said to not only be true, but not in any way exaggerated. 
In <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-6-the-left-is-a-death-cult-and-it-s-killing-people-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">everything that the Left pushes</a>—they celebrate, advertise, and encourage death.
Take our &#8216;nice&#8217; neighbors in Canada, who increasingly foreshadow where progressives in America are heading. One of the leading causes of death in Canada is euthanasia.
The Left originally pitched, as they always do, euthanasia as &#8216;compassionate&#8217; legislation. They didn’t want people to die in pain if they didn’t have to, e.g. someone dying from cancer.
But this is not where euthanasia has stopped. We see for example, Switzerland, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/switzerland-legalizes-3-d-printed-at-home-assisted-suicide-pods" target="_blank" rel="noopener">where you can kill yourself</a> irrespective of what you’re going through. I spoke about this in March, when two perfectly healthy sisters from Arizona <a href="https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/missing-women-colleagues-left-worried-after-2-sisters-never-returned-home-from-trip-to-europe" target="_blank" rel="noopener">traveled</a> to Switzerland to commit suicide.
It’s not long before this debate rages in the United States. And the Left will predictably advocate and legislate euthanasia.
Consider another example: climate change. What’s the focus for climate change advocates? That we are all going to die in ten years. Adults and children alike are being taught that they will die unless they avoid having families, unless they get rid of their gas car, and unless they <a href="https://time.com/5942290/eat-insects-save-planet/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">eat bugs</a>. These beliefs are not only scientifically debatable; they are terribly hopeless things to be teaching a generation. But this is the world of death the Left creates.
There’s abortion too — the Left’s most sacred belief. What&#8217;s more death cult than the actual killing of babies on the altar of ego and career?
Leftist politicians, like <a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/08/28/1119502320/stacey-abrams-abortion-georgia-democrats-republicans-midterms" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Stacey Abrams</a>, justify abortion up until nine months in the womb because of &#8216;compassion.&#8217; Chrissy Teigen, model turned celebrity mother, recently <a href="https://www.fox6now.com/news/chrissy-teigen-says-her-miscarriage-was-actually-an-abortion-to-save-her-life-heartbreaking" target="_blank" rel="noopener">rebranded</a> her miscarriage from two years ago as an &#8216;abortion,&#8217; so that she could champion the “compassionate” cause of abortion rights. 
In truth, if this &#8216;compassion,&#8217; were not so effective in its goals, the black population would be double what it is today. Leftists, the supposed celebrants of black lives and culture, choose to forget this and abortion’s racist history. As I’ve asserted many times before, the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was an avowed eugenicist and racist, who spoke in front of the Ku Klux Klan and worried about &#8216;lower stock&#8217; breeding.
If the Left can’t kill our babies, then they’ll try their best to push a radical transgender agenda and corrupt their bodies instead. My colleague Matt Walsh covered this extensively in his documentary, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/what-is-a-woman" target="_blank" rel="noopener">“What is a Woman?”</a>
The Left considers it an act of aggression to say that children should not be taking puberty blockers which will affect them for the rest of their lives, and potentially render their sexual functions moot. They say that—there’s a pattern here — out of &#8216;compassion,&#8217; they prescribe Lupron to children, a drug that is used to medically castrate sex offenders. They do this to make these children &#8216;happy.&#8217;
Wrong — these children, who’ve been coerced into radical gender theory and had their bodies mutilated, will face mental health issues. And mark my words — these transitions will cut their lives shorter as well, either from health complications or suicide.
Think all of this is enough for them? No — of course not. The Left loves encouraging individuals to harm themselves in every way possible.
Which brings us to our final point of discussion — the body positivity movement, a beloved talking point for the Left. Who doesn’t want to feel positive about their body? Easy enough for all of us to agree with, right?
Then you find that the Left celebrates morbidly obese individuals. Then you find Cosmopolitan <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9131253/Row-new-plus-size-Cosmopolitan-cover-accused-glamourising-obesity.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">featuring</a> obese women on their front page, and calling them &#8216;healthy.&#8217; Then you find Lizzo, a pop singer, celebrating her obesity while accepting an Emmy <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/12/entertainment/lizzo-emmy-award-speech-cec/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">award</a>, to the applause of the death cult mob in attendance.
How sad is it that someone as talented as Lizzo, when talking to a room full of fans and celebrities that supposedly love her, is applauded when celebrating a way of living that will eventually kill her?
We talked earlier about a leading cause of death in Canada. The leading cause of death in the United States is obesity. Heart disease — often linked to obesity — is the number one killer of individuals in the United States.
Don’t be fooled by the Left’s &#8216;compassion.&#8217; As they encourage you to kill yourself mentally and physically, and to live unhealthy and unfulfilled lives, they will continue to use flowery language about their mission and goal.
It’s not compassion. It’s death. Reject the death cult, stand on the side of life.

Candace_3b16x9 copy 10

The Left Is A Death Cult And Its ‘Compassion’ Is Killing People

Chrissy Teigen

Leftists

Lizzo

America is not only considered an indulgent culture, America is an indulgent culture. 
What got me thinking about this was <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-4-my-secret-addiction-america-s-problem-with-over-indulgence-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">my own strange addiction to paper towels</a>. I realized when I cook dinner I use nearly an entire roll of paper towels. I’ve been using paper towels like a psychopath. It’s a small, indulgent behavior, but just because it’s small doesn’t mean I should be engaging in it.
And, as it turns out, I am not alone. A report from <a href="https://www.euromonitor.com/usa" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Euromonitor international</a> says the U.S. spends more on paper towels than every other country in the world combined. But to indulge &#8211; this is what we do! We use more and more, in excess and excess. We like wealth, and we like money. Perhaps this is a result of living in a free-market capitalist society, but it is definitely a result of being a part of a society that glorifies Hollywood so much.
It’s worth paying attention to where we are specifically seeing this type of indulgent culture. Enter: Lizzo.
Lizzo, to me, is so emblematic of our society of excess. In fact, she might be the first artist to be unbelievably fat and simultaneously claim that being fat is delicious. She proclaims her audience should want to be more like her — and be more fat — because it’s amazing. Whether she’s taking photos half naked in front of a private plane or sitting on the sidelines at a basketball game, she’s saying that she’s wealthy, fabulous, fat, and happy.
But Lizzo doesn’t just stop with the fact that she’s fat and happy: She thinks you should be fat, too! And people applaud her for this — all the time. They love it, and rather shockingly, they want more of it. But what is it that people are wanting more of, exactly?
Ironically, people seem to be wanting more of less. Lizzo is pitching a lack of substance and persuading her followers to want more of, well, nothing. But Instacart recognized her brand and her powers of persuasion and capitalized on them by making her the face of their company.
In their latest commercial, Instacart has Lizzo in a bathtub ordering everything her heart could possibly desire while surrounded by food, fairies, and luxury. And why is this the featured commercial? Because this. Is. America. We want more, we want excess, and what we don’t want is the truth.
Because the truth is, Lizzo isn’t actually happy — and having “more” won’t make you happy either. Lizzo is clinically obese. It’s worth recognizing how exhausting it is to carry around such weight all day.
I recently had my own experience with overindulgence. I was in Los Angeles and went to In and Out Burger. The taste was fabulous and the instant high from bad food seemed almost worth it, but afterward, I felt disgusting. Couple that with sitting on a plane for four hours, and I desperately felt like I needed to move my body. Impulsive behavior followed by instant gratification is never really worth the long-term consequences of feeling so bad.
That temporary high isn’t really happiness, but that’s what Lizzo is selling you. It’s a lie. And what Instacart is selling you is a lie. These indulgences don’t make us happier. 
Whether it’s the little rush of bad food or the short-term kick from a purchase, you don’t really have money for  it never leads to true happiness. You end up uncomfortable or financially stressed. Anxiety and angst always follow, and that’s what Lizzo experiences every day.
I do not doubt that Lizzo has to be suffering from some form of depression, if for no other reason than the amount of weight she is carrying. Her apparent happiness is a lie. This commercial is a lie. And what do these lies lead to?
When we are told that having “more” will lead to happiness, we are a society primed perfectly for socialism. Why do you think people respond so well when politicians say, “this should be free!”? Because it’s not just that we’re told we should have “more” — that “more” should be free.
And if you can’t afford it, the message becomes that it’s the upper 1% who should afford it for you because they’re the real problem anyway. They have too much! Tax them! We’re told to forget responsibility. This is someone else’s responsibility. “Give us more free stuff.”
That is the incredibly unfortunate state of American politics today. So, what’s the answer to this? Where does it end?
Well, if it’s left up to the Left, it won’t end until the irresponsible are given their “free stuff.”
So, take note, and caveat emptor.

Candace_216x9 copy 8

Lizzo, Instacart, and America’s Problem With Overindulgence

Health

Obesity

So, the question of the day is: Why are women crazy?
I can’t be the only person reading the stories in the press right now. I know, according to the Chinese zodiac calendar, this is supposed to be the Year of the Dragon, but it feels like the &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-3-how-to-spot-a-crazy-woman-2">Year of The Crazy Woman</a>.&#8221; It seems like women in America were pretending to be sane for a while &#8211; but now, they&#8217;re just going bonkers and it’s all being revealed.
First, there was Meghan Markle. Then, we covered Kim Kardashian who had us believing for two decades she was a victim. And who can forget &#8220;I&#8217;m so scared, I&#8217;m a victim&#8221; Amber Heard?
What do all of these women have in common? There are four main things to look for to spot a crazy woman:
<ol>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">She&#8217;s a feminist.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">She&#8217;s definitely a feminist.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">She over-utilizes the word &#8220;attack.&#8221;</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">She&#8217;s in a lot of problematic relationships.</li>
</ol>
We can underscore the &#8220;Year of the Crazy Woman&#8221; by looking at another recent cultural example.
Take Olivia Wilde. What do you know about Olivia Wilde? Well, the first thing you need to know is that she is a feminist. Of course, like all good feminists, Wilde sometimes gets &#8220;attacked&#8221; by men — and she usually likes to get ‘attacked’ by men when she&#8217;s trying to further her career.
So, it was convenient for her that she was going through a separation with Jason Sudeikis while producing and directing her new movie “Don&#8217;t Worry, Darling.”
While on stage at CinemaCon, a processor served Wilde papers in public — which, by the way, has happened since the beginning of time. Processors know for a fact that celebrities will at one time or another be on a red carpet. But when it happens to Wilde, it is an &#8220;attack.&#8221; An &#8220;attack,&#8221; by the way, that can be used to promote her new movie. 
After receiving the child custody documents, Wilde gave this statement:
<blockquote>“It was my workplace. In any other workplace, it would be seen as an attack. It was really upsetting. It shouldn&#8217;t have been able to happen. There was a huge breach in security, which is really scary. The hurdles that you had to jump through to get into that room with several badges, plus special COVID tests that had to be taken days in advance, which gave you wristbands that were necessary to gain access to the event — this was something that required forethought.”</blockquote>
Yes, she&#8217;s under attack, and she was really scared — because these papers were handed to her in a professional manner. She&#8217;s not a special snowflake, though. This has happened many times to other celebrities in the past. But this time it happened to a woman who is — did I mention — a feminist?
Wilde goes on to say:
<blockquote>“I hated that this nastiness distracted from the work of so many different people and the studio that I was up there representing. To try to sabotage that was really vicious. But I had a job to do. I&#8217;m not easily distracted.”</blockquote>
Oh, wow. She is just so brave. What a brave feminist woman Olivia Wilde is.
Now, weigh this against the statement from Jason Sudeikis’s which sounds totally stable:
<blockquote>“Papers were drawn up to establish jurisdiction relating to the children of Ms. Wilde and Mr. Sudeikis. Mr. Sudeikis had no prior knowledge of the time or place that the envelope would have been delivered, as this would solely be up to the process service company involved and he would never condone her being served in such an inappropriate manner.”</blockquote>
Sudeikis went on to say the same thing, and it makes him sound like a normal person. Of course he had no idea where she was going to be served. This all created a very good reason for her to go to the press and portray herself as the victim so that people would buy tickets to her movie. (Which, by the way, everyone says kind of sucks.)
But that wasn&#8217;t enough. If you can take down one man to get press, what if you take down two?
At first, Shia LaBeouf was cast as the lead in “Don&#8217;t Worry, Darling” before Harry Styles was given the role. Nobody knew the reason LaBeouf eventually left the movie. But thanks to an interview with <a href="https://variety.com/2022/film/news/olivia-wilde-denies-shia-labeouf-quit-dont-worry-darling-1235364535/">Variety</a>, we all found out.
<blockquote>“I believe that creating a safe, trusting environment is the best way to get people to do their best work. Ultimately, my responsibility is to the production and to the cast to protect them.”</blockquote>
Wilde said she didn&#8217;t want LaBeouf to be there because she could never condone the kind of individual he is — because she&#8217;s a feminist. That was the implication.
Shia LaBeouf has publicly struggled with alcoholism and drugs for quite a long time and has even been admitted to treatment centers. Perhaps the most notorious accusations came from his former girlfriend FKA twigs when she filed a lawsuit against him for abuse. This was all public.
Olivia Wilde knew all of this and she saw it as an opportunity.
Since the public didn&#8217;t know exactly why LeBoeuf was no longer in the film, she was free to say whatever she wanted. Her statement to Variety heavily implied that she dropped him because she was a feminist and would never want to condone this sort of person being on her set. She even talked about the &#8216;ethos&#8217; on her set, and how he just didn’t fit the &#8220;ethos.&#8221;
And so, of course, the public believed her story, that is until Shia LaBeouf replied. He wrote a letter in response to her interview in Variety. Apparently, what she said just wasn&#8217;t true at all. LaBeouf shared an email thread and even released a video that she sent to him where she begs him to stay in the film.
Shia LaBeouf has struggled with addiction, but he&#8217;s clean now and proven he is a different man today than he was even three years ago.
For Olivia Wilde to use Shia LaBeouf’s struggles against him to promote her new film and make herself look like the victim illustrates how deep feminist toxicity can go.
These women are narcissistic, they are problematic, and they are women to avoid. We should not be putting them on a platform.
Welcome to the &#8220;Year of The Crazy Woman.&#8221;

“Candace” Hosted By Candace Owens

Candace Owens Explains Why Olivia Wilde Is The New Queen Of Crazy

Feminism

Hollywood

Olivia Wilde

Manly men are lacking in the world today — and we need to bring them back. This is something I genuinely believe and often advocate for on my show.
It’s something which, if you’ll remember, I caught fire for saying in response to actor and musician Harry Styles, who wore a dress on the cover of Vogue. 
When was the last time you watched a movie which showed a man who loved his family and went to church regularly? And presented those as being good qualities — not qualities which make him a misogynist or “toxic male,” but an inspiration and role-model? When was the last time you saw any leftist assert the need for strong men in our society at all? 
You can’t remember because it doesn’t exist. Why? Because the Left, which controls all the main levers of society, hates the idea of strong men and the effect they have on their communities.
Because in general, strong men are important for society. Take away good, strong men, and as we’ve seen, the rest of the family begins to crumble. They are the bedrock on which civilizations are built. 
Men in World Wars
During World War I and II, the typical age of the soldier — whether it was Japanese, German, American, or British — was 18 to 20 years-old. 
The typical age for the men storming the beaches of Normandy was age 20. The men in those ships, throwing up due to the tossing of the waves, knowing they would be killed as soon as they landed — they marched on anyway, sometimes using the bodies of others, sometimes by sheer force of will. 20-year-olds. 
Back when my husband and I had Netflix — I hope you’ve all canceled it by now and subscribed to The Daily Wire for the great content and movies we’re in the business of making — there was a docuseries called “World War II in Color.” And it was basically what it sounds like: old footage of the conflict rendered for color. 
The first thought I had when I watched the documentary was how striking it is to truly see how young these men were. You hear it over and over, but then to see it in color makes it more real. 20-year-olds, scared but nonetheless showing a stunning and incredible amount of bravery. 
The second thought I had was how striking it is when comparing this bravery — the bravery of soldiers fighting a true evil in Hitler and the Nazis — to the stunning lack of bravery and cowardice existing in men today.
The Modern-Day Man
There are young 20-year-olds that, when I give speeches, shriek outside the building, upset that I’m being handed a microphone; that I am simply stating opinions they have no obligation to adhere to or even listen to. 
There are 20-year-olds still walking around with masks, scared of a pandemic that statistically barely affected or was dangerous to them. 
There are 20-year-olds who are obsessing over their self-image and who are worried about whether they are man or woman or binary or non-binary, and concerned about the misgendering that might happen if they choose a certain route. 
There are 20-year-olds who refuse to work because they deem it beneath them — they feel they are entitled to wealth. 
And there are manly men who are literally too scared and cowardly — look at who’s speaking up for them currently, a woman — to push back against radical gender ideology and feminism, and assert something which is totally normal and natural; that they are men and they like being men, and they enjoy manly things. 
Are these the men of our future? Are these the men who will build new things, protect their homeland, sacrifice for their loved ones, and raise strong and healthy families? 
The answer is obviously, no. 
The Left’s Anti-Man Agenda
The creation of these sorts of men is not by accident. There is a whole political Left that champions this detachment and dedicates their life to pushing for it — the complete destruction of strong men. 
They know that if there are no strong men, then there will be no strong families, and then there will be no strong free-thinking and brave individuals who come from those families.
Their version of justice and bravery is not heroic self-sacrifice, but a man wearing a dress. Their version of progress is no genders. Their version of the natural is the perverse. 
They hate traditional norms — husband and wife, man and woman — because these norms cut against their ideal world of non-binary, genderless, ruleless, motionless, standardless, ugly individuals. 
Even more than that, the Left knows that more barriers broken equals more easily controlled citizens. The more “gender confused” a person is, the more likely they are to rely on cultural icons and their activist teachers to lead them. The less strong men or strong women who hold Judeo-Christian values of right and wrong, the more citizens that will rely on the government and culture to dictate morality for them.
This is the mission of the Left and, as we’ve seen from the examples of our current modern men, thus far it has worked. 
The Proper Response
Now — I can already hear some conservatives responding with general disengagement at this ideology. That is what conservatives have done for years. Don’t fight the culture war; focus on policy or on foreign affairs, they say. Or simply prescribe the “live and let live mentality” to the whole argument. 
What’s the big deal if adults wear dresses? What’s the big deal if there are a few men who want to be women? Why even engage on such minor cultural items when there are bigger and more adult things to tackle? Who cares if Harry Styles wears a dress? 
The Left will make similarly libertarian arguments when criticized for their radical ideologies. Because suddenly they become less authoritarian and more libertarian in their views when they can’t argue for their position on face value. 
But to answer the question — what is wrong with adults making choices? 
Here’s what’s wrong. “Adults making choices” isn’t the Left’s game. Their game is to destroy cultural standards altogether. Their game is to blow up gender norms. Their game is to oust anyone who disagrees as homophobic, transphobic, or some other &#8220;phobic&#8221; they conjure up. 
And their game hasn’t stopped at destroying men — they’ve moved well past that. They went from breaking down men and “freeing” women to the now very scary gender-indoctrination of children.
To put it another way, this battle is no longer on the outskirts. It’s no longer silly adults making silly choices — it’s in your home now. 
They are now no longer just teaching grown adult men to ignore gender norms and to play God — they are now teaching your children to do so as well. Their mission has become even more sinister.
This ideology is parents forcing their child to wear a dress because their child happened to don it on an off-day. 
This is teachers grooming children in public schools. 
This is government entities and scientific institutions using language like “birthing persons” in their memos and on their official websites. 
This is schools, even grade schools, emailing parents to inform them that “Mother’s Day” and “Father’s Day” will no longer be celebrated because it’s not inclusive enough.  
This is doctors and trans activists injecting hormones into kids at incredibly young ages — drugs that are sometimes used to medically castrate sex offenders. 
In other words, this has become much more than a celebrity wearing a dress, or a few crazy activists on Twitter, or the destruction of strong men. It’s in your home now and it’s taking everyone it can. 
Don’t believe me? <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/what-is-a-woman">Watch</a> Matt Walsh’s new documentary “What is a Woman?” which is available exclusively to Daily Wire members. Watch as psychiatrists, lawmakers, gender studies majors, and activists refuse to define “woman.” Watch as “doctors” advocate for hormone blockers that destroy children’s bone density. Watch what happens when a whole generation destroys strong men—and therefore destroys gender and the family. 
Ignorance Is Bliss
To ignore this radical ideology is to be a fool. To stay silent is to make the same mistake that conservatives have made for the last 30 years. The only road now — and one which we should have taken a long time ago — is to enter the battle. 
Again, to say that this isn’t a battle or that you don’t like the “culture war” is to ignore what Hollywood and the Left have been doing for years. 
And their tactic is to make you feel like you are crazy, so that you will stay silent. They will call you names and condemn you and say, “Why do you even care?” 
I care because I care about the future of our society. I care about the truth. I care about our children.
It’s time we stopped taking a backseat to the Left’s all-out assault on masculinity — and therefore families. We didn’t start this fight. They did. So jump in, stay alert, be vocal, and bring back manly men.

Owens

OWENS: Bring Back Manly Men

Culture

It’s time for the black community to leave the Democratic Plantation — again. 
I’ve said it for years. And here I am saying it again: It’s time for the black community to leave the Democratic Plantation. Permanently. 
Some think I use the term “plantation” for rhetoric. Or clickbait. Or just to be offensive, loud, or noisy. Some think I use it to be racist.
None of these are true. As with everything — I say it because I mean it. And because it’s true.
There would be no outcry — there is no outcry — if someone says “Republican Plantation.” Consider when Joe Biden <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/jim-crow-2-0-is-imaginary-and-divisive">linked</a> Republican efforts to oppose Democratic election laws with “Jim Crow.” Or when the media, every day without fail, suggests that the GOP is full of racists. 
I call the Democratic party a plantation because it’s true. 
<h4>The Democratic South</h4>
In the early nineteenth century, four million blacks worked as slaves, imprisoned on plantations in the American South. The owners of these plantations were, almost without exception, Democrats.
Modern day Democrats would rather this history be erased, but it’s true. 
It’s also true that, before the Civil War, slave-owning Democrats used black people to massively increase the number of votes they got in Congress and the Electoral College. Because of the Three-Fifths Compromise, a single Democrat in Georgia who owned five slaves got four times the representation as a single white abolitionist in Pennsylvania — who didn’t own any slaves.
Yes — the party which is always bloviating about being on the “right side of history” — those same leftists, were, at one time in large part slave owners. 
<h4>Three Rules to Keeping Slaves on the Plantation</h4>
For these slave owners — again, most of whom were Democrats — there were three principles to keeping slaves enslaved.  
First, they prevented the black community from learning how to read; slave owners understood literacy and education were power. And of course, many of them legitimately thought black individuals were too dumb to learn. 
Second, they kept families apart; slaves were always being moved around for practical reasons, but also to disrupt familial bonds. Frederick Douglass, in his reflections on being a slave, speaks to this. He says he felt nothing when his mother died. Nor did he feel anything when his sister died. 
Third, if slaves tried to escape, there were extreme physical consequences; they were severely and brutally punished.
<h4>Destroying Education </h4>
Let’s fast forward to present day America. Ever since the Democrats captured the black vote, how has the education of black America improved?
It hasn’t. Per the U.S. Department of Education, 84% of black students lack proficiency in math and 85% lack proficiency in reading. That’s as of 2021.
Consider the predominantly black inner-city schools which have been notoriously bad for decades, and only continue to get worse. Who leads them? Democrats. Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit, St. Louis, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Philadelphia. All led by Democrats. And, despite these statistics, they continue to push for lowering standards, removing proficiency tests, and blocking school choice. 
Why? Apply the plantation mentality. When black children aren’t educated, where do they turn? They turn to the cultural activists vying for their attention, the likes of which prop up left-wing politicians. 
I experienced this firsthand when I went through public school. A bright girl like me came out of high school and believed that conservatives were racist and evil, and had the worst hearts. I believed that Democrats were the ones who fought for minorities. 
Heck — I came out of high school thinking that Lyndon B. Johnson, who helped pass the Civil Rights bill, was a champion for the black community. This Democrat saved black America. 
What is the man’s real history? He was an avowed racist. He used the “n-word” all the time, and allegedly said that he would have those “n-words voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” 
<h4>Does that sound like advocacy for the black community? Or does it sound eerily like a continued way for Democrats to gain power and line their pockets at the same time?</h4>
<h4>Separating Families</h4>
Take the second principle of owning slaves: The separation of families. Again, the black community has been voting overwhelmingly Democrat since the 1960s. And where has that landed our families? In 1965, Patrick Moynihan delivered his report on black America, and found that nearly 26% of black kids were born to a single parent household. It’s more than 70% now. 
This isn’t just the result of an over-bloated welfare system and bad victim-based policy. Progressives, along with feminists, LGBTQ+ activists, and every Leftist in between, make the destruction of the family their goal. Black Lives Matter — which I expose in my upcoming <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/clips/the-greatest-lie-ever-told-george-floyd-and-the-rise-of-blm-official-trailer">documentary</a> “The Greatest Lie Ever Told” — openly professed that one of their goals was to “disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family.” 
The reason for this is obvious. If the nuclear family is abolished — if strong examples of maternity and paternity inside the home are absent — young black men and women pursue it elsewhere. They pursue it on the streets. They pursue it via culture. They pursue it via progressive activism. 
Suddenly you’re taking advice from Cardi B, Jay Z, and Beyoncé, and voting for Joe Biden.
In other words, the culture becomes your teacher and the government becomes your parent. 
<h4>Cultural Punishment </h4>
The last principle of the plantation is punishment.
In the modern day, it isn’t the lash anymore; it isn’t even physical. It’s punishment through cancellation, libel, and slander. Yes — there are consequences for any black person who steps outside the established thinking today or is educated or opinionated beyond what Democrats think is allowed.
I am of course no stranger to this, but there are other, much more qualified examples. Ben Carson, a renowned brain surgeon, was ousted by the media for his politics and called “stupid.” Thomas Sowell, a great economist, was also given the same treatment, while Clarence Thomas, a brilliant lawyer, judge, and justice, continues to be torn down as nothing more than a Trump-lover who’s being manipulated by his wife. 
Even Dave Chappelle, who’s hardly Right-wing in his politics, dominated the news cycle for a span of almost three weeks. Why? Because he joked about transgender people, the current favored victim group. He crossed the line of what’s allowed for a black man.
Focus only on your oppression and how America is racist, they said. Return to your rousing speech about George Floyd, or making fun of white people. In other words, playing the victim. That’s the black man they like. 
Take an example from as far back as three decades ago. Spike Lee, who’s a radical leftist, released his signature “Do the Right Thing” in 1989 — a great film, spotlighting the complex issues of race relations and immigrants in America. Guess what the film was critiqued for? The main characters were black and poor, but there were no drugs in the movie, so therefore, to many critics, the film wasn’t realistic. 
Who are critics mostly? Democrats. Who owns the media? Democrats. 
<h4>The Black Vote and Its Power</h4>
If the Left continues to lose the black vote, their power slips; they lose their slaves and therefore their plantation. That’s why, when they feel their hold is slipping, the race baiting gets more outlandish, more ridiculous, and more psychotic. 
They know what will happen if black children receive a good education. They know what will happen if the black community shakes off their dependence on handouts. They know what will happen if black Americans refuse to see themselves as victims and embrace the opportunity this nation offers. 
In the nineteenth century, we relied on others to free us from the Democratic plantations. This time, and on this same plantation, it must be us who open our eyes and say once and for all: No more.

Candace

OWENS: Three Ways The Left Keeps Black Americans On The Democratic Plantation

Black Lives Matter

I am supposed to be on maternity leave this month as I await the birth of my second child, but the issue of Roe v. Wade being overturned is so important that I feel compelled to add my voice to the discussion.
As many of you know, for the majority of my life, I was pro-choice, but I’m now pro-life. These are the five reasons why.
<h4>Women Under Duress</h4>
Over the course of my life, I’ve seen firsthand that most women get abortions not because it’s “their choice,” but because they are under duress or because they are fearful. This is one reason I’m no longer pro-choice. 
My introduction to the topic of abortion came when I was about ten years old and a cousin of mine became pregnant. Despite how young she was — about fifteen or sixteen — she wanted to keep her child. But her family said no. In fact, her family was so determined to convince her to abort her child that they arrived to meet face to face with her and hammer into her mind that having the baby would ruin her life. There were a lot of tears — because she wanted her child. Ultimately, though, she gave in to the pressure.
My second introduction to the topic of abortion came when I was just entering high school. Another cousin of mine became pregnant. She wasn’t a teenager and she knew she wanted to keep her son, but a boyfriend didn’t want her to keep him. That boyfriend put a lot of pressure on her to have an abortion, and it escalated to the point that he broke into her home, threatening her, and trying to physically harm her to compel her to get the procedure. 
I’ve known six more women since who have gotten an abortion, and it’s always the same scenario. Moms are upset. Parents are upset. Your friends tell you that your whole life is going to be ruined. Your boyfriend tells you that you’re going to ruin his life. Women aren’t “exercising their rights,” they are operating under duress. It’s a game of peer pressure. 
The tragic reality is far from all those media depictions pretending that women are skipping into the clinic by their own free will, empowered, flowery, and leaving feeling great about ending the life of their child. No, that’s not what’s happening. You know that. I know that. 
The media is lying to you, celebrities are lying to you. They’re treating the issue of abortion like the cigarette campaign back in the ’60s. “Oh how cool, getting an abortion!” “My body, my choice!” These are forms of propaganda. They are lies. The truth is that abortions harm people. They harm women, physically and spiritually. 
<h4>Call Abortion What It Is</h4>
Another reason I’ve rejected my former pro-choice stance is that, at this point, we’re no longer debating abortion anymore. I was speaking to my husband earlier — as many of you know, he’s from the United Kingdom — and it shocks him to see how far women are going: threatening to kill Supreme Court justices, standing outside screaming like they&#8217;ve been possessed by a demon.
Take a look at this <a href="https://twitter.com/CBedfordDC/status/1540472159331573761?s=20&amp;t=6rUsQTEtv7ck4LMpilUAmA">picture</a> from outside the Supreme Court.
You have a woman who’s easily seven, eight, maybe nine months pregnant. And she&#8217;s written on her body “not yet a human.” What is that, if not a demonic possession? What sort of a woman would do that?
That’s what we&#8217;re talking about in America now. You have people who are saying that women should be allowed to get an abortion up to nine months in the womb.
I&#8217;m nine months pregnant. I&#8217;m due to give birth in a week and a half. There are people who believe that I should be able to just stroll into a clinic and have this child removed from me — this child I feel kicking in my belly every second of the day.
We&#8217;re talking about child sacrifice. In fact, it reminds me of a book that I read about Native Americans, specifically Aztecs and the horrific child and human sacrifices that took place on a mass scale. 
Now, we look back at that and we think, “That sounds so barbaric. That could never happen in society today, it&#8217;s 2022.” But in America, there are approximately 890,000 abortions per a year. Now, we&#8217;re not building some big temple and sacrificing these children to gods. Instead, we&#8217;re doing it for convenience. We’re doing it because “I&#8217;m not ready to be a mom,” or “I don&#8217;t want to be a father, so get an abortion.” “This baby will get in the way of my career.” 
That seems even worse than what the Aztecs were doing. America is unlike any other country in the world in this regard. In fact, the only country that we are similar to when it comes to our strategy of abortion is North Korea.
There is no other country in the world where you could find women who were willing to stand outside of a Supreme Court nine months pregnant and say, “No, this is not a human. You can take this out of me if you want to.” Again, we&#8217;re talking about a demonic possession – we&#8217;re not talking about abortion anymore.
<h4>The Dark History</h4>
Reason number three as to why I&#8217;m no longer pro-choice is because we were never debating abortion in the first place – we’ve always been debating eugenics. The fact that they have tried to bury the history of abortion and have tried to bury the history of Planned Parenthood makes me sick. 
Who was Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood? She was a woman who wrote about “the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks, those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”
She was the woman behind the Negro Project, which was eventually taken on by what is today known as Planned Parenthood. She was a racist and a eugenicist. She was fearful, like many progressives of her time, that if people of a lower stock began breeding, then the human race would become dysfunctional over time. She spoke in front of the Ku Klux Klan. All you have to do is look up her history.
When you study abortion’s history, look it straight in the face, you find it has alway been about eugenics. And of course, who has consistently had the highest rates of abortion? Black Americans. Black women are at the forefront and have the highest rates of abortion in the United States. And yet they try to bury that fact.
<h4>The Constitution Still Matters</h4>
A fourth reason I’ve rejected the pro-choice view is particularly relevant to what took place Friday: Roe v Wade was always unconstitutional. Maybe if our American education system could take a break from teaching foolishness like CRT and radical gender theory and confusing children, they might actually pause to teach basic civics. We have a lot of people who are running around operating under a false assumption that the Supreme Court took away their constitutional right to an abortion.
No, you&#8217;ve never had a constitutional right to an abortion. The Supreme Court does not have within its power the right to make laws. Their job is to interpret the Constitution, to take a look at state laws and determine whether or not these states are in line with the Constitution.
If you would like a constitutional amendment for abortion then you&#8217;re going to have to understand that there are only two ways constitutional amendments are made. The first is that two-thirds of both chambers of Congress vote for a constitutional amendment. The second is that you can call for a convention of the states. This requires two-thirds of state legislatures to call for a convention, propose an amendment, and then have an amendment ratified by three-fourths of the states. 
Those are the only ways that constitutional amendments can come about. The Supreme Court has no authority to do what it did in 1973 with the unconstitutional Roe ruling. That egregious overstep has finally been corrected. 
<h4>Motherhood Changes Everything</h4>
My fifth reason that I am adamantly pro-life now is because I am a woman, and, even more profoundly, because I am now a mother. Throughout my life, the government has spent so much time in initiatives via the public school system trying to erase from me my divine nature, my maternal instincts, my femininity.
But all of that arrived suddenly the moment that I became a mother. And I believe that our role as mothers and as women in this society is to fight for children and to protect children at all costs. We should never be the people screaming outside of a Supreme Court demanding the right to have 890,000 babies murdered every year. We should stand up to protect those children.
So that’s what I’m going to do. I&#8217;m going to continue to stand up for children and for families and for women who are being destroyed by this abortion industry.

OWENS: The Five Reasons Why I Went From Pro-Choice To Pro-Life

Abortion

This month I was joined on my show by Dr. Robert Malone, one of the inventors behind mRNA technology and a fierce critic of lockdown mentality and the public health establishment.
You can and should <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/episode-61-dr-robert-malone-the-truth-about-monkeypox-2">watch the interview in full, available exclusively on The Daily Wire</a>. We talk about the newest scare from Bill Gates, Dr. Fauci, and the public health establishment: Monkeypox. And we discuss what&#8217;s next in terms of public health for our country and our world after a disastrous handling and abuse of public health over Covid-19. 
My Baby Girl—A True Survivor 
As we spoke about these topics—there’s nearly an hour of us talking—I started to think of my little girl, in my womb, and how I have six weeks of pregnancy left. 
Of course, I thought about how excited and elated I am to meet her. 
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Dr. Robert Malone Addresses The Declining Trust In Public Health and the Government" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tQS98FOXr8Y?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
But I was also thinking about what I will one day tell her about this time and the craziness of our world while she was in my womb. 
How many “world events,” as the media would have you believe, she survived during this period. 
First, we had Covid-19. With the masks, and the lockdowns, and the hysteria. One vaccine. Two vaccines. Three vaccines. And don’t forget boosters. 
I received none of the vaccines and I subscribed to none of the hysteria, and my little girl, and I, survived. She survived. 
Then, Ukraine came. And we were talking about the possibility of another World War — one which my daughter, potentially, would have had to weather. 
Well, that scare, at least for now, is gone. And she still remained happy in my womb, not a care in the world. 
Then, we quickly moved to hysteria around abortion, with the leak of the Roe v. Wade decision, which still has yet to be officially released. Women were going to be placed once again under the thumb of the patriarchy, and this was the end of human rights as we know it. Or so that’s what the media said, at least.
You must, at once, march in the streets to stop it, they said. My daughter and I declined. And, once again, she survived another “world ending” event. 
Now — six weeks before my daughter is born — we have the Monkeypox scare. There have been a few outbreaks among particular groups, but already the Biden administration — and therefore their media lapdogs — decided to stoke fear about it. 
In other words, my daughter will have to survive one more vast public health “emergency” and panic before she enters the world once and for all. 
What a crazy nine months for her, and for us, right? A whole nine months and there have been world ending emergencies nearly every month along the way. 
At least per the legacy media, activists, and globalists.
The Never-Ending Fear Crisis
I see things differently. Over the 32 weeks that my daughter has been in the womb, there have been a number of threats. And my daughter survived those too. 
But the threats are not what you’d expect. The threats come from the exact same people professing they will save us from current “emergencies.”
Dr. Robert Malone in our interview — again, go watch — said it well. “It does seem like we go from fear crisis to fear crisis to fear crisis, on almost a continuous basis, weaponized by these legacy media outlets globally. And a case can be made that that is part of a scheme to control the population.”
I’ll tell my daughter, when she’s old enough to hear, how she weathered the threats of authoritarianism. How she weathered the attempts at globalism. How she weathered the attempts of a small group of elitists trying to impact every area of our life through global governance. 
It’s true — the real threat comes from individuals like Bill Gates, who coincidentally predicts and benefits from the “solutions,” i.e., vaccines for pandemics. The real threat comes from the World Health Organization encouraging sanctions, as Dr. Malone related, on countries which don’t follow their “public health” edicts. The real threat comes from individuals in the media and elsewhere who have figured out how to monopolize and weaponize public health for their own benefit and viewership. 
That’s what we are up against today, and these are the sorts of emergencies and dangers that my daughter faced while in the womb. 
Aftermath of the Abuse of Power
The perpetrators of these ongoing threats also mishandled two years of COVID-19 — and that mishandling carries serious consequences moving forward. They effectively undermined their own authority and destroyed any credibility that may have remained.  
One prescription Dr. Malone suggested for those who have contracted Monkeypox — if you were potentially at one of the gay parties which spread it — is to quarantine for 25 days and “test and trace” individuals for it. 
Of course, no need for lockdowns or masks, or any such nonsense. 
But, he did say it would be wise to quarantine for 25 days if you contracted it.  
What was my immediate reaction to this recommendation? No. I’m not going to do that. Because why? Because, with the Covid-19 pandemic, and the schemes of elites to destroy national sovereignty at all costs, I no longer trust the public health establishment. I have zero tolerance for their words or recommendations. 
They crossed a line and it doesn’t sit right with me. You can already see the Biden administration walking back their Monkeypox rhetoric. Why? Because it’s not popular. People aren’t going for it. People are done with it. 
And that’s the natural reaction after such abuse and monopolization of the public health conversation. 
The problem is — and this is something that Dr. Malone points out — what happens when there needs to be a coordinated public health response? How do you repair the credibility behind officials making public health decisions after it was ravaged by globalists, politicians, and the like looking for a power grab? 
Whatever the answer, it’s clear there needs to be a new path forward that doesn’t encourage fear. 
As Dr. Malone said, it’s clear that Bill Gates isn’t an expert in public health, because, what does he do? He leads with fear. 
And that’s the last thing we all need to do when discussing public health. As Dr. Malone expressed it, “I hope that with our discussion and with what I’ve written and the many media appearances I’ve given over the last week that we can help calm the waters and encourage people to not overreact, not be fear-driven, on both sides of the fence, for those that are supporters of these more totalitarian health measures and those who have come to lose faith in public health.” 
The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Aftermath Of The Abuse Of Power

As you may know, I am in full Mama Bear mode these days. With one toddler already and my second child due in July, I have become intensely focused on raising, protecting, nurturing, and teaching my children. 
For those of you who have kids, you know what I’m talking about. You’ve experienced firsthand how the process of becoming a parent causes a fundamental change in you. Moms, you know that before your baby even gets here you begin a process of child-proofing your home. You secure all the sockets with those plastic coverings. You take your fragile decorations out of arm’s reach. You replace sharp and precarious furniture with more kid-friendly pieces.
This is the instinct of any parent who is remotely in tune with their child’s well-being. You protect them from harm by whatever means possible. And it plays out in every area of life. You don’t give them too much sugar, you don’t let them play in the middle of the road, you don’t let them wander off with strangers.  
It is therefore astounding to me that parents who otherwise protect their children would allow them to have access to dangerous and damaging technology like social media. A couple of months ago, I made some comments about the Kim and Kanye debacle over whether or not their daughter North should be allowed to have a social media platform and presence. 
And I just can’t let this go. I want to dive deeper today with you and share three reasons why you should keep your kids off social media.
<h4>A Childhood Stolen</h4>
First, social media robs kids of their childhood. 
As human beings develop, we should be exposed to certain ideas and images at appropriate times. Kids should be allowed to be kids. The primary concern of an eight-year-old should be who is coming to her sleepover, not whether or not she should get butt implants. 
And yet this is what we are seeing with kids on social media — they’re growing up at warp speed into a twisted, perverted version of adulthood that, frankly, adults shouldn’t even aspire to.  
Childhood is precious and should be protected. Your kid should be dancing in real life, not dancing on TikTok.  
<h4>A Modern Pandora’s Box</h4>
Second, social media is devastating to your child’s emotional and physical health.  
Social platforms foster unhealthy competition, comparison, and expectations. When you give your child access to social media, you’re also opening the door for the most extreme people and ideas on the planet to enter their minds. 
Kids aren’t emotionally equipped to process and evaluate all of this input. It’s sensory overload to the max. By nature, young children are often incapable of dealing with their emotions in a reasonable manner, and social media heightens and amplifies their emotions — especially the negative ones — leaving them in a dangerous state. 
And we know it’s girls who are most vulnerable to the effects of social media. Last year, BYU released findings from a 10-year study showing that as social media use increases among girls, so does their risk for suicide. Why did it take a study to confirm this? Does anyone feel better after scrolling for hours on end? No. You feel “less than.” You feel ugly. You feel like you just need that body, that face, that bedroom, that puppy to feel like you’re enough. However those stressors affect you, they’re even more intense for children.
Giving your child social media is like handing them the keys to a sports car and saying, “Have fun!” It is remarkably unfair and irresponsible. Parents: Please do not cave and simply give your kids what they want. “It makes them happy!” you say. I don’t care if it gets them temporarily happy — in the long run, it will cause them tremendous pain. 
<h4>Don’t Do Business With People Who Don’t Deserve Your Trust</h4>
The last thing I want to point out is that by allowing your kids to use social media, you’re supporting evil corporations. 
By their own admission, social media giants recognize the devastating effects of their products when used by children. Last fall, internal research documents from Facebook were leaked to the world, revealing that Facebook was aware of the harmful effects of Instagram on teenage girls’ mental health. Despite their best attempts to keep it quiet, a whistleblower came forward and revealed the information. But honestly, the study only served to confirm what researchers (and common sense) tell us. Instagram causes girls to feel worse about their bodies, and it increases the risk of anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts. 
This infuriates me. And our society’s blind acceptance of this corruption and hypocrisy infuriates me. 
Let me ask you this: Would you eat at a restaurant that served food that would poison you? Would you buy a car from a manufacturer who knew there were dangerous flaws with its vehicles? Would you send your child to a summer camp where you knew they would be abused?
No. Because you don’t do business with people who don’t deserve your trust. And you certainly shouldn’t do business with those who can’t be trusted to take care of your children. 
Parents, you — and only you — are ultimately responsible for your child’s well-being. We live in a society that overlooks this basic fact. And I get it — a lot of people are ignorant of how harmful social media is, which is why I won’t stop talking about this issue. 
Protecting your children should be an obsession. May I suggest you develop that obsession? Protect their hearts and minds. Fight to give your child a normal life. Create a life where they can do normal third-grade or middle-school things — without the pain and pressure that social media so unnecessarily brings. 
The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Three Reasons To Keep Your Kids Off Social Media

Social Media

Over the course of the next couple of weeks, your social media timelines will be polluted with wide-ranging commentary regarding the recent and unprecedented leak of a draft opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. 
As you are likely very much aware by now, the opinion laid out the court’s intention to overturn Roe v. Wade — the decision which federalized abortion back in 1973. 
Now, after 50 years, that decision is facing review by a conservative-leaning court. 
<h4>Leftwing Contradiction and Hypocrisy </h4>
As Jack Posobiec, Michael Knowles, Carrie Sheffield, and I discussed on the panel of my show last week, which I encourage you to go <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/candace">watch in full</a>, much of the commentary you’re going to hear will be the wailing and groveling of the whole leftwing party over the remote possibility that this decision even becomes official. 
Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Reid, and a host of celebrity feminists are already on their pedestals — crying, screaming, and claiming this is an egregious attack on human rights and on women; on the unprecedented nature of it all, and how women should be able to kill babies; that such a “right” is freeing for women and is sacred. 
Yes — the right to kill babies is “sacred” to them.  
You’ll see many contradictory statements from leftwing individuals on the very idea of “woman.” Not two seconds ago, even saying that women alone can bear children was “transphobic.” Men, they said, could bear children too.
Apparently, though, that’s gone now. As my colleague Matt Walsh, author of the best-selling LGBTQ+ book Johnny the Walrus — a book which should be required reading for your child by the way — quipped: “Congrats to women for making it to the top of the victim pyramid once again. It will be a short visit. Trans people will reclaim their spot soon enough. But enjoy the stay while you&#8217;re there.”
Much of the commentary will also feature groundbreaking hypocrisy regarding “bodily autonomy” and the right to decide bodily choices for oneself. Again, not two seconds ago, leftists were advocating for the mandatory vaccination of all Americans — regardless of whether they already had immunity to Covid-19, regardless of whether they were even at risk, and regardless of constitutional rights.
Let’s bar the unvaccinated from all entertainment venues, they said. Let’s bar them from restaurants. Let’s pressure employers to force their employees to vaccinate. 
Now that Roe v. Wade is under review, though, the coin magically flipped. Freedom and privacy is essential, and snuffing out the life of another human being for your own selfish reasons is “bodily autonomy.” 
<h4>An Intentional Leak</h4>
Much of this “rage” will be perpetuated and repeated so as to encourage one thing and one thing only — mob justice. The kind that would make even Black Lives Matter rioters blush. 
That indeed is most likely why the document was leaked in the first place. To reignite the same forces that were mobilized in the Black Lives Matter riots of 2020. 
You think the George Floyd trial and Brett Kavanaugh hearings were bad? Well, you ain’t seen nothing yet. 
<h4>The “Unwoman”</h4>
What you won’t see or hear in the mainstream commentary and rage is any discussion of the “unwoman.” You won’t see or hear it in part because, well, because I made up the word. 
It’s what I use to describe what is left over after a predatory education system and culture have successfully had their way with the mind of young girls; carefully training them to reject and fight tooth and nail against the very things that make them unique, powerful, and ultimately happy.  
To put it simply, girls are being brainwashed — and have been for over thirty years — to fight against themselves, against their biology, and against the very things that make life worthwhile. 
Like family. Like children.
Be unfeminine, the “unwoman” says. Be ugly, she screeches. The only relationship women should have to children, she asserts, should be to not have them. Or to abort them. 
<h4>The Beauty of Femininity </h4>
Early in my media career, I sat down to discuss the ills of modern-day feminism with radio host Dennis Prager. 
At the time, I told him how despite all of the perceived glamor of my present life — hanging out with Kanye West, invitations to the White House, introductions to former presidents — the best part of every single day for me was coming home to my family. 
Femininity. Beauty. Fertility. These were my God-given joys.
There’s no greater music than the pitter-patter of my toddler’s feet when I get home. There’s no greater reassurance than the kicks that I feel from my little girl, who currently grows inside of my womb.
I already know her personality, like I knew my son’s when he was growing inside of me. She’s calmer, more delicate, and more sensitive.
And it’s sad and terrible that many women will never know the same.
<h4>A Sad Reality </h4>
Buried in the YouTube comments on a recent video of mine was one woman who expressed her gratitude for my critiques and openness to the joys of femininity and domesticity. I’m paraphrasing here, but what she essentially wrote was, “Thank you for taking the time to warn women about the dangers of feminism. I found out myself how much of a lie it was too late. I am now 52 years old, I am unmarried, I am childless, and I take pills every day to fight my depression.” 
Her comment broke my heart. 
And it is all the commentary you need regarding the pro-abortionists, the feminists, and the activists in our country. Because whether you are pro-choice or pro-life, when you look at the faces of rabid feminists shrieking, raging, and marching outside the Supreme Court, you’ll recognize the “unwoman.” 
The woman that has bought whole-hog the feminist lie and thus has had every bit of feminine joy stolen from her. A woman who has nothing left to offer but rage, fear, and the howl of loneliness. 
Only an “unwoman” who has spent decades fighting against her own fruitfulness can be so hateful and so broken as to march for a perceived right to kill millions more infants in the womb. 
It might sound harsh, but it’s true. Women fighting against children is unnatural and it’s demonic. The “unwoman” is unnatural and demonic. We should pray for them. We should pray especially for the younger girls and women who are being brainwashed to become like them. 
And before it’s too late, we should join the fight and support the work done by pro-feminine, pro-life, and pro-woman companies like The Daily Wire who continue to expose the propagation of the “unwoman.” 
The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Menu