From the moment the Colorado Supreme Court disqualified Donald Trump from the ballot a few months ago, it was obvious that their decision would be overturned. As I <a href="https://x.com/MattWalshShow/status/1737548394610962791?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">discussed</a> on this show at the time, there were so many flaws with the opinion, it was difficult to know where to begin. The decision ignored Donald Trump&#8217;s calls for peaceful demonstration on January 6th. It accused him of speaking in violent coded language because he was mean to some random protesters at his rallies. And then it concluded that a single Colorado bureaucrat had the power to effectively delete his entire candidacy. It&#8217;s not worth rehashing all of the details. This was a decision that any reasonably informed person knew was going to be overturned.
Unfortunately, what&#8217;s become very clear in the past 24 hours is that a very large number of people in this country are not reasonably informed. Instead, they&#8217;re told to pay attention when Rachel Maddow <a href="https://x.com/MSNBC/status/1737271726218608932?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">beams</a> into MSNBC to tell viewers that Donald Trump might soon be barred from the ballot in multiple states. They&#8217;re bombarded with junk &#8220;analysis,&#8221; like CNN&#8217;s <a href="https://twitter.com/DrewHolden360/status/1764681550271062046?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">assessment</a> that the legal case for kicking Trump off the ballot was strong. And they&#8217;re fed think-pieces from buffoons like Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe, who <a href="https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/12/no-easy-exit-ramp-for-scotus-on-trump-harvard-scholar-says/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">called</a> the Colorado Supreme Court&#8217;s decision &#8220;unassailable.&#8221;
Think about that for a second. You can get a more accurate assessment of constitutional law issues from a conservative podcast than you can from an esteemed Harvard Law professor who supposedly specializes in Constitutional Law. With as far as Harvard has fallen in the past decade or so, that may not be surprising. But it&#8217;s worth pointing out because of the implications for the rest of the country.
Millions of people listen to con artists with very fancy titles who lie to them as a matter of course. And even when these con artists are exposed — as they were yesterday — they make it very clear that they&#8217;re not backing down. We saw that again and again in the aftermath of the Supreme Court&#8217;s unanimous decision yesterday, striking down the decision by the Colorado Supreme Court.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1321-distraught-leftists-pee-on-their-own-faces-in-protest-against-supreme-court-ruling" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
I&#8217;ll begin with Keith Olbermann, who was so worked up in the aftermath of the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision that he apparently admitted to having urine all over his face. This is not an exaggeration, although I — and everyone else who happened to be using Twitter yesterday — very much wishes it were. Here&#8217;s how Keith&#8217;s day began. He <a href="https://x.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1764672353378652544?s=20">tweeted</a>, quote, &#8220;The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy. Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. And collectively the &#8216;court&#8217; has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate. It must be dissolved.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy. Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. And collectively the &quot;court&quot; has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate.
It must be dissolved.
&mdash; Keith Olbermann⌚️ (@KeithOlbermann) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1764672353378652544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
So we&#8217;re not packing the court anymore. We&#8217;re just going to get rid of the whole thing, according to Olbermann. In response, someone helpfully pointed out that the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision was unanimous. Here was the <a href="https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1764693103686942940?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reply</a>: &#8220;Cry more &#8230;. 9-0.&#8221; 
Olbermann, reading this, announced: &#8220;Those aren&#8217;t tears, Fascist. They&#8217;re urine. I&#8217;m sure you enjoy being bathed in it.&#8221;
At best, that is the single worst comeback you could possibly imagine in that circumstance. At worst, it&#8217;s an admission of exactly the kind of deviant behavior you&#8217;d expect Olbermann would engage in, all of the time. Although we can’t be sure if Olbermann pees on his own face, or if someone else does it. There are many details left obscured here, and probably for the best. 
As distressing as these thoughts may be, the truth is that Olbermann isn&#8217;t alone on the Left. In response to yesterday&#8217;s decision, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold — the woman who unilaterally tried to have Trump thrown off the ballot — also began attacking the Supreme Court. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
More lunacy from Colorado&#39;s Jena Griswold, lashing out at Clarence Thomas and bashing the Court’s &#8212; while offering fake platitudes we should be respect them.
MSNBC’s Katy Tur: “Do you think this Court is partisan?”
Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswolf (D): “I think this… <a href="https://t.co/LzVtQalKek">pic.twitter.com/LzVtQalKek</a>
&mdash; Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) <a href="https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1764718474121679178?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Just to restate how absurd this is — the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision was unanimous. It was a 9-0 vote, overturning what this secretary of state did. And instead of grappling with the implications of that, both the interviewer and the woman with the crazy eyes (Griswold) pretend as though this was a partisan decision. That&#8217;s how the question was framed, and it&#8217;s how Griswold responds. She goes off into some bizarre discussion about Clarence Thomas. They use the exact same talking points they used back when the Dobbs decision came out.
There&#8217;s a reason they&#8217;re doing this, which I&#8217;ll get into a moment. But for now it&#8217;s important to highlight some more unhinged responses to the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling — because you have to understand how truly, profoundly Donald Trump has broken these people. Elsewhere on MSNBC for example, a Slate columnist disclosed that he went rooting around the metadata of the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision. In case you&#8217;re not familiar with this process, because you&#8217;re a normal person, here&#8217;s what this columnist <a href="https://x.com/mjs_DC/status/1764720374107767190?s=20">wrote</a> on Twitter: &#8220;If you double click where it says &#8216;JJ.&#8217; at the top, then copy and paste it, that line reads: SOTOMAYOR , J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. And if you do a control-F search for &#8220;SOTOMAYOR , J., concurring in part and dissenting in part,&#8221; it highlights that same line.&#8221;
In other words, if you highlight some arbitrary portion of the opinion, you&#8217;ll find some evidence in the metadata that previously — before this opinion was published — Sonia Sotomayor may have written a dissenting opinion, instead of joining the 9-0 final majority opinion. This is a discovery that could mean a clerk made a minor mistake somewhere and then corrected it before publishing, which would not be a remotely interesting development. But it could also mean that Sonia Sotomayor changed her mind at some point in the deliberations, which also would not be a remotely interesting development.
<h4><a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a></h4>
In any event, Slate and MSNBC found this development highly interesting. Watch as the Slate columnist breathlessly informs viewers of his findings deep in the metadata of the court&#8217;s opinion:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<a href="https://twitter.com/mjs_DC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@mjs_DC</a> explains how metadata suggests that the concurring opinion by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson in the Supreme Court ruling on Trump&#39;s ballot eligibility might have initially been a dissent. <a href="https://t.co/SsJGdB3Aoc">pic.twitter.com/SsJGdB3Aoc</a>
&mdash; MSNBC Reports (@MSNBC_reports) <a href="https://twitter.com/MSNBC_reports/status/1764750568168288464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
If you listen carefully to what the Slate guy is saying, you&#8217;ll notice that he has no proof whatsoever for any of it. He doesn&#8217;t actually know that this change in the opinion was made &#8220;late&#8221; in the process. He doesn&#8217;t really know why the metadata says that Sotomayor was dissenting. It&#8217;s just speculation. And the point of it is to avoid informing viewers that actually, all of the experts you&#8217;ve heard on MSNBC for the past three months have been lying to you. Not even Sonia Sotomayor or Ketanji Brown Jackson or Amy Coney Barrett agree with them. That&#8217;s the last thing they want you to think about.
The New York Times also went into histrionics for the same reason. They published an <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/04/opinion/supreme-court-trump-colorado-constitution.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">op-ed</a> claiming that the Supreme Court had just &#8220;erased&#8221; part of the Constitution. They find it easier to make embarrassing, emotional claims than to address, in any way, all of the B.S. they&#8217;ve been peddling about this case. For people who pretend to care so much about &#8220;misinformation,&#8221; it&#8217;s striking.
The fact none of these media organizations is reflecting on this failure tells us a lot about what they&#8217;re planning. Just like we saw during Russiagate, they&#8217;re not going to acknowledge their mistakes. They&#8217;re not going to give up on their goal of removing the leading presidential candidate from the ballot — all in the name of &#8220;defending democracy.&#8221; Instead, their plan is simply to adapt, and find new ways to undermine the will of tens of millions of American voters. 
It&#8217;s important to emphasize here that four justices — Sotomayor, Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and the supposedly conservative Amy Coney Barrett — tried their hardest to preserve this possibility in yesterday&#8217;s ruling. They all suggested that, while states can&#8217;t bar Trump from the ballot, there might be a way for the federal government to do it, without an act of Congress.
What does that mean, exactly? That&#8217;s not clear. Amy Coney Barrett won&#8217;t tell us. Maybe soon enough, we&#8217;ll find out.
Until then, congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland has made it very clear that Democrats will press forward with an effort to disqualify Trump using an act of Congress. In response to the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling — which held that only Congress, rather than states, can disqualify federal officeholders for insurrection — Raksin went on television to announce that Democrats in Congress will indeed do everything they can to disqualify Donald Trump from the ballot.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Rep. Jamie Raskin reveals he is working with Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Eric Swalwell, and other Democrats to pass a bill aimed at removing the leading Republican presidential candidate from the ballot.
Is this &quot;defending democracy&quot; &amp; &quot;fighting fascism&quot;?<a href="https://t.co/OgVBx9aAAY">pic.twitter.com/OgVBx9aAAY</a>
&mdash; KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) <a href="https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1764773920719122811?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This is the same threat that Democrats made after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The thought of giving up never crosses their minds. The thought of allowing voters in each of the 50 states to make their own decisions — whether it&#8217;s about abortion, or presidential candidates — never crosses their minds, either.
If you page through the Washington Post&#8217;s <a href="https://x.com/gregg_re/status/1764690464425284026?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">comments section</a>, you&#8217;ll see that very clearly. Millions of Left-wing voters want Jamie Raskin to pass his bill, and forcibly remove Donald Trump from the ballot. And they have some very high-level support. As the podcaster Comfortably Smug <a href="https://x.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1764780412537090244?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pointed out</a> the other day, &#8220;Left Wing Dark Money groups like Fix The Court are focused on packing the court, and their former director now works for the Biden campaign.&#8221;
What this means is that, as deranged as Keith Olbermann is, he&#8217;s actually not an outlier on the Left. He&#8217;s popular because he&#8217;s willing to say what they&#8217;re thinking. He is the face of all their worst impulses and ideas. And they are so committed to winning — so committed to preventing you from voting — that they truly don&#8217;t care whether that face is drenched in urine or not.

Keith Olbermann

Distraught Leftists Pee On Their Own Faces In Protest Against Supreme Court Ruling

Colorado

Donald Trump

Matt Walsh

MSNBC

Opinion

Readers Pass

Megyn Kelly reduced former ESPN host and hard-Left commentator Keith Olbermann to rubble after Olbermann derided her for giving cheer to Tucker Carlson.
The sequence of events leading to Kelly’s evisceration of Olbermann began when the hosts of “The View” mocked Carlson after his departure, prompting Kelly to tweet, “Not one of these women could solo host a show and get ratings. Not one. They are &amp; will always be ensemble players. Their jealousy is on full display here, and ideological hatred too of course.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Not one of these women could solo host a show and get ratings. Not one. They are &amp; will always be ensemble players. Their jealousy is on full display here, and ideological hatred too of course. <a href="https://t.co/UvgB5bNfYT">https://t.co/UvgB5bNfYT</a>
&mdash; Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) <a href="https://twitter.com/megynkelly/status/1650569435474714646?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Olbermann then attempted to mock Kelly, writing, “What would you know about successfully hosting a show? Fired by Fox, fired by NBC. You&#8217;re 0-for-2 and you couldn&#8217;t get a job cleaning the studio at The View.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
What would you know about successfully hosting a show? Fired by Fox, fired by NBC. You&#39;re 0-for-2 and you couldn&#39;t get a job cleaning the studio at The View
&mdash; Keith Olbermann↙️ (@KeithOlbermann) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1650751300835876865?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Kelly then blistered Olbermann on her podcast, The Megyn Kelly Show, stating, “Even Keith Olbermann was saying similar things, comparing Tucker to a Nazi. He also, for good measure, decided to tweet about me, because I said Tucker is gonna be better off without Fox, and said something to the effect of, &#8216;You got fired from Fox and NBC. What would you know about it?’&#8221;
“So, first of all, you misstate the circumstances of my departure from NBC, sir,” Kelly continued. “That’s all I’m allowed to say about it. And as for Fox, there were widely-reported facts that I was offered $100 million to stay there.”
Then Kelly went straight for the jugular: &#8220;But the record’s very clear that I left voluntarily because I wanted to raise my family — something that you don’t know anything about, because no one would marry you, and you have no children. You have a cold, lonely life in which you’ve become a bitter, bitter man, something I wouldn’t know anything about because my life is joyful and I’ve managed to raise my own children.&#8221;
“And someday, I hope you have that pleasure. But I don’t have high hopes it’s gonna happen,” she concluded.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
OMG <a href="https://twitter.com/megynkelly?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@megynkelly</a> just dragged Keith Olbermann over a field of broken glass and then helped him wash his wounds with salty lemon water before pushing him down a flight of stairs. 😂😂😂 <a href="https://t.co/VQHxxxON6k">pic.twitter.com/VQHxxxON6k</a>
&mdash; Greg 🇺🇸🇬🇷🏳️‍🌈🤴🏻👑🍿🍿🍿🍿 (@gregissnacking) <a href="https://twitter.com/gregissnacking/status/1651064749977751557?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Last December, after Olbermann devoted an entire podcast to revolve around accusing his former girlfriend, MSNBC’s Katy Tur, of physical abuse and other actions, Kelly <a href="https://nypost.com/2022/12/07/megyn-kelly-blasts-keith-olbermann-over-bitter-rant-against-ex-katy-tur-terrible-person/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">declared</a>, “It just leads him down a lane where he decided to tell about 25 secrets about Katy Tur. The segment is called something like ‘secrets I said I’d never tell.’ Well, that’s a great name for a segment, but it really makes you a terrible person.”
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/hey-hey-hey-goodbye-the-view-women-laugh-mock-tucker-after-his-exit">‘Hey, Hey, Hey, Goodbye’: ‘The View’ Women Laugh, Mock Tucker After His Exit</a>

Collage Maker-27-Apr-2023-08-11-AM-354

Megyn Kelly Nukes Keith Olbermann After He Slams Her For Cheering Tucker Carlson On

Media

Megyn Kelly

Tucker Carlson

U.S.

Keith Olbermann suggested on Thursday that the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision striking down a New York gun control measure was grounds for dissolving the body entirely.
Olbermann argued in a series of tweets that in addition to dissolving the nation&#8217;s highest court, the state should ignore the <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/breaking-scotus-strikes-down-new-york-concealed-carry-restrictions-restrictions/">decision</a> handed down in <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf">New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen</a> — which held that a New York law restricting concealed carry permits violated the 14th Amendment in addition to the spirit of the 2nd Amendment.
&#8220;It has become necessary to dissolve the Supreme Court of the United States. The first step is for a state the &#8216;court&#8217; has now forced guns upon, to ignore this ruling. Great. You&#8217;re a court? Why and how do think you can enforce your rulings?&#8221; <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/keith-olbermann-the-amy-coney-barretts-must-be-prosecuted-and-convicted-and-removed-from-our-society/">Olbermann</a> tweeted, adding the hashtag #Ignorethecourt.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
It has become necessary to dissolve the Supreme Court of the United States. 
The first step is for a state the &quot;court&quot; has now forced guns upon, to ignore this ruling.
Great. You&#39;re a court? Why and how do think you can enforce your rulings?<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IgnoreTheCourt?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IgnoreTheCourt</a>
&mdash; Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1539983585406484480?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Also, f*** Alito, Thomas, Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and the paralegal Coney Barrett,&#8221; Olbermann <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1539984529074622465">continued</a>, taking particular aim at Justice Amy Coney Barrett — notably the only female justice to sign on to that decision.
Olbermann proceeded to mock the Court, suggesting that as an institution it had no power to &#8220;enforce&#8221; any ruling it handed down.
&#8220;Hey SCOTUS, send the SCOTUS army here to enforce your ruling, you House of Lords radicals pretending to be a court,&#8221; he said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Hey SCOTUS, send the SCOTUS army here to enforce your ruling, you House of Lords radicals pretending to be a court. <a href="https://t.co/cNv07AuSMR">https://t.co/cNv07AuSMR</a>
&mdash; Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1539985556574294026?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Critics were quick to respond to Olbermann, accusing him of calling for rebellion and suggesting that the entire system should be scrapped over a decision he didn&#8217;t like.
&#8220;It is a federal offense to incite rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof,&#8221; Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) <a href="https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1540042961592918017">tweeted</a>.
&#8220;Call for a rebellion against federal authority and destruction of a key institution of American government—and Dobbs hasn’t even been handed down yet,&#8221; Rich Lowry <a href="https://twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1540040229049999364">added</a>.
Actor Adam Baldwin <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamBaldwin/status/1540019896418914304">chimed in</a> with a &#8216;Jeopardy&#8217;-themed crack: &#8220;Seditious incitement to insurrection for $200 please, Mayim.&#8221;
&#8220;When people like Keith Olbermann don&#8217;t like the decison [sic], they support overthrowing the entire institution. This is exactly what you believe if you have zero respect for democracy or the Constitution,&#8221; international security professor Max Abrahms <a href="https://twitter.com/MaxAbrahms/status/1540075373433585664">commented</a>.
Olbermann kept going, however, throwing in his own interpretation of the Second Amendment.
&#8220;This would be a good moment to remind new readers that the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with gun ownership, private or otherwise. The constitution and the amendments teem with property references. Yet, the word &#8216;own&#8217; is not in the 2A &#8211; nor is any synonym,&#8221; he <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1540047452421722114">said</a>.
Critics responded by sharing the text of the Second Amendment — specifically the words &#8220;keep and bear arms&#8221; — and then followed that with a number of replies defining the word &#8220;keep.&#8221;

Keith Olbermann Proposes Drastic ‘Solution’ After SCOTUS NY Gun Ruling

Keith Olbermann Wants To Dissolve SCOTUS Over NY Concealed Carry Ruling

Gun Control

Second Amendment

Supreme Court

Maybe now they know how conservatives on Twitter feel.
After a final deal was announced Monday about billionaire Elon Musk buying Twitter, a slew of liberals came out to bemoan lost followers.
“Just lost 2000 followers. Anyone else losing followers?” Neera Tanden, a Biden nominee who withdrew and longtime supporter of Hillary Clinton, wrote on Twitter.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Just lost 2000 followers. Anyone else losing followers?
&mdash; Neera Tanden🌻 (@neeratanden) <a href="https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/1518718919242133504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Gun control activist David Hogg joined in the sobfest, saying, &#8220;Oh I thought it was just some really bad takes I posted but guess I’m not alone -3000 today.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Oh I thought it was just some really bad takes I posted but guess I&#39;m not alone -3000 today
&mdash; David Hogg 🌻 (@davidhogg111) <a href="https://twitter.com/davidhogg111/status/1518726536437764096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
“Star Wars” actor Mark Hamill retweeted Tanden’s tweet, adding: “I just lost more than 8,000 followers in the last couple of hours. Was it something I said?&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Weird. I just lost more than 8,000 followers in the last couple of hours. Was it something I said? <a href="https://t.co/TS3vwDephc">https://t.co/TS3vwDephc</a>
&mdash; Mark Hamill (@MarkHamill) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarkHamill/status/1518724468406767616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Another Twitter user, Christopher Bouzy, wrote: &#8220;Exclusive: Over the past 24 hours, Democrats have experienced a significant decrease in followers, while Republicans have experienced a significant increase in followers&#8230;&#8221; He posted a chart not on liberals but only former President Barack Obama, which showed he lost roughly 5,000 of his 131 million followers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
🤖Exclusive: Over the past 24 hours, Democrats have experienced a significant decrease in followers, while Republicans have experienced a significant increase in followers&#8230; <a href="https://t.co/jOg0or4bKS">pic.twitter.com/jOg0or4bKS</a>
&mdash; Christopher Bouzy (@cbouzy) <a href="https://twitter.com/cbouzy/status/1518953731961802752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
“I’m down about the same (proportionately) &#8211; around 1800. Can’t tell if it’s dead bots or people afraid that Elon will find out they were following me,” former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann tweeted.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
I&#39;m down about the same (proportionately) &#8211; around 1800. Can&#39;t tell if it&#39;s dead bots or people afraid that Elon will find out they were following me
&mdash; Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1518726296494292995?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The social media site is overrun with bots. Way back in 2017, CNBC <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/10/nearly-48-million-twitter-accounts-could-be-bots-says-study.html">reported</a> that &#8220;as many as 48 million Twitter accounts aren’t people.&#8221; But Musk plans to change that. Last week, he tweeted: &#8220;If our twitter bid succeeds, we will defeat the spam bots or die trying!&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
If our twitter bid succeeds, we will defeat the spam bots or die trying!
&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1517215066550116354?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 21, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Conservatives are well aware of how Twitter limits their accounts. The social media giant can “shadow-ban” accounts, which means their posts don&#8217;t even appear on their followers newsfeeds. Plus, Twitter can simply purge an account&#8217;s followers and censor any content they choose by labeling it &#8220;hate speech” or “harassment.”
Other Twitter users claimed liberals&#8217; plunging numbers were simply people shutting down accounts over Musk&#8217;s acquisition.
&#8220;Its [sic] people leaving because of Elon most likely,&#8221; one user <a href="https://twitter.com/shouxing3/status/1518810447419363329">wrote</a>.
Others speculated that Twitter was purging bots as part of the sale.
&#8220;Its [sic] a bot purge. They have to do some due diligence for the sale. I bet having millions of fake accounts will be a problem so they are deleting,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/FPWellman/status/1518742818822496259">wrote</a> one user.
&#8220;However, largely missing from the list of users complaining about a loss of Twitter followers were conservative and right-wing accounts. In fact, a number of users in this group actually gained followers in the last 24 hours,&#8221; Fortune magazine <a href="https://fortune.com/2022/04/26/twitter-accounts-left-losing-followers-right-gaining-musk-buyout-sealed/">reported</a>. &#8220;While users like Michelle Obama, Bernie Sanders, and Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez all lost more than 10,000 followers overnight, according to data from social media analytics tracker SocialBlade, conservatives like Ted Cruz, Newt Gingrich, and Laura Ingraham all gained.&#8221;
Joseph Curl has covered politics for 35 years, including 12 years as White House correspondent for a national newspaper. He was also the a.m. editor of the Drudge Report for four years. Send tips to josephcurl@dailywire.com and follow him on Twitter @josephcurl.

Mark Hamill is Honored with Star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame

Liberals Bemoan Lost Twitter Followers After Musk Takeover

Celebrities

Elon Musk

Mark Hamill

Neera Tanden

Twitter

Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is taking action against two of her critics who have accused her of &#8220;treasonous&#8221; activities and other potentially defamatory comments regarding Russia and the war in Ukraine, demanding that the offending parties preserve evidence and stop making such claims or face potential litigation.
Gabbard, a U.S. war veteran and former presidential Democratic primary candidate, announced on Wednesday afternoon that she and her attorney, Harmeet K. Dhillon, have sent Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) and liberal pundit Keith Olbermann cease and desist letters due to tweets posted by the two individuals that potentially damage her reputation with what she says are baseless claims.
&#8220;When powerful, influential people make baseless accusations of treason, a crime punishable by death, in order to intimidate, silence and censor those who speak the truth, it has a chilling effect on our democracy,&#8221; Gabbard tweeted. &#8220;This cannot go unchecked.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
When powerful, influential people make baseless accusations of treason, a crime punishable by death, in order to intimidate, silence and censor those who speak the truth, it has a chilling effect on our democracy.  This cannot go unchecked. <a href="https://t.co/evoefpc0Yd">https://t.co/evoefpc0Yd</a>
&mdash; Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) <a href="https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1516857719478620160?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 20, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
On March 13, Romney tweeted: &#8220;Tulsi Gabbard is parroting false Russian propaganda. Her treasonous lies may well cost lives.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Tulsi Gabbard is parroting false Russian propaganda. Her treasonous lies may well cost lives.
&mdash; Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) <a href="https://twitter.com/MittRomney/status/1503113473819041796?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 13, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
In the<a href="https://www.dhillonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/20220420_CDletter_Gabbard_Romney_Final.pdf"> letter sent by Dhillon</a>, Romney was advised, &#8220;Your accusation that Representative Gabbard, a combat veteran and current military officer, has engaged in &#8216;treasonous&#8217; activity is completely false, a fact of which you were well aware when you made your claim. And as explained below, your accusation that Representative Gabbard lied also has no basis in fact.&#8221;
&#8220;Your allegation that Representative Gabbard spoke &#8216;treasonous lies&#8217; is clear-cut defamation,&#8221; Dhillon added. Romney&#8217;s tweet appears to be in response to a video Gabbard released that discussed U.S.-funded biological laboratories in Ukraine.
To that extent, Dhillon added that his accusation claiming Gabbard told lies is &#8220;false.&#8221;
&#8220;In her video, Representative Gabbard made the factual claim that there were American-funded biological laboratories in Ukraine,&#8221; Dhillon said. &#8220;The existence of biological laboratories in Ukraine is beyond dispute,&#8221; she added before providing evidence for such a claim.
Dhillon&#8217;s <a href="https://www.dhillonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/20220420_CDletter_Gabbard_Olbermann_Final.pdf">letter to Olbermann</a> noted that on March 14, &#8220;the Twitter account @LibWatchDog posted a video in which hosts of the View made outlandish statements suggesting that the Department of Justice should investigate Representative Gabbard, along with Fox News Host Tucker Carlson.&#8221;
Olbermann responded to that tweet, saying &#8220;They are Russian Assets and there is a war. There’s a case for detaining them militarily. Trials are a sign of good faith and patience on the part of democracy.&#8221;
Dhillon informed the former MSNBC host that he &#8220;acted with actual malice when you defamed Representative Gabbard.&#8221;
&#8220;Representative Gabbard’s loyalty to the United States is beyond reproach, and you either knew your description of her as a &#8216;Russian Asset&#8217; was false when you made it, or you acted in reckless disregard as to her allegiance to the United States,&#8221; she added.
Dhillon also told Olbermann that while Gabbard &#8220;believes that free speech is a cornerstone of American democracy, your accusation that she is a &#8216;Russian Asset&#8217; is far outside of the bounds of free speech and civility. It is defamation.&#8221;
According to Gabbard&#8217;s legal representative, the former congresswoman would prefer to settle this dispute out of court. Both Olbermann and Romney have until April 27 to respond to the cease and desist letters. Dhillon also noted that Gabbard &#8220;will likely be forced to pursue litigation concerning this matter,&#8221; and that the two should preserve all evidence as it relates to the tweets in question as the law requires.

US-VOTE-2020-DEMOCRATS-DEBATE

‘This Cannot Go Unchecked’: Tulsi Gabbard Hits Mitt Romney, Keith Olbermann With Cease And Desist Letters Over ‘Defamatory’ Comments

Defamation

Mitt Romney

Russia

Tulsi Gabbard

Ukraine

CNN host Chris Cuomo is in boiling hot water over his brother, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
The Democratic governor sexually harassed at least 11 women and then retaliated against at least one former employee who complained, according to a report released Tuesday by state Attorney General Letitia James. The report concluded that the governor &#8220;sexually harassed multiple women and in doing so violated federal and state law,” James said at a press conference.
James&#8217; report also said that CNN’s Cuomo received “confidential and often privileged information” about some of the women who alleged sexual harassment and “looked to protect” his brother. In addition, the report said the TV host “found ways not to believe” his brother&#8217;s accusers.
&#8220;This is an intolerable conflict of interest for @CNN,&#8221; said Keith Olbermann, a sports and political commentator who hosted an MSNBC show from 2003 to 2011. &#8220;You cannot have an anchor formally consulting his brother on how to handle the media, when he has outsized influence on how a large player in the media covers his brother (or doesn’t). They cannot keep @ChrisCuomo on air.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
This is an intolerable conflict of interest for <a href="https://twitter.com/CNN?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@cnn</a>. You cannot have an anchor formally consulting his brother on how to handle the media, when he has outsized influence on how a large player in the media covers his brother (or doesn’t). They cannot keep <a href="https://twitter.com/ChrisCuomo?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ChrisCuomo</a> on air. <a href="https://t.co/pFEuMstrnt">https://t.co/pFEuMstrnt</a>
&mdash; Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1422606358650757128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 3, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
James&#8217; report also divulged a text message from one of the governor’s alleged victims complaining about CNN’s pro-Cuomo coverage. In May, The Washington Post broke the news that the host of “Cuomo Prime Time” advised his older brother how to handle the burgeoning cases of sexual impropriety. At the time, the network said his behavior was inappropriate but would not happen again, The Daily Wire&#8217;s Ben Johnson <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/cnn-plunged-into-conflict-of-interest-over-cuomo-sexual-harassment-probe">reported</a>.
Chris Cuomo and many others who devised the governor’s crisis response strategy “were not State employees at all,” the AG report says.  “None of them was officially retained in any capacity by the Executive Chamber or any of the individuals involved.”
“Nonetheless, they were regularly provided with confidential and often privileged information about state operations and helped make decisions that impacted State business and employees — all without any formal role, duty, or obligation to the State,” the report says.
The report says the governor “actively engaged in an effort to discredit her, including by disseminating to the press confidential internal documents that painted her in a negative light.” But the governor’s “advisors, including [Global Strategy Group founder Jeffrey] Pollock and Chris Cuomo, counseled him to express contrition after the press published Ms. [Charlotte] Bennett’s allegations,” at least in public, the report says.
In May, Chris Cuomo said on his show &#8220;Cuomo Prime Time,&#8221; &#8220;I love my family and I love my job. My family means everything to me and I am fiercely loyal to them. I am family first, job second. But being a journalist and a brother to a politician is unique, and a unique challenge and I have a unique responsibility to balance those roles.&#8221;
&#8220;Cuomo at the time apologized after The Washington Post reported that he had taken part in conversations with Andrew Cuomo about the allegations being made against him—and how to respond,&#8221; Forbes reported.
“When my brother’s situation became turbulent, being looped into calls with other friends of his, advisers, that did include some of his staff, I understand why that was a problem for CNN,” Cuomo said, according to Forbes. “It will not happen again. It was a mistake, because I put my colleagues, who I consider the best in the business, in a bad spot.&#8221;

Annual Charity Day Hosted By Cantor Fitzgerald, BGC and GFI – Cantor Fitzgerald Office – Inside

Keith Olbermann: CNN ‘Cannot Keep Chris Cuomo On Air’

Andrew Cuomo

Former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann blocked Rose McGowan on Twitter and cursed at her after she posted a video explaining why she went on Fox News to warn against the cult-like aspects of politics, which she said are &#8220;most especially&#8221; found among Democrats.
&#8220;If you can’t tell the difference between the Republican Death Cult and the Democrats, let me summarize for you: you’re full of sh*t. And blocked,&#8221; Olbermann tweeted.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
If you can’t tell the difference between the Republican Death Cult and the Democrats, let me summarize for you: you’re full of shit. And blocked.
&mdash; Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1386929276218482688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 27, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
During a Monday <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-rose-mcgowan-warns-against-being-controlled-by-politics-says-democrats-most-especially-in-a-deep-cult?utm_source=facebook&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=benshapiro&amp;fbclid=IwAR1IuVVx4kWiZ47j_f550wfX86IbaXpDXCM3jEHTLhQlAuDsW4vNxBU4_iM" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">interview</a> with Fox News host Tammy Bruce, McGowan drew on her experience of growing up in The Children of God cult to explain the cult-like thinking she discerns on both sides of the political divide in the U.S., but &#8220;most especially&#8221; among Democrats.
“I am not here to make people feel bad about their political choices,” she said. “But I am here to say that you might be in a cult too if you don’t know the signs. And I do believe Democrats, most especially, are in a deep cult that they really don’t know about and aren’t really aware of.”
In the video to which Olbermann was responding, McGowan had said in response to anticipated criticism, &#8220;I did an interview on Fox News that it causes such a cognitive dissonance as someone who was, you know, at least basically from when I set foot in America, a Democrat, because that’s what my mother was, never questioned that Fox is the enemy. And tonight they’ll run with, you know, Rose McGowan says Democrats are in a cult, but I also said Republicans were, too.&#8221;
“If you lean deep into anything and refuse to hear anything else, and you’re serving a master that there’s no evidence is serving you, then maybe you’re in a cult,” she added. “And that was my message.”
McGowan&#8217;s warning echoed Fox News host Tucker Carlson&#8217;s recent observation that increasingly more Americans are replacing religion with politics, a trend he said is &#8220;driving everyone crazy.&#8221; As The Daily Wire <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/theyre-enslaved-tucker-carlson-warns-against-americans-increasingly-replacing-religion-with-politics" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported</a>:
<blockquote>Speaking with Fox News hosts Bill Hemmer and Dana Perino about the recent Gallup poll noting that U.S. church membership has <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/u-s-church-membership-dips-below-50-for-first-time-poll" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">declined below 50 percent</a>, Carlson <a href="https://video.foxnews.com/v/6246251901001?playlist_id=903354961001#sp=show-clips">noted</a> such a trend has “never happened, so far as I know.”
“This is the result of a long-term trend,” he said. “This is the result of a liberation movement, a liberation movement that sought to liberate Americans from the constraints of traditional religion. And like all liberation movements in this country, at a certain point it becomes the opposite of what it purports to be.”
“Are people really more liberated than they were when they believed in God?” Carlson asked. “Are they less anxious? Look, everyone dies in the end. And if you don’t acknowledge that or provide an explanation for what happens after you die, then people are filled with existential dread, with anxiety. And maybe drug abuse skyrockets, and so do suicides and hopelessness, and all the conventional signs of despair like the ones we’re seeing now.”
“And so, actually, people aren’t liberated by fleeing from meaning, from God, from religion,” Carlson concluded. “They’re enslaved. Look at the country!”</blockquote>
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/u-s-church-membership-dips-below-50-for-first-time-poll" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">U.S. Church Membership Dips Below 50% For First Time: Poll</a>

Rose McGowan and Keith Olbermann

Keith Olbermann Blocks, Curses At Rose McGowan For Claiming Democrats In ‘Deep Cult’

Democratic Party

Rose McGowan

Leftist Keith Olbermann ranted in a new YouTube video on Thursday that those who support President Donald Trump, including federal judge and Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, &#8220;must be prosecuted and convicted and removed from our society.&#8221;
&#8220;Trump can be and must be expunged. The hate he has triggered, the pandora’s box he has opened, they will not be so easily destroyed. So, let us brace ourselves. The task is twofold,&#8221; Olbermann said. &#8220;The terrorist Trump must be defeated, must be destroyed, must be devoured at the ballot box and then he and his enablers and his supporters and his collaborators and the Mike Lees and the William Barrs and the Sean Hannitys and the Mike Pences and the Rudy Giulianis and the Kyle Rittenhouses and the Amy Coney Barretts must be prosecuted and convicted and removed from our society while we try and rebuild it and to rebuild the world Trump has nearly destroyed by turning it over to a virus.&#8221;
&#8220;Remember it. Even as we dream of a return to reality and safety and the country for which our forefathers died that the fight is not just to win an election, but to win it by enough to chase at least for a moment Trump and the maggots off the stage,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;And then try to clean off what they left. Remember it. Even though to remember it means that the fight does not end November 3. But in many ways will only begin that day.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Remove ACB fr society. <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlberman?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KeithOlberman</a> in YouTube rant: “Trump can be and must be expunged&#8230;.His enablers&#8230;the Mike Lee’s, the William Barr’s and the Sean Hannity’s and the Mike Pence’s&#8230;and the Amy Coney Barrett’s must be prosecuted and convicted and removed from our society” <a href="https://t.co/jC0AgOhAMU">pic.twitter.com/jC0AgOhAMU</a>
&mdash; Brent Baker (@BrentHBaker) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrentHBaker/status/1314650158978736128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Newsbusters <a href="https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2020/10/09/still-nuts-olbermann-wants-remove-handmaid-barrett-society">highlighted</a> separate remarks that Olbermann made in a video posted on Wednesday where he &#8220;repeated a lie about Barrett.&#8221;
&#8220;A note about the Handmaid Supreme Court Justice. Amy Coney Barrett was not just in the fundamentalist sect that The Handmaid’s Tale was based loosely. She was in fact, her title was, in fact, handmaid, we are told,&#8221; Olbermann said. &#8220;She should resign and she should withdraw, but she won’t. Roe v. Wade will have to be protected by new laws or the number of judges on the court changed.&#8221;
Newsbusters added, &#8220;Apparently the secular Olbermann isn’t aware that the term &#8216;handmaid&#8217; actually predates the HBO show and is used in the Bible. Also, Olbermann is lying. Even Handmaid creator Margaret Atwood said the show is not based on the group Barrett was in.&#8221;
Olbermann’s comments about Barrett come just days before her Senate Judiciary Committee hearings begin. Barrett was nominated by Trump — his third Supreme Court pick — to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg following her death after a fifth bout with cancer.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said in a tweet this week: &#8220;Judge Barrett’s hearings will begin one week from today. Chairman Graham has all the tools to conduct a hybrid hearing, just like the 150 others the Senate has held this year. We will not stop working for the American people because Democrats are afraid they may lose a vote.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Judge Barrett’s hearings will begin one week from today. Chairman Graham has all the tools to conduct a hybrid hearing, just like the 150 others the Senate has held this year.   We will not stop working for the American people because Democrats are afraid they may lose a vote.
&mdash; Leader McConnell (@senatemajldr) <a href="https://twitter.com/senatemajldr/status/1313275429894135808?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 6, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Keith Olbermann: ‘The Amy Coney Barretts Must Be Prosecuted And Convicted And Removed From Our Society’

2020 Election

Amy Coney Barrett

Anti-Trump #Resistance hero Keith Olbermann received a talking to from ESPN, his employer, after demanding Mississippi Clarion-Ledger journalist Brian Broom be fired and encouraging an Internet mob to harass a 22-year-old hunter Broom wrote about for the outlet.
Olbermann posted Broom&#8217;s Clarion Ledger piece <a href="https://www.clarionledger.com/story/sports/outdoors/2019/03/25/turkey-hunter-bags-bizarre-white-turkey-mississippi/3210749002/'">chronicling</a> Hunter Waltman&#8217;s kill of a rare white turkey to Twitter on Tuesday. And in typical unhinged fashion, the former MSNBC personality urged social media users to make Waltman&#8217;s life &#8220;a living hell.&#8221;
&#8220;It be rare and beautiful so me should kill it,&#8221; mocked the 60-year-old. &#8220;This pea-brained scumbag identifies himself as Hunter Waltman and we should do our best to make sure the rest of his life is a living hell.&#8221;
The politico added, &#8220;And the nitwit clown who wrote this fawning piece should be fired.&#8221;
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
It be rare and beautiful so me should kill it.
This pea-brained scumbag identifies himself as Hunter Waltman and we should do our best to make sure the rest of his life is a living hell. And the nitwit clown who wrote this fawning piece should be fired. <a href="https://t.co/KdU3Bkg104">https://t.co/KdU3Bkg104</a>
&#8212; Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) <a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1110543221485125632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
</div>
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/great-outdoors/mississippi-newspaper-hits-back-after-keith-olbermann-calls-for-writer-to-be-fired-over-turkey-hunting-article">According</a> to Fox News, ESPN &#8220;confirmed that it has &#8216;spoken to&#8217;&#8221; Olberman over his controversial comments concerning the young hunter and Broom.
&#8220;We have spoken to him about not making personal attacks,&#8221; an ESPN representative said in a statement.
As Broom noted in his feature on Waltman, the hunter received mild criticism online, mostly because some argued that the turkey he killed was not wild, but domestic livestock. The hunter maintained that the rare bird was &#8220;100 percent wild,&#8221; and certified wildlife biologist Bob Eriksen agreed.
&#8220;The naked head and neck do not appear to be as ornate as one would expect in a domestic turkey gobbler,&#8221; Eriksen, a Natural Resources Conservation Service technical service provider, informed Broom. &#8220;Even in a first-generation cross between an eastern wild turkey and a domestic bird there would be evidence of domestic traits such as a very large, ornate head and neck and an excessively large dewlap. In addition a F1 would exhibit short lower legs that would be heavier than those of a wild eastern.&#8221;
The Clarion-Ledger&#8217;s Executive Editor Sam R. Hall took a swing at Olbermann for his ignorance of hunting culture and his outrageous call for Broom to be fired for doing his job.
&#8220;Keith Olbermann says Brian Broom should be fired for writing this story. What was I thinking? I guess I should have fired our outdoors writer for writing about a hunter killing an unusual turkey during turkey hunting season,&#8221; teased Hall.
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KeithOlbermann</a> says <a href="https://twitter.com/BrianBroom?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BrianBroom</a> should be fired for writing this story. What was I thinking? I guess I should have fired our outdoors writer for writing about a hunter killing an unusual turkey during turkey hunting season. <a href="https://t.co/3lhrtlwlQO">https://t.co/3lhrtlwlQO</a>
&#8212; Sam R. Hall (@samrhall) <a href="https://twitter.com/samrhall/status/1110582350763778049?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
</div>
The executive editor added that Olbermann&#8217;s comments were &#8220;recklessly irresponsible.&#8221;
&#8220;Someone with his following needs to understand the possible impact of his words,&#8221; Hall noted. &#8221;Telling over 1 million people to make someone&#8217;s life a living hell could have seriously dangerous consequences. In our newsroom, that would be a fireable offense, not writing a story about a hunter bagging a turkey.&#8221;
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
In our newsroom, that would be a fireable offense, not writing a story about a hunter bagging a turkey.
&#8212; Sam R. Hall (@samrhall) <a href="https://twitter.com/samrhall/status/1110909348992176132?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2019</a></blockquote>
</div>
In November 2017, Olbermann, one of the loudest voices in the #Resistance movement, announced the end of his YouTube show &#8220;The Resistance&#8221; for GQ magazine. During his goodbye, Olbermann assured the public that President Donald Trump&#8217;s presidency would soon come to an end.
&#8220;I am confident now, even more so than I have been over the last year that this nightmare presidency of Donald John Trump will end prematurely and end soon, and I am thus also confident that this is the correct moment to end this series of commentaries,&#8221; he said at the time, <a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/11/28/olbermann_retires_from_commentary_trump_presidency_will_end_soon.html">according</a> to Real Clear Politics. &#8220;This ballgame is also over and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to last another 13 months. And so this series is over.&#8221;
In the words of President Trump, things are looking pretty &#8220;Sad!&#8221; for Olbermann all around.

ESPN Reprimands Keith Olbermann After He Sics Mob On 22-Year-Old Hunter: Make His Life ‘A Living Hell’

ESPN

On Tuesday, just hours after Roseanne Barr apologized for her tweet describing former Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett as the love child of the Muslim Brotherhood and &#8220;Planet of the Apes,&#8221; ABC announced that it was canceling &#8220;Roseanne&#8221; over the star&#8217;s &#8220;abhorrent&#8221; and &#8220;repugnant&#8221; statement. (Barr has since <a href="https://metro.co.uk/2018/05/30/roseanne-barr-now-suggests-wasnt-aware-valerie-jarrett-black-compared-ape-7589934/">suggested</a> that she didn&#8217;t realize Jarrett is part-black and blamed &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/31218/here-are-now-deleted-tweets-roseanne-barr-post-amanda-prestigiacomo">Ambien tweeting</a>&#8221; for her bad judgment.)
The abrupt cancelation of the hit reboot of the show was met with applause from many, particularly her fellow <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/31211/hollywood-stars-celebrate-cancellation-roseanne-amanda-prestigiacomo">celebrities</a> who find Barr&#8217;s pro-Trumpism unbearable, but it was also met from the right by many who pointed out the double standard of the media, particularly ABC.
In a tweet noted by <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/media/389858-conservatives-sees-double-standard-on-roseanne-cite-olbermann-joy-reid">The Hill,</a> political comedian <a href="http://GOP Congressman Refuses to Seek Re-election to Treat Alcoholism Bradley Devlin On Monday, Congressman Tom Garrett (R-VA) announced he would not seek reelection for a second term in Congress due to his ongoing battle with alcoholism. After a week of chaos in his office, rumors began flying about his departure from Washington DC. Garrett&#8217;s chief of staff, Jimmy Keady, resigned amidst a damaging story in Politico about Garrett&#8217;s treatment of staffers. The Politico story accused Congressman Garrett of treating some of his staffers as servants. Four anonymous sources claimed that Garrett made them perform personal, not professional, tasks in the workplace. The staffers were forced to act as the Garrett family&#8217;s personal chauffeurs and maids. One ex-aide even said they were put in charge of cleaning the family dog&#8217;s doo-doo off the carpet. According to Politico, Garrett had begun telling associates he would not seek re-election, but then changed his tune Wednesday in a 30-minute news conference. &#8220;There is no way in heck that I&#8217;m not going to be back here in 2019 as a member of the Congress representing the 5th District of Virginia,&#8221; said Garret. &#8220;Too darn much is at stake.&#8221; After more contemplation, the 46-year-old member of the Freedom Caucus released a recorded statement announcing once and for all that he would not be running for reelection. 	 &#8220;Any person &#8212; Republican, Democrat or independent &#8212; who has known me for any period of time and has any integrity knows two things: I am a good man and I&#8217;m an alcoholic,&#8221; Garrett said, fighting back tears. &#8220;This is the hardest statement that I have ever publicly made by far. It&#8217;s also the truth.&#8221; The 5th Congressional District Republican Committee now must scramble to find another candidate. Names being tossed around by those close to the VA GOP say Sen. Jill Holtzman Vogel (Fauquier), state Sen. William M. Stanley Jr. (Franklin), Sen. Bryce E. Reeves (Spotsylvania) and Del. Robert B. Bell (Albemarle), among others, could step forward. This is just the latest in a string of 48 Republican retirements before the 2018 midterm elections, and many working for the majority on the hill continue to worry about their job security come January.">Tim Young</a> was among those who highlighted the egregious double standard of the networks. If Barr should be fired for her tweet &#8212; like many on the right, including Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Sean Hannity, say was the right move &#8212; then what about the tweets of a man Disney/ABC-owned ESPN just rehired: Keith Olbermann, whose record on Twitter could also be described as &#8220;abhorrent&#8221; and &#8220;repugnant&#8221;:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
The last thing ABC stands for is supporting someone who tweets awful things&#8230; Now over to Keith Olbermann with sports&#8230; <a href="https://t.co/bEXprawPtJ">pic.twitter.com/bEXprawPtJ</a>
&#8212; Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) <a href="https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1001536913185148929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
I have no problems with Roseanne losing her show because of her racist tweeting&#8230;
My issue is the treatment of left leaning entertainers who do similar or worse and get a pass.
&#8212; Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) <a href="https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1001594098413957120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Things the First Amendment doesn&#8217;t apply to: 
Your boss at a tv network (or any job) firing you for your tweets. 
The NFL penalizing you for taking a knee during the national anthem.
&#8212; Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) <a href="https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1001596475065929728?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
President Trump issued a similar &#8220;double standard&#8221; complaint in his <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/31253/trump-responds-abcs-handling-roseanne-tweet-james-barrett">response</a> to ABC&#8217;s handling of Roseanne&#8217;s inflammatory tweet. Rather than addressing the content of Barr&#8217;s post, Trump slammed Disney CEO Bob Iger for failing to reach out to him like he did to Jarrett.
&#8220;Bob Iger of ABC called Valerie Jarrett to let her know that &#8216;ABC does not tolerate comments like those&#8217; made by Roseanne Barr,&#8221; wrote Trump. &#8220;Gee, he never called President Donald J. Trump to apologize for the HORRIBLE statements made and said about me on ABC. Maybe I just didn&#8217;t get the call?&#8221;
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Bob Iger of ABC called Valerie Jarrett to let her know that &#8220;ABC does not tolerate comments like those&#8221; made by Roseanne Barr. Gee, he never called President Donald J. Trump to apologize for the HORRIBLE statements made and said about me on ABC. Maybe I just didn&#8217;t get the call?
&#8212; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1001848460881035265?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders expanded on Trump&#8217;s complaint in a press briefing Wednesday, specifically citing ESPN&#8217;s decision to hire Olbermann. &#8220;Where was Bob Iger&#8217;s apology to the White House staff for Jemele Hill calling the president and anyone associated had him a white supremacist?&#8221; she <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/31278/watch-sarah-sanders-gives-strong-response-nbc-jacob-airey">said</a>. &#8220;To Christians around the world for Joy Behar calling Christianity a mental illness? Where was the apology for Kathy Griffin going on a profane rant against the President on &#8216;The View&#8217; after a photo showed her holding president Trump&#8217;s decapitated head?&#8230;Where was the apology for Bob Iger hiring for ESPN Keith Olbermann after his numerous expletive-laced tweets saying the president is a Nazi and even expanding Olbermann&#8217;s role after that attack against the President&#8217;s family.&#8221;
The other media figure who has been cited most frequently as an example of the media&#8217;s double standard is Joy Reid, who has recently come under fire for <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/29908/uh-oh-post-joy-reid-trump-might-finally-turn-left-james-barrett">past blog posts</a> which have been decried from all side as &#8220;homophobic&#8221; and &#8220;transphobic,&#8221; yet continues to be employed by MSNBC despite having failed to fully take responsibility, claiming initially that she was hacked &#8212; a claim <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/29958/daily-beast-suspends-joy-reids-column-then-james-barrett">the Daily Beast debunked</a>.
In fact, in a particularly jaw-dropping moment, on Tuesday, MSNBC&#8217;s Andrea Mitchell invited on Reid to talk about Roseanne&#8217;s tweet, with Mitchell at one point even asking Reid, without a hint of irony, &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/31210/watch-msnbc-asks-joy-reid-about-rosanne-firing-ryan-saavedra">What do you have to do on social media to get fired from a top-rated show on an American broadcast network?</a>&#8220;
Related: 
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/31108/msnbc-footballs-olbermann-gets-new-contract-espn-ben-shapiro">SHAPIRO: MSNBC WITH FOOTBALLS: Olbermann Gets New Contract With ESPN</a>
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/31223/valerie-jarrett-blames-trump-roseanne-barrs-racist-joseph-curl">Valerie Jarrett Blames Trump For Roseanne Barr&#8217;s &#8216;Racist&#8217; Tweet</a>
This article has been updated to include the responses of President Trump and Sarah Sanders.

Comedian: Hey, Roseanne-Firing ABC, Remember These Awful Tweets By Your New Employee Keith Olbermann?

Roseanne Barr

Valerie Jarrett

On Friday, ESPN announced that it had signed a new contract with Keith Olbermann that will give the far-Left former MSNBC, Current TV, and GQ host an expanded role with the flailing network. According to USA Today, Olbermann will now anchor Sportscenter some 20 times per year. Olbermann, who has now finally reached the pinnacle of his career &#8211; right back where he started, with the same role &#8211; put on a happy face: &#8220;Since we started this, my sixth separate tenure with ESPN, in January, I&#8217;ve found the variety of assignments to be the most fun and energizing of all my stints. Adding stuff, like being a rookie 59-year-old play-by-play guy, plus the Rip Van Winkle of Sportscenter, only adds to the smorgasbord. Can&#8217;t wait, and at my age, I shouldn&#8217;t.&#8221;
This is just the latest indicator that ESPN&#8217;s leftward-leaning politics will continue for the foreseeable future. Over the past decade, ESPN has morphed from a network focused largely on highlights and analysis into a political debate channel &#8211; MSNBC with footballs. Conservatives have been all-but-excised, while leftists have been granted an ever-increasing presence. How many ESPN anchors, for example, actually believe that NFL players shouldn&#8217;t be kneeling for the national anthem? And how many expressed that opinion &#8211; shared by a vast majority of Americans &#8211; on the air? See, for example, ESPN&#8217;s <a href="https://sports.yahoo.com/fox-s-jemele-hill-191753602.html">Jemele Hill</a>, who was briefly suspended by the network for calling President Trump a &#8220;white supremacist&#8221; and who suggested boycotting the NFL, had a lucrative stint on the Sportscenter 6 p.m. show; she&#8217;ll be moving to their site, The Undefeated, which focuses &#8220;on the intersection of race and sports.&#8221; Surely, that will be a traffic magnet. Or the network&#8217;s focus on gun control after the Parkland massacre &#8211; on a sports network.
ESPN&#8217;s coverage hasn&#8217;t just skewed politically &#8211; it&#8217;s skewed in terms of the sports covered. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/15817/espn-morphs-msnbc-footballs-fires-reporters-keeps-ben-shapiro">As I wrote a year ago</a>:
<blockquote>
ESPN sees the growing base of the network as more heavily minority and therefore leftist. ESPN has focused heavily on the NBA in recent years &#8211; a sport with a massively growing black and Latino fan base, <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2015/hoop-dreams-multicultural-diversity-in-nba-viewership.html">according to Nielsen</a> &#8212; at the expense of sports like hockey, with its overwhelmingly white fan base. For example, in 2012, Sportcenter spent 23.3 percent of its time on the NFL, 19.2 percent of its time on the NBA, 16.8 percent of its time on baseball, and just 2.7 percent of its time on the NHL and 2.1 percent on NASCAR, according to <a href="https://deadspin.com/what-i-learned-from-a-year-of-watching-sportscenter-5979510">Deadspin</a>. Note the skew toward the NBA here. According to a <a href="http://www.theharrispoll.com/sports/Americas_Fav_Sport_2016.html">2015 Harris poll</a>, here are the most popular sports in America: football (33 percent), baseball (15 percent), college football (10 percent), NASCAR (6 percent), hockey (5 percent) and the NBA (five percent). In other words, ESPN is clearly making a decision based not on broad appeal of particular sports &#8211; they&#8217;re no longer broadcasting, they&#8217;re narrowcasting, focusing on squeezing additional minutes out of what they perceive to be their core audience. This creates a self-fulfilling feedback loop that promotes leftist politics: get good ratings with heavier minority viewers, pander to them with leftist politics, drive away the other viewers, and then double down on what remains. There&#8217;s a reason ESPN treated Colin Kaepernick as a hero while the rest of the country saw him as a nincompoop.
</blockquote>
So welcome back, Olbermann. It&#8217;s like you never left MSNBC. They just added some occasional crosstalk about golf.

MSNBC WITH FOOTBALLS: Olbermann Gets New Contract With ESPN

Donald Trump Jr. has been having a grand old time on Twitter this week, smacking the new official arch enemy of the Trump administration, debunking Fake News about his father, exposing the Failing New York Times for pro-Clinton bias, crushing the &#8220;clickbait rag&#8221; that is Newsweek, while taking retweeting to a new level.
Don Jr. kicked things off on New Year&#8217;s Day by slamming The New York Times for its obvious &#8220;double standard&#8221; by linking to a story (which happens to be by The Daily Wire) on WikiLeaks calling out the Times for its own &#8220;collusion.&#8221; He added another tweet penned by actor James Woods knocking the Times for its overt bias a few days later:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
The double standard never ends. Every day <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a>&#8217;s win is that much more impressive when you realize all he was actually up against. WikiLeaks Drops Proof That NYTimes Colluded With Hillary Clinton | Daily Wire <a href="https://t.co/acbdDbmH3e">https://t.co/acbdDbmH3e</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/947945772871536640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 1, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Only the <a href="https://twitter.com/nytimes?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nytimes</a> could publish this story without mentioning that a) Abedin emailed a classified password, b) her husband is in prison, and c) she broke federal espionage laws. <a href="https://t.co/zlFR0ZG0MZ">https://t.co/zlFR0ZG0MZ</a>
&#8212; James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/948454213994106882?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
He also smacked the &#8220;@Onion&#8221;-esque Newsweek:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Watching Newsweek turn into a clickbait rag is pretty sad. Most of their headlines look like the were taken from <a href="https://twitter.com/OnionPolitics?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@OnionPolitics</a>. Truly laughable. <a href="https://t.co/VZFWnqaazm">https://t.co/VZFWnqaazm</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948750054436859904?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
He welcomed &#8220;American leadership&#8221; back to the White House with several tweets contrasting his father&#8217;s handling of our enemies with Obama&#8217;s, among them:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Welcome back, American leadership. It was a long eight years. <a href="https://t.co/NkPRSgQIm9">https://t.co/NkPRSgQIm9</a>
&#8212; Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) <a href="https://twitter.com/ArthurSchwartz/status/948555974159273985?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
After Trump&#8217;s button tweet, North Korea has agreed to open a border hotline with South Korea to discuss dialogue between the two
Obama never accomplished this.
Trump did it with one tweet.
&#8212; Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) <a href="https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/948415242584907777?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Weird, I wonder what prompted that??? <a href="https://t.co/3NzvC5eFDO">https://t.co/3NzvC5eFDO</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948608679636500480?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
He threw in a defense of his father&#8217;s tweeting habits for good measure:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
People who want Trump to stop tweeting: 
1) Iranian regime terrorists 
2) Kim Jong Un 
3) DC Swamp Creatures 
4) Anti-Trump Big-Govt Libs 
5) Media Hacks 
6) Nearly every former Obama admin official 
7) Hillary Clinton 
8) Jim Comey 
9) Huma Abedin<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TheCompanyYouKeep?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TheCompanyYouKeep</a>
&#8212; Dan Bongino (@dbongino) <a href="https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/948353626791120896?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
He took a moment to offer his opinion on Keith Olbermann:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Life is hard; it&#8217;s even harder when you&#8217;re stupid. <a href="https://t.co/rpS7svtfvf">pic.twitter.com/rpS7svtfvf</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/924693159220862976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>
He also called out some obvious falsehoods in the new Michael Wolff book about the Trump White House that&#8217;s been causing a stir:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
More lies, go back and look, Boehner and <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/potus?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#potus</a> spent time together well before the election. Just another pathetic attempt to smear <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/fakenews?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#fakenews</a> <a href="https://t.co/xxuhdiQU8f">https://t.co/xxuhdiQU8f</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948609778951098368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Another good one. Anyone who knows me or follows me knows that&#8217;s about as far from something I would say or how I speak as possible&#8230; What a joke. <a href="https://t.co/4L9rYK8W56">https://t.co/4L9rYK8W56</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948689273905131525?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
Of all the topics he addressed over the last few days, Don Jr. had the most to say about former White House chief strategist-turned-administration whipping boy, Steve Bannon. He started by thanking him for losing Alabama for the Republicans and then really started unloading on the former White House strategist:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Thanks Steve. Keep up the great work. <a href="https://t.co/J9O8CUfJAD">https://t.co/J9O8CUfJAD</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948625872914931712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Minus the foul language The Mooch pretty much nailed it. <a href="https://t.co/lVLP3p4XPT">https://t.co/lVLP3p4XPT</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948630939248267265?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Wow, Just looked at the comments section on Breitbart. Wow. When Bannon has lost Breitbart, he&#8217;s left with . . . umm, nothing.
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948632834000019457?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
It would be amazing if there would have been a nice simple path to keeping this seat with a nice 30 point margin&#8230; <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/thankssteve?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#thankssteve</a> <a href="https://t.co/uB7DXMZjiH">https://t.co/uB7DXMZjiH</a>
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948634506759692288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Andrew Breitbart would be ashamed of the division and lies Steve Bannon is spreading!
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948638652850061312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet"></div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Steve had the honor of working in the White House &amp; serving the country. Unfortunately, he squandered that privilege &amp; turned that opportunity into a nightmare of backstabbing, harassing, leaking, lying &amp; undermining the President. Steve is not a strategist, he is an opportunist
&#8212; Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/948678893610913793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
&#8220;Mr. Bannon, the WSJ got an advance copy of that book&#8230;&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/mDvg6h2Qy6">pic.twitter.com/mDvg6h2Qy6</a>
&#8212; Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) <a href="https://twitter.com/KurtSchlichter/status/948664333583532032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>

Menu