When The Scientific Experts Abandon Science For Politics

A worker in a laboratory in the offices of the Central Forensic Customs Administration of the Federal Customs Service of the Russian Federation.
Sergei Fadeichev\TASS via Getty Images
 

This week, the American Psychological Association proved that it is a political body rather than a scientific one. This isn’t the first time a major mental health organization has favored politics over science — in 2013, the American Psychiatric Association famously reclassified gender identity disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, calling it gender dysphoria and then explaining that living with the delusion that you are a member of the opposite sex is not actually a mental disorder at all. That ruling was based on zero scientific evidence — much like the original DSM-V classification of pedophilia as a “sexual orientation” before renaming it “pedophilic disorder” under public pressure.

 

The latest example of the American Psychological Association’s political hackery concerns the topic of “traditional masculinity.” In their journal, the APA announced that they had released new guidelines to “help psychologists work with men and boys.” Those guidelines suggested that “40 years of research” show that “traditional masculinity is psychologically harmful and that socializing boys to suppress their emotions causes damage that echoes both inwardly and outwardly.” The APA explains that “traditional masculinity – marked by stoicism, competitiveness, dominance and aggression – is, on the whole, harmful. Men socialized in this way are less likely to engage in healthy behaviors.”

Never mind that traditional masculinity — a masculinity geared toward channeling masculine instincts toward building and protecting rather than tearing down — built Western civilization and protected it from the brutalities of other civilizational forces. Never mind that traditional masculinity protected femininity and elevated women to equal status in public policy. Traditional masculinity is actually just men sitting around and eating burgers while grunting at each other about football, all the while crying on the inside because they have been prohibited by society from showing their feelings.

And it’s worse than that. According to the APA, traditional masculinity bumps up “against issues of race, class and sexuality,” maximizing both interior and exterior conflict. Ryan McDermott, psychologist from the University of South Alabama who helped draft the new APA guidelines, suggested that gender is “no longer just this male-female binary.” Rather, gender is a mere social construct that can be destroyed without consequence. Here’s the APA, making the extraordinarily dishonest statement that gender differences aren’t biological at all, in contravention of all known social science research: “Indeed, when researchers, strip away stereotypes and expectations, there isn’t much difference in the basic behaviors of men and women.”

Destroy masculinity in order to destroy discrimination and depression. Feminize men, and indoctrinate boys.

 

In order to reach this conclusion, the APA has to define traditional masculinity in the narrowest, most negative possible terms — and then to other those who disagree as part of the patriarchy. But as a political body, the APA has little problem doing this.

All of this is not only nonsense, it’s wildly counterproductive nonsense. Buried beneath the reams of nonsense in the APA report is this rather telling gem: “It’s also important to encourage pro-social aspects of masculinity…In certain circumstances, traits like stoicism and self-sacrifice can be absolutely crucial.” But we must never suggest that such traits ought to included as part of a “traditional masculinity,” because that would make some people feel excluded.

 

Here’s the truth: men are looking for meaning in a world that tells them that they are perpetuators of discrimination and rape culture; that they are beneficiaries of an overarching, nasty patriarchy; that they are, at best, disposable partners to women rather than protectors of them. Giving men purpose requires us to give them purpose as men, not merely as genderless beings. There’s a lot to be said for the idea that our culture has ignored the necessity for men to become gentlemen — but that’s a result of a Left-wing culture that denigrates men, not a traditional masculinity built on the idea that men were born to defend, protect, and build.

One thing is certainly true, though: the APA has destroyed itself on the shoals of politics. And there’s no reason for honest-thinking people to take its anti-scientific pronouncements seriously simply because they masquerade as scientists while ignoring facts in favor of political correctness.

COPYRIGHT CREATORS 2019

What's Your Reaction?