Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) took a wave of backlash on Thursday after he claimed during a House hearing that &#8220;men do not compete in women&#8217;s sports.&#8221;
Nadler&#8217;s comment was a response to Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY), who had offered into evidence a list of instances in which men had usurped women&#8217;s sporting events to make them their own.
&#8220;I ask for unanimous consent to submit for the record instances of men hijacking women&#8217;s sports and the various examples that we have demonstrating not only injuries that have been suffered by women as men have participated in girls&#8217; sports, but also the women — the girls and women who have been affected by this, including Riley Gaines, when Will Thomas decided to join the female — the women&#8217;s swimming team in Pennsylvania,&#8221; Hageman said.
&#8220;I object to concluding these mistruths in the record,&#8221; was Nadler&#8217;s reply.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Rep Hageman: &quot;I ask for unanimous consent to submit for the record instances of men hijacking women&#39;s sports&quot; 
Rep Nadler: &quot;I object to concluding these mistruths in the record&quot; 
This is an attempt to erase and rewrite history. Make no mistake, Nadler is a grade-A communist. <a href="https://t.co/lakg4WccbB">pic.twitter.com/lakg4WccbB</a>
&mdash; Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) <a href="https://twitter.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1770862586235437168?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 21, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Hageman responded to Nadler&#8217;s objection, saying it was telling that he did not want the information she was providing entered into the record.
Nadler doubled down, claiming, &#8220;Men do not compete in women&#8217;s sports.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/RepJerryNadler?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RepJerryNadler</a>: &quot;Men do not compete in women&#39;s sports.&quot; 
Who wants to tell him about Lia Thomas &#8212; a man, who has competed in women&#39;s sports.<a href="https://twitter.com/Riley_Gaines_?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Riley_Gaines_</a>? <a href="https://t.co/LLjUTzD1jJ">pic.twitter.com/LLjUTzD1jJ</a>
&mdash; House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) <a href="https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1770829020365512917?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 21, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
But critics — former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines among them — pointed to trans-identifying swimmer Lia Thomas, who had competed against biological women in the 2022 NCAA championships.
&#8220;Ironic he says this on the EXACT 2 year anniversary of this photo being taken,&#8221; Gaines replied, sharing a photo of herself next to Thomas on the awards podium. &#8220;This 6&#8217;4&#8243; man isn&#8217;t fooling anyone with any amount of common sense. 2 years ago today I had a fire lit under me and communists like Nadler continue to fuel it.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Ironic he says this on the EXACT 2 year anniversary of this photo being taken. This 6&#39;4&quot; man isn&#39;t fooling anyone with any amount of common sense. 
2 years ago today I had a fire lit under me and communists like Nadler continue to fuel it. <a href="https://t.co/D0xnL1kfL9">https://t.co/D0xnL1kfL9</a> <a href="https://t.co/jqouIQWCxC">pic.twitter.com/jqouIQWCxC</a>
&mdash; Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) <a href="https://twitter.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1770863899622903967?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 21, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;It’s even worse. Now he’s telling our committee that there are more than two sexes,&#8221; Hageman offered as a follow-up. &#8220;You’re either a male or a female, and you should compete against your own biological gender in sports.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
It’s even worse. Now he’s telling our committee that there are more than two sexes. 
You’re either a male or a female, and you should compete against your own biological gender in sports. <a href="https://t.co/pRA9Xty8A1">https://t.co/pRA9Xty8A1</a>
&mdash; Rep. Harriet Hageman (@RepHageman) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepHageman/status/1770849455593467921?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 21, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The issue is so pervasive that it inspired The Daily Wire&#8217;s own original comedy film &#8220;Lady Ballers.&#8221;
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Lady Ballers | Official Trailer" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Py2MzGtmaJ0?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

NCAA SWIMMING: MAR 18 Women’s Swimming & Diving Championships

Jerry Nadler Blasted For Claiming ‘Men Don’t Compete In Women’s Sports’

Jerry Nadler Blasted For Claiming 'Men Don't Compete In Women's Sports'

Congress

Jerry Nadler

Politics

Transgender Athletes

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) faced backlash this week after arguing during a congressional hearing that the U.S. needs &#8220;many <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/illegal-immigration" target="_blank" rel="noopener">illegal immigrants</a>,&#8221; which comes as the U.S. experiences a historic flood of illegal aliens into the country because of President Joe Biden&#8217;s policies.
Nadler made the remarks during a House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement hearing on Thursday about the &#8220;Impact of Illegal Immigration on Social Services.&#8221;
&#8220;We need immigrants in this country,&#8221; Nadler said. &#8220;Forget the fact that our vegetables would rot in the ground if they weren&#8217;t being picked by many immigrants — many illegal immigrants.&#8221;
&#8220;The fact is the birth rate in this country is way below replacement level, which means our population is going to start shrinking,&#8221; he added. &#8220;And the ratio of people on Social Security and Medicare is going to increase relative to the number of people supporting them.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Imagine if a Republican said this and not Democrat Rep. Jerry Nadler:
&quot;Our vegetables would rot in the ground if they weren&#39;t being picked by many immigrants — many illegal immigrants!&quot;
 <a href="https://t.co/4SCH0TDen7">pic.twitter.com/4SCH0TDen7</a>
&mdash; Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1745644087972090220?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Former Trump administration immigration adviser Stephen Miller responded to Nadler&#8217;s remarks on X: &#8220;Yes, all the millions of illegals from 150+ countries spanning the globe are going to Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas, New York, etc. to work in the fields.&#8221;
&#8220;What a tired, vapid, exhausted and stupid cliche,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;Just utter nonsense.&#8221;
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) also called out Nadler, writing: &#8220;Immigrants do more than pick vegetables, Jerry — they contribute to our economy, our culture, our community. They are doctors, nurses, home health aides, lawyers, professionals, and yes, ag workers.&#8221;
&#8220;No one is against immigration — but there must be a process,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;What is happening at the border is a catastrophe and cannot continue. Secure the border and fix our broken immigration system so that those who want to come here and contribute to our economy can do so, and do so legally.&#8221;

Celebrity Sightings In New York City – June 25, 2023

Democrat Jerry Nadler Slammed After Claiming ‘Many Illegal Immigrants’ Needed To Pick Vegetables

Democrat Jerry Nadler Slammed After Claiming 'Many Illegal Immigrants' Needed To Pick Vegetables

Border Crisis

Illegal Immigration

U.S. Senate

Shortly after the 2018 midterms, Jerry Nadler — who was about to become the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee — boarded an Acela train from New York to Washington. When he got to his seat, he began loudly speaking on the phone with someone who remains unknown to this day. Unfortunately for Nadler, the editor-in-chief of the conservative website The Federalist, Mollie Hemingway, was seated nearby, jotting down notes about the whole conversation.
Hemingway <a href="https://thefederalist.com/2018/11/07/incoming-democrat-chairman-dems-will-go-all-in-on-russia-impeach-kavanaugh-for-perjury/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">overheard</a> Nadler outline, in no uncertain terms, Democrats&#8217; plans for going, &#8220;all-in&#8221; on investigating and ultimately impeaching Donald Trump. It was much more important for Democrats to impeach Donald Trump than Brett Kavanaugh, Nadler said, because going after Kavanaugh might remind voters of Joe Biden&#8217;s disastrous handling of Anita Hill&#8217;s sexual harassment allegations against Clarence Thomas. That could harm Joe Biden&#8217;s chances of becoming president. So, Nadler said, the safe play was to impeach Donald Trump for colluding with Russia, which is an accusation that Jerry Nadler has never had any evidence to support. If Democrats went with that strategy, Nadler said on the phone, it would clear the way for a Joe Biden presidency.
In one sense, what Mollie Hemingway overheard wasn&#8217;t surprising. More than a year earlier, just minutes after Donald Trump was inaugurated, The Washington Post <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/2017/live-updates/politics/live-coverage-of-trumps-inauguration/the-campaign-to-impeach-president-trump-has-begun/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a>, &#8220;The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun.&#8221; But in retrospect, Jerry Nadler&#8217;s remarks on that train back in 2018 didn&#8217;t just foreshadow Donald Trump&#8217;s two impeachments, or the presidency of Joe Biden. They also established the blueprint for how Leftists would treat all political investigations moving forward. They have no interest in the evidence. They don&#8217;t care about the law. Their goal, instead, is to use the force of the legal system to punish their enemies.
This was a shift that was much bigger than Jerry Nadler. The same year that Nadler made those remarks on the Acela, Letitia James was campaigning to become New York&#8217;s attorney general. And she said pretty much the same thing. She <a href="https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2018/12/24/how-letitia-james-says-she-plans-to-investigate-president-donald-trump-once-new-york-attorney-general" target="_blank" rel="noopener">promised</a> to find some way to take Donald Trump to court, however implausible. Aand she followed through.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1278-the-matt-walsh-show" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
One of the many problems with this strategy is that it&#8217;s short-sighted. Democrats failed to ensure they&#8217;d hold onto political power forever. That&#8217;s certainly their goal. It&#8217;s the entire justification for their immigration policy. But they haven&#8217;t achieved it yet. So right now, Republicans are in control of the House of Representatives. And yesterday, they announced their own impeachment inquiry. They&#8217;re looking primarily at whether Joe Biden sold favors to overseas interests, particularly in Ukraine and China. 
In a moment, I&#8217;ll go into some of the evidence that justifies this inquiry. But really, we don&#8217;t have to go into all of it. Once Jerry Nadler adopted the Stalinist standard for impeachment — basically, &#8220;show me a man and I&#8217;ll show you the crime&#8221; — then evidence became moot. Impeachment is all about raw political power now. It&#8217;s not about evidence. And it&#8217;s certainly not about fairness, or the rule of law.
The White House and the Biden family know all of this. That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re not even pretending to defend themselves. Hunter Biden went in front of the cameras and announced he&#8217;s not going to comply with a congressional subpoena he was served. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Hunter Biden refuses to comply with <a href="https://twitter.com/JamesComer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JamesComer</a>&#39;s subpoena to be deposed behind closed doors and demands a public hearing so he can tell sob stories on TV.
Reminder that Don Jr. testified behind closed doors for over 40 hours about the Russia hoax.
Hold him in contempt! <a href="https://t.co/1FoJB06zyX">pic.twitter.com/1FoJB06zyX</a>
&mdash; Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1734951290575171650?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 13, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Hunter Biden received a lawful subpoena for closed-door testimony. This is the same kind of subpoena Donald Trump Jr. and many other Trump aides were forced to comply with, for hours on end. But he just doesn&#8217;t want to do it, so he refuses.
And his justification for refusing is completely absurd. There&#8217;s no legal basis for it, and Hunter Biden isn&#8217;t pretending there is one. Instead, he&#8217;s saying he wants to testify in front of the news media, instead of a closed-door session. It&#8217;s just his preference, and he seems to think that his preference is somehow binding on Congress.
It was just a couple of years ago that former Trump adviser Steve Bannon <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/steve-bannon-subpoena-january-6-select-committee/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">defied</a> a congressional subpoena. Unlike Hunter Biden, he had a reason for doing so. He argued it was unlawful for Congress to compel him to testify about his work in the White House, citing executive privilege. 
Now, whatever you make of that defense, it&#8217;s clearly rooted in the law. It&#8217;s <a href="https://rollcall.com/2023/11/09/appeals-court-skeptical-of-bannon-push-to-overturn-contempt-of-congress-convictions/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">working</a> its way through the federal appellate process as we speak. What happened to Steve Bannon because he asserted that defense? He was sentenced to four months in prison:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Steve Bannon to jail: Sentenced to 4 months for defying Jan. 6 subpoena | LiveNOW from FOX" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/IW9F6qhHNL0?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Is that going to happen to Hunter Biden? As of now, congressional Republicans are threatening to hold him in contempt of Congress, which they obviously should. But then there&#8217;s the question of whether Joe Biden&#8217;s DOJ will pursue criminal charges. Will they throw Hunter Biden in prison for this? Will they demand he testify, under oath, about his father&#8217;s involvement in his business?
That&#8217;s an open question. Right now, the DOJ is pursuing charges against Hunter Biden about his fraudulent gun form, and his tax evasion. But those charges don&#8217;t directly relate to the main issue in this impeachment inquiry, which is where Hunter Biden got all of his money from — and more importantly, Joe Biden&#8217;s involvement in procuring that money.
Yesterday a reporter at Fox asked the White House press secretary about all of this. She proceeded to make it clear that Joe Biden knew that Hunter would defy the congressional subpoena. Beyond that, she just made light of the whole situation. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
KJP to Doocy on whether President Biden knew his son would defy a congresional subpoena: &quot;I don&#39;t have anything else to add. The President was familiar with what Hunter was going to say today &amp;, you know, look, he&#39;s proud of his son&#8230;how he&#39;s rebuilding his life back. He&#39;s going… <a href="https://t.co/envjQGxsEl">pic.twitter.com/envjQGxsEl</a>
&mdash; Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) <a href="https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1735033883521888432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 13, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This kind of question should be extremely easy to answer. If you&#8217;re asked whether the president told his son to defy a congressional subpoena, you should be able to respond and explain yourself. Instead, the White House press secretary cracks a joke, and starts talking about how much Joe Biden loves his son.
What this means, almost certainly, is that Joe Biden did advise his son to defy the congressional subpoena, without any legal basis whatsoever. Under the standards Democrats established with Steve Bannon and several other Trump aides, that&#8217;s a crime. 
And there&#8217;s an obvious motive for why Joe Biden would want his son to commit this crime. Hunter Biden himself made that motive very clear during his remarks to reporters yesterday. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Hunter Biden moves the goalposts again: &quot;My father was not financially involved in my business&quot; <a href="https://t.co/n9L3miu2h8">pic.twitter.com/n9L3miu2h8</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1734947767322132791?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 13, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Did you catch the qualifier there? Hunter wants you to know that his father was not &#8220;financially involved&#8221; in his business dealings with corrupt oligarchs in Ukraine and China. So this is not a denial that Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden&#8217;s business dealings. Now it&#8217;s a denial that Joe Biden was &#8220;financially&#8221; involved.
This is a very different claim from the one Joe Biden has been making for years. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
This is one HELL of a new qualifier from Hunter Biden. 
Hunter now says, “My father was not financially involved in my business”
FLASHBACK: Joe Biden used to say he has never talked about business with his family. This is a major shift from the Bidens. <a href="https://t.co/4oiALdD4Yg">pic.twitter.com/4oiALdD4Yg</a>
&mdash; Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1734950116165886123?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 13, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The reason for this change is the Biden family knows they can&#8217;t deny a direct link between Joe Biden and Hunter Biden&#8217;s influence peddling operation. Devon Archer, one of Hunter Biden&#8217;s business associates, has already <a href="https://x.com/SpeakerJohnson/status/1734928534156595442?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">testified</a> in front of the House of Representatives, saying that Joe Biden spoke with Hunter Biden&#8217;s business partners roughly 20 times. Those conversations, according to Archer, took place while Joe Biden was the sitting vice president of the United States.  
The Wall Street Journal also reported that Archer testified that, &#8220;Burisma would have gone out of business if it didn&#8217;t have the [Biden] brand attached to it.&#8221; As you will recall, Burisma is the Ukraine oil company that paid Hunter Biden tens of thousands of dollars a month for a no-show job, despite Hunter Biden having no oil expertise whatsoever. Burisma was being investigated by Ukraine&#8217;s attorney general, up until Joe Biden threatened to withhold money to Ukraine&#8217;s government until they fired him.
Then there&#8217;s the fact that Joe Biden used a fake name to email with Hunter&#8217;s business partners. There&#8217;s also the many public comments of Tony Bobulinski, the Hunter Biden business partner who has repeatedly said that Joe Biden personally profited from Hunter Biden&#8217;s influence peddling. Bobulinski — who had no reason to lie whatsoever — told Tucker Carlson that Joe Biden was the &#8220;big guy&#8221; referenced repeatedly in emails on Hunter Biden&#8217;s laptop. The Big Guy, according to the emails, was slated to receive 10% of the profits from one business venture in China.
It&#8217;s important to recount all of this because even now, Democrats are claiming that there are no witnesses to support the idea that Joe Biden could possibly be corrupt. Here&#8217;s AOC for example:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
&quot;They have not called a single witness, a single first-hand witness to any of their allegations.&quot;
AOC says Republicans don&#39;t have witnesses to back up their alleged allegations of Hunter Biden&#39;s financial crimes. <a href="https://t.co/mMca5v7UhL">pic.twitter.com/mMca5v7UhL</a>
&mdash; Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) <a href="https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1734973868886851912?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 13, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This is how the Left plans to respond to the congressional investigation into Joe Biden. They&#8217;ll deny reality. They&#8217;ll pretend that witnesses don&#8217;t exist, even when those witnesses have appeared before Congress and on primetime television. They&#8217;ll make fun of you, as Karine Jean-Pierre did yesterday.
All of this was foreseeable when Jerry Nadler, Leticia James, and other top Democrats decided to use the legal system and the impeachment process to punish their political opponents. It was inevitable that soon enough, they&#8217;d be forced to admit they can&#8217;t possibly live up to their own nonexistent standards. Just five years after Jerry Nadler&#8217;s conversation on that Acela, that moment is here now.
Conservatives can either take advantage of it, or they can do what they usually do. They can make a big show for the cameras and completely fail to follow through. It&#8217;s clear that Karine Jean-Pierre and Hunter Biden think that will happen. They don&#8217;t believe their political enemies are anywhere near as ruthless and cynical as they are. For once, it&#8217;s time for conservatives to prove them wrong.

Hunter Biden Addresses Being Called To Testify To House Oversight Committee On Capitol Hill

It’s Time To Hold The Biden Crime Family Accountable

It's Time To Hold The Biden Crime Family Accountable

Burisma

Hunter Biden

Joe Biden

Karine Jean-Pierre

Matt Walsh

Readers Pass

U.S. House of Representatives

Rep. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jerry-nadler" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jerry Nadler</a> (D-NY) said on the House floor Wednesday that it would have been “child abuse” for 2-year-olds to not be masked during the COVID pandemic. 
Nadler’s comments came during debate on the House floor on the REINS Act after Rep. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/chip-roy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Chip Roy</a> (R-TX) moved to add an amendment to the bill that would <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nadler-toddlers-shouldve-required-mask-during-covid-parents-didnt-committed-child-abuse" target="_blank" rel="noopener">effectively give</a> Congress the power to vote on any vaccine mandate initiated via executive branch rule-making, such as President Joe Biden&#8217;s <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/supreme-court-ruling-biden-covid-vaccine-mandates.html">now-defunct</a> COVID vaccine mandate. 
&#8220;Two-year-olds should have been required to wear masks. It would be child abuse for parents not to do that because there was no vaccination available for 2-year-olds,&#8221; Nadler said. &#8220;And the only way to protect them against COVID was to have them wear masks, and these mandates are meant to protect the public’s health and safety.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Nadler: &quot;When we have a pandemic like covid, two-year-olds should have been required to wear masks. It would be child abuse for parents not to do that.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/8dcF9MJhDC">pic.twitter.com/8dcF9MJhDC</a>
&mdash; Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1669045672404762624?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 14, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The comments from the New York Democrat came after Roy criticized Health and Human Services Secretary <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/xavier-becerra" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Xavier Becerra</a>’s appearance before Congress on Tuesday. 
“I want everybody in America to understand what they just heard from the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee in the United States House of Representatives,&#8221; Roy <a href="https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/watch-house-dem-says-2-year-olds-should-have-been-required-to-wear-masks/?utm_source=actengage&amp;utm_campaign=FreedomMail&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in response to Nadler. &#8220;Your 2-year-old should be forced to be masked. That is what the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee just said here on the floor of the House of Representatives. That the power of the government, the full power of the federal government, should be a part of ensuring and enforcing your children, your 2-year-old child to be masked.&#8221;
Becerra had been asked on Tuesday if &#8220;forcing 2-year-olds to wear masks save lives” by Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA). 
“Making sure people were masked when it was appropriate was essential to make sure that we were able to get out of this pandemic,&#8221; Becerra responded. 
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-36700">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
Roy&#8217;s amendment passed along with the REINS Act, a bill <a href="https://mcmorris.house.gov/posts/mcmorris-rodgers-helps-pass-the-reins-act-to-check-bidens-reckless-spending" target="_blank" rel="noopener">designed</a> to give Congress more oversight over presidential executive actions.
Young children were at very low risk of developing a serious health outcome from catching COVID, and recent studies have <a href="https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suggested</a> that masks are seemingly not that effective at reducing the spread of COVID. 
Although Biden officially <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-officially-ends-covid-19-national-emergency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ended the COVID national emergency declaration</a> in April, the White House came under fire again this month after an <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/white-house-enforcing-mask-mandates-social-distancing-for-unvaccinated-visitors" target="_blank" rel="noopener">email showed</a> that it would be enforcing a mask mandate and social distancing guidelines for visitors who are unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated.
Lawmakers invited to attend “College Athlete Day,” where athletes from championship collegiate teams get to visit the White House, were told to mask up for the event if they are not vaccinated
After backlash, the White House <a href="https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/masks-and-social-distancing-required-unvaccinated-college-athlete-day-white" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> the email had been sent “inadvertently” and that it would be sending out updated guidelines to event attendees.

Attorney General Barr Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee

Jerry Nadler: It Would Have Been ‘Child Abuse’ To Not Mask 2-Year-Olds During Pandemic

Chip Roy

COVID-19

Mask Mandate

Xavier Becerra

Representative <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jerry-nadler" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jerry Nadler</a> (D-NY) sure seems carefree about World War III potentially starting over Ukraine.
On Thursday, a reporter caught up with the septuagenarian, who promptly spilled the beans that he would not care whatsoever if Ukraine invaded Russia, let alone if they did so with U.S.-supplied weapons.
&#8220;Are you concerned that they will enter into Russian territory?&#8221; The Epoch Times’ Liam Cosgrove said of Ukraine.
&#8220;I&#8217;m not concerned. I wouldn&#8217;t care if they did,&#8221; Nadler said.
After the reporter explained that Russia could view this as a U.S.-backed invasion of Russia, the congressman was dismissive and even smirked about the intensification of the war.
Nadler also refused to say if he would condemn Ukraine if they used American-made F-16s to attack Russia.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
BREAKING: Rep. Jerry Nadler says he “wouldn’t care” if Ukraine used American F16s to strike Russian territory and “personally wouldn’t mind” if Ukraine invaded Russia. 
via: <a href="https://twitter.com/cosgrove_iv?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@cosgrove_iv</a> <a href="https://t.co/HbVB1vEqDh">pic.twitter.com/HbVB1vEqDh</a>
&mdash; Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1661819287076495363?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 25, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Last week, it was <a href="https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-russia-war-f16-biden-a281e3cd1474b2e6f453946075824565" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> that Biden backed sending American F-16s to Russia. It is uncertain whether the U.S. will send its own F-16s or whether it will simply allow European countries to export American F-16s to Ukraine. This decision came after months of the Biden administration denying that the U.S. would ever do so. Biden was reportedly pressured into sending the jets by the Pentagon and European allies. He eventually relented.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-11618">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
In response, Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/ukraines-army-will-see-long-term-significance-f-16s-ex-ambassador-1801972#:~:text=%22We%20see%20that%20the%20Western,involves%20enormous%20risks%20for%20themselves." target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a>, “We see that the Western countries are still adhering to the escalation scenario.&#8221;
Grushko intimated that the West could suffer even more consequences if that happened.
<p class="paragraph inline-placeholder" data-uri="cms.cnn.com/_components/paragraph/instances/paragraph_D6F4E560-7D38-F29E-28D9-3A1BCBEBF173@published" data-editable="text" data-component-name="paragraph" data-analytics-observe="off">&#8220;It involves enormous risks for themselves,&#8221; Grushko added. &#8220;In any case, this will be taken into account in all our plans, and we have all the necessary means to achieve the set goals.&#8221;
Grushko&#8217;s assessment isn&#8217;t simply Russian propaganda.
The Biden administration has long felt that providing the planes could prolong the war and increase its volatility.
Per <a href="https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-russia-war-f16-biden-a281e3cd1474b2e6f453946075824565" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Associated Press</a>, &#8220;…with this decision, the Biden administration has made a sharp reversal, after refusing to approve any transfer of the aircraft or conduct training for more than a year due to worries that it could escalate tensions with Russia. U.S. officials also have argued against the F-16 by saying that learning to fly and logistically support such an advanced aircraft would be difficult and take months.&#8221;
What does escalation look like? Well, at the very least it means more dead Ukrainians and Russians. The death toll in the war is already in the hundreds-of-thousands. At worst, it means that NATO is dragged into the war — which means that the U.S. would be also.
You wouldn&#8217;t think that is a laughing matter for a member of Congress. Nadler is pretty nonchalant about it all — even absolving himself of any responsibility. It is a pretty serious issue that requires statesmanship, but we&#8217;re not led by serious men at this time. We are being sleepwalked by fools like Nadler into war with nuclear power.
<div class="css-j7qwjs">
The views expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
</div>

House Judiciary Committee Holds Markup On Justice In Policing Act

Jerry Nadler Sure Seems Carefree About World War III Starting

Global Politics

Putin

Ukraine

Ukraine-Russia War

Volodymyr Zelensky

World

Congressman <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/topic/jerry-nadler/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jerry Nadler</a> (D-NY) reportedly fought with fellow Democratic leaders  — including House Speaker <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/topic/nancy-pelosi/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nancy Pelosi</a> (D-CA) and Impeachment Manager <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/adam-schiff/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Adam Schiff</a> (D-CA) — over the first impeachment proceedings against former President Donald Trump.
According to a new book from Politico Playbook&#8217;s Rachael Bade and The Washington Post&#8217;s Karoun Demirjian — &#8220;Unchecked: The Untold Story Behind Congress’s Botched Impeachments of Donald Trump&#8221; — <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/nadler-wins-vicious-battle-of-far-left-nyc-house-incumbents-prompted-by-botched-redistricting/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nadler</a> worried that the proceedings were &#8220;unconstitutional&#8221; and <a href="https://www.mediaite.com/politics/jerry-nadler-clashed-with-pelosi-dems-over-trump-impeachment-deemed-it-unconstitutional-per-report/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">voiced concern</a> over not allowing Trump a vigorous defense.
Fox News <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nadler-feuded-schiff-pelosi-unconstitutional-impeachment-donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">detailed excerpts</a> of the book, set to be released on October 18, noting that Nadler specifically took issue with Schiff&#8217;s plan to proceed with impeachment regarding Trump&#8217;s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — without ensuring the former president had due process.
&#8220;It’s unfair, and it’s unprecedented, and it’s unconstitutional,&#8221; Nadler reportedly said, complaining that his Judiciary Committee would not have the chance to cross-examine the witnesses as they had in the past.
&#8220;I don’t appreciate your tone. I worry you’re putting us in a box for our investigation,&#8221; was Schiff&#8217;s alleged response to Nadler&#8217;s objections.
Pelosi reportedly all-but sidelined Nadler then, choosing not to give the Judiciary Committee the same power it had enjoyed during previous impeachments.
&#8220;She didn’t want the Judiciary panel to interview witnesses at all. Pelosi simply didn’t trust the panel — which was stacked with liberal crusaders and hotheaded conservatives — to handle the rollout of the complex Ukraine narrative with the careful, compelling treatment it required,&#8221; the authors wrote. &#8220;She couldn’t afford another Nadler screwup. The Judiciary chairman could focus on the legal business of crafting the articles of impeachment and have academics testify, she allowed. But that was it.&#8221;
Nadler continued to push back, however, reportedly warning Schiff and Pelosi that they would be vulnerable to complaints about the process if they refused to allow Trump to face his accusers or mount a defense.
&#8220;If we’re going to impeach, we need to show the country that we gave the president ample opportunity to defend himself,&#8221; he said — but Pelosi and Schiff were reportedly concerned that Trump&#8217;s attorneys might say something that could damage President Joe Biden ahead of the 2020 presidential election.
The alleged response from Schiff&#8217;s team was unequivocal: &#8220;F*** Donald Trump.&#8221;
Nadler tried once more to sway the two, saying that he &#8220;resented&#8221; being told how to run his own committee and allegedly asking, &#8220;They’re going to argue we don’t have due process for Trump. Why make that argument real?&#8221;
&#8220;I don’t really care about your resentment. Neither the Speaker nor I agree,&#8221; Schiff reportedly shot back.

U.S. House Of Representatives Votes On Impeachment Of President Donald Trump

New Book Says Top Democrat Bucked Trump Impeachment: ‘It’s Unfair, And It’s Unprecedented, And It’s Unconstitutional’

New Book Says Top Democrat Jerry Nadler Bucked Trump Impeachment

Adam Schiff

Donald Trump

Impeachment

Nancy Pelosi

<div>
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jerrold-nadler" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rep. Jerry Nadler</a> crushed fellow liberal House member Carolyn Maloney Tuesday in a bruising Democratic primary that forced <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/new-york-city" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Manhattan</a>’s chattering class to choose between two longtime allies in a redrawn congressional district.
</div>
<div>
The lawmakers, who have spent a combined 60 years in the House of Representatives, clashed bitterly during the primary battle for New York’s 12th Congressional district, with Maloney’s camp floating a claim the 75-year-old Nadler was senile. After her loss, Maloney, 76, blamed “sexist systems and misogyny.”
</div>
<div>
“I’m really sad that we no longer have a woman representing Manhattan in Congress,” Maloney told dejected supporters Tuesday night.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
As Nadler &quot;addressed boosters on Upper West Side Tuesday night, the mood at Maloney party in Chelsea turned mutinous, as her supporters booed and jeered the House Judiciary Committee chair’s televised speech, with some yelling &#39;Traitor!&#39;&quot;<a href="https://t.co/mC2SKeKHrX">https://t.co/mC2SKeKHrX</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/nypmetro?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nypmetro</a>
&mdash; Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) <a href="https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1562270767764717568?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</div>
<div>
Nadler won just over 55% of the vote to Maloney’s 24.4%. Attorney Suraj Patel, who was challenging Maloney for a third consecutive cycle, had 19.1%
</div>
<div>
“I think the voters made their voices heard tonight,” Nadler said at his victory party on Manhattan’s tony Upper West Side.
</div>
<div>
The battle came about when lawmakers in New York’s Democrat-led state legislature screwed up attempts to gerrymander House districts and mashed key parts of Nadler’s old district with Maloney’s. It became an all-out war between Nadler, the portly chariman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Maloney, who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
</div>
<div>
“I think Carolyn and I have worked on a lot of things together but I think I have a more principled, progressive record,” Nadler told reporters Tuesday.
“She voted for war in Iraq, I voted against it,” he said. “She voted for the Patriot Act, I voted against it. She voted against the Iran deal, I voted for the Iran deal.”
</div>
<div>
The race became especially bitter after Nadler boasted in a magazine interview about bringing mass transit pork back to Manhattan and Maloney called him a liar.
</div>
<div>
“He was not at the groundbreaking, he was not at the ribbon-cutting, he was not at any of the meetings I had with the MTA,” she said of Nadler’s role in a key subway project. “We had hearings on it in the city, and he never came to any of them. He’s lying.”
</div>
<div>
Just last weekend, Maloney quoted a <a href="https://nypost.com/2022/08/19/some-catty-notes-on-nys-dem-house-primaries/">New York Post editorial </a>that described Nadler as “this close to senile” after he mixed up presidents Trump and Bush in a debate while bragging about getting Trump impeached twice.
</div>
<div>
“They call him ‘senile,’” said Maloney. “They cite his performance at the debate where he couldn’t even remember who he impeached. He said he impeached Bush!”
</div>
<div>
Perhaps the two most powerful liberal voices in New York, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and The New York Times, both endorsed Nadler in the race.
</div>

Screen Shot 2022-08-24 at 8.11.12 AM

Nadler Wins Vicious Battle Of Far-Left NYC House Incumbents Prompted By Botched Redistricting

2022 Midterms

Jerrold Nadler

New York City

As Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) scramble for the one seat left on New York&#8217;s new district map, the attacks are getting personal.
Seventy-six-year-old Maloney <a href="https://www.mediaite.com/news/they-call-him-senile-trainwreck-democratic-primary-between-two-house-lifers-gets-intense-as-maloney-questions-nadlers-mental-state/?utm_source=mostpopular">suggested</a> during a Saturday meeting with reporters in Manhattan that Nadler is senile by referencing a recent editorial that pointed out Nadler&#8217;s debate gaffes.
“They call him senile,” Maloney told reporters. “They cite his performance at the debate where he couldn’t even remember who he impeached. He said he impeached Bush.”
The New York Post editorial that Maloney referred to described 75-year-old Nadler as &#8220;<a href="https://nypost.com/2022/08/19/some-catty-notes-on-nys-dem-house-primaries/">this close to senile</a> in that epic NY1 debate,&#8221; when he said he voted to impeach former President George W. Bush instead of former President Donald Trump.
Nadler told a reporter on Tuesday that he would not dignify Maloney&#8217;s remarks with a response.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/JerryNadler?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JerryNadler</a> tells me he won’t dignify Maloney’s insinuation that he’s senile with a response. <a href="https://t.co/TFwX2LGC3U">pic.twitter.com/TFwX2LGC3U</a>
&mdash; Daniel Marans (@danielmarans) <a href="https://twitter.com/danielmarans/status/1562077677326147585?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 23, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Maloney is not free from gaffes herself.
During an on the record conversation with the New York Times editorial board, Maloney said of President Joe Biden, &#8220;off the record, he&#8217;s not running again.&#8221; The publication had never agreed to her terms and thus printed the remark.
And during a CNN hit in early August, Maloney praised Biden while suggesting he wouldn&#8217;t run again in 2024.
“Mr. President, I apologize,” Maloney said during the hit. “I want you to run. I happen to think you won’t be running, but when you run or if you run, I will be there 100%. You have deserved it. You are a great president, and thank you for everything you’ve done for my state and all the states and all the cities in America. Thank you, Mr. President.&#8221;
Neither Nadler nor Maloney immediately responded to requests for comment from The Daily Wire. Their rivalry has developed, after three decades of the lawmakers serving peaceably side by side, after the re-drawing of Manhattan&#8217;s East and West Sides into one district.
While Nadler <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/new-york-primary.html">seeks to portray himself</a> as a staunch progressive and one of the last Jewish congressmen who represents one of the most Jewish cities in the world, Maloney has accused him of playing identity politics (though she has focused her campaign on the importance of re-electing a powerful woman post Roe v. Wade).

Untitled design

Carolyn Maloney Suggests Jerry Nadler Is Senile As NY Primary Heats Up

Democrats

New York

Former President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> took a shot at Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) Tuesday evening by endorsing her in the Democratic primary for New York&#8217;s 12th Congressional District.
&#8220;A vote for Carolyn Maloney in NY-12 is a vote for the future!&#8221; Trump wrote on social media. &#8220;She is a kind and wonderful person, who has always said terrific things about me, and will support me no matter what I do, just as I supported her very early on. She begged for a check with no quid pro quo, and I gave it to her. In fact, I gave her many.&#8221;
&#8220;On the other hand, Jerry Nadler is likewise a hard driving man of the people, whose energy and attention to detail is unlike anyone else in Congress. He is high energy, sharp, quick-witted, and bright,&#8221; Trump continued. &#8220;You can’t go wrong with either, but Carolyn Maloney is the better man. She will lead our Country into a very GREEN and prosperous future. Carolyn has my Complete and Total Endorsement, she will never let our Conservative Movement down!&#8221;
Maloney appeared angered by the endorsement as she immediately sought to distance herself from it, realizing that it could potentially damage her campaign in the hotly contested race against Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY).
&#8220;This is laughable and I reject any endorsement from Donald Trump,&#8221; Maloney tweeted. &#8220;Trump doesn’t respect women. He instigated the attacks on January 6th and claimed that the 2020 election was a big lie.&#8221;
&#8220;He should be more concerned about the investigation I’m leading as Chair of the Oversight Committee into the storage of his classified documents at Mar-a-Lago,&#8221; Maloney continued. &#8220;Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll pass.&#8221;

The 2021 Met Gala Celebrating In America: A Lexicon Of Fashion – Arrivals

Trump Torches Democrat Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney In Endorsement Of Her: She’s ‘The Better Man’

Trump Torches Democrat Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney In Endorsement Of Her

Democratic Party

Democratic New York Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney is dipping into her retirement fund in order to keep her seat, according to a new report.
The <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/18/nyregion/carolyn-maloney-jerrold-nadler-primary.html">New York Times</a> reported Monday that the 76-year-old Maloney, who has been in Congress since 1992, personally loaned her campaign some $900,000, citing campaign finance filings released Friday. When combined with the $600,000 in outside donations her campaign received in the second quarter of the year and money still unspent, Maloney currently sports a war chest of around $1.5 million, with just a few weeks left before a hotly-contested August 23 primary.
A spokeswoman for Maloney confirmed to NYT that the funds had come out of her House retirement account. Maloney also confirmed the report. “There was never a doubt that I would continue to fight for the people in my district,” she told the paper. “Thus, I decided to use some of my retirement savings to invest in this campaign.”
Maloney is in a heated contest for the newly-redrawn 12th district with fellow Democrat Jerry Nadler. Maloney and Nadler previously served in neighboring districts in Manhattan, but Congressional <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/proposed-new-york-congressional-maps-set-up-primary-battlegrounds-for-high-profile-democrats">redistricting maps</a> redrawn by a court-appointed special master put the two colleagues in the same district, setting up a battle for the seat.  Both Maloney and Nadler are powerful members of the House Progressive Caucus, and both are chairs on influential committees in the House of Representatives. Maloney currently sits as chairwoman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, while Nadler chairs the Judiciary Committee.
For his part, Nadler&#8217;s financial disclosures show that he received $500,000 in donations in the second quarter, but he did not give himself any loans, leaving him with about $1.2 million in cash on hand. Nadler&#8217;s campaign co-manager, Julian Gerson assured NYT that “[we] have the resources we need to run a campaign that’ll talk to every voter.”
A third candidate, Suraj Patel, reported a cash-on-hand figure that was just about half of Nadler&#8217;s war chest. According to his <a href="https://www.surajpatel.nyc/">campaign website</a>, Patel is an attorney and community organizer who served on former President Obama&#8217;s 2008 and 2012 campaigns and in the White House. He challenged Maloney for the nomination in 2020, and came within 3 points of defeating her.
NYT notes that Maloney gave out the loan in late May, after the new Congressional maps had been approved by the Courts. The loan likely also came after the <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-12_m6hn.pdf">Supreme Court</a> sided with Senator Ted Cruz in a lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission over loans he had made to his re-election campaign. In a 6-3 ruling delivered on May 16, the same day New York&#8217;s redrawn maps were unveiled, the Court ruled that limitations on the amount of money a candidate can loan to his campaign violates his or her First Amendment right to conduct political speech. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion that limiting how much money a candidate can loan creates risks that inhibits candidates, especially new and unknown ones, from loaning money to themselves in the first place, thus limiting their ability to conduct political expression.
In addition to the heated primary in NY-12, neighboring NY-10, Nadler&#8217;s old district, is in the midst of a chaotic primary of its own. A total of 18 Democrats are vying for the now-open seat, including Rep. Mondaire Jones, who currently represents the 17th district, former New York City mayor <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/bill-de-blasio-announces-he-will-run-for-congress">Bill de Blasio</a>, and former Trump impeachment counsel Daniel Goldman.

Carolyn Maloney

Top Democrat Dips Into Her Own Retirement Fund In Bid To Keep Her Seat: Report

Report: Top Democrat Dips Into Her Own Retirement Fund In Bid To Keep Her Seat

House Democrats

Second Amendment advocate Dana Loesch tore into House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) on Thursday for claiming that research does not back up the idea that &#8220;women&#8217;s gun ownership increases their safety.&#8221;
&#8220;There is no research to support the idea that women&#8217;s gun ownership increases their safety,&#8221; Nadler said on Thursday as lawmakers marked up a package that would raise the age limit for Americans to buy semi-automatic rifles to 21, as well as ban gun trafficking, require that all guns are traceable, place restrictions on high-capacity magazines, and more.
The legislation follows a tragic shooting in Ulvade, Texas, in which a shooter slaughtered 19 children and two teachers.
If the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7910?s=1&amp;r=1">Protect Our Kids Act</a> gets the necessary votes, Nadler <a href="https://thehill.com/news/house/3509552-nadler-seeks-to-preempt-gop-arguments-on-gun-reform/">told reporters Thursday</a>, it will be on the House floor next week. It is unlikely that it would pass the Senate.
“And we’re working on the assault weapons ban,” <a href="https://thehill.com/news/house/3509520-nadler-says-assault-weapons-ban-will-hit-house-floor-if-we-have-the-votes/">he added</a>, “and if we have the votes then we’ll take that to the vote, too.”
Loesch, who also hosts a nationally syndicated radio show, fired back at Nadler in a tweet that listed a slew of stories about women who defended themselves with guns.
&#8220;Easy for a man protected by guns to mansplain to women that we should disarm,&#8221; she said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Easy for a man protected by guns to mansplain to women that we should disarm. 
Tell this woman, <a href="https://twitter.com/RepJerryNadler?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RepJerryNadler</a> : <a href="https://t.co/TovoS4t5ac">https://t.co/TovoS4t5ac</a> 
Or this woman: <a href="https://t.co/BNn0p4lT7M">https://t.co/BNn0p4lT7M</a>
Or her: <a href="https://t.co/NnDSNRqVAb">https://t.co/NnDSNRqVAb</a>
Nadler wants more Carol Brownes.<a href="https://t.co/ud1lIg4Kux">https://t.co/ud1lIg4Kux</a> <a href="https://t.co/nbGKOd0TSW">https://t.co/nbGKOd0TSW</a>
&mdash; Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) <a href="https://twitter.com/DLoesch/status/1532445323565621248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 2, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Victim of Violent Home Invasion Speaks; Credits Wife With Saving His Life With AR-15,&#8221; <a href="https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/news/2019/11/01/victim-of-violent-home-invasion-speaks--credits-wife-with-saving-his-life">reads one headline</a> cited by Loesch.
&#8220;911 CALL: ‘I just killed him,’ woman won’t face charges after deadly shooting,&#8221; <a href="https://www.whio.com/news/local/911-call-just-killed-him-woman-won-face-charges-after-deadly-shooting/WfNPgGm217QsdXaR271c7M/">reads another</a> about a woman who shot and killed her husband in self defense.
Another of Loesch&#8217;s headlines <a href="https://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/woman-fights-back-shoots-suspect-after-5-men-try-rob-her-atm-cmpd-says/JWBEPHYRQNFELNBBQB7A55NWYE/">reads</a>: &#8220;Woman fights back, shoots suspect after 5 men try to rob her at ATM.&#8221;
&#8220;Nadler wants more Carol Brownes,&#8221; Loesch said, linking to the story &#8220;<a href="https://fox17.com/news/local/woman-killed-while-waiting-for-gun-permit-for-protection">Woman Killed While Waiting for Gun Permit for Protection</a>&#8221; about Carol Brownes, a woman stabbed to death outside her apartment as she waited for a gun permit to protect herself against that very assailant.
&#8220;Mansplain to these women,&#8221; the Second Amendment advocate added, before linking to eight more stories about women who defended themselves with guns.
&#8220;His whole argument presupposes that women are weak and will be overpowered, which isn’t supported by evidence,&#8221; Loesch told The Daily Wire. &#8220;To play devil’s advocate — shouldn’t then his position be to train and educate MORE women on usage?&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Mansplain to these women: <a href="https://t.co/ismXLXUqOQ">https://t.co/ismXLXUqOQ</a><a href="https://t.co/Pi9DIGuAN1">https://t.co/Pi9DIGuAN1</a><a href="https://t.co/SbG8QTI8DM">https://t.co/SbG8QTI8DM</a><a href="https://t.co/yrlj0YB1MP">https://t.co/yrlj0YB1MP</a><a href="https://t.co/wLI26qbtWo">https://t.co/wLI26qbtWo</a><a href="https://t.co/qoL01YH4Xn">https://t.co/qoL01YH4Xn</a><a href="https://t.co/PhpEO2S3Yb">https://t.co/PhpEO2S3Yb</a><a href="https://t.co/FR3a06ov1G">https://t.co/FR3a06ov1G</a><a href="https://t.co/hme04tyWTd">https://t.co/hme04tyWTd</a>
&mdash; Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) <a href="https://twitter.com/DLoesch/status/1532446394518319105?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 2, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Nadler did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Wire.

Screen Shot 2022-06-02 at 3.47.13 PM

Dana Loesch Brings Receipts After Nadler Claims Guns Don’t Increase Female Safety

Dana Loesch Fires Back After Democrat Claims Guns Don't Increase Female Safety

Dana Loesch

Gun Control

Guns

Second Amendment

A number of high-profile House Democrats may be forced to campaign against one another in New York&#8217;s Democratic primaries, under new House maps released Monday.
New York Special Master Jonathan Cervas released his maps for the New York State Senate and Congressional delegation. Cervas, a professor of political science at Carnegie Mellon University, was appointed by the New York State Supreme Court to oversee the redrawing of district maps, after the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-yorks-highest-court-strikes-down-democrats-gerrymandered-congressional-state-senate-maps">New York State Court of Appeals</a> struck down the maps as partisan gerrymanders. The newly-drawn Congressional maps create primary battlegrounds in two districts where high-profile incumbent Democrats will have to campaign against one another.
The first intra-party battleground is in New York&#8217;s 12th Congressional District. The seat is currently held by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, and encompasses the Upper East Side of Manhattan, as well as parts of Queens and Brooklyn. Maloney&#8217;s district currently borders New York&#8217;s 10th District, which encompasses the Upper West Side, as well as Midtown and Lower Manhattan, and parts of Brooklyn. The district is held by Rep. Jerry Nadler. But under the new maps, both Nadler and Maloney&#8217;s homes would be in the 12th District, putting them into a primary against one another.
Both Nadler and Maloney are powerful and longtime members of the Democratic Caucus. Nadler is the chairman of the powerful House Judiciary Committee, and is a member of the House Progressive Caucus. He won a special election in September 1992 to replace the late Rep. Ted Weiss, and was elected to a full term that November. Maloney was also elected to Congress in 1992. She is the chairwoman of the Oversight and Reform Committee, and the Vice Chair of the Joint Economic Committee. She is also a member of the Progressive Caucus.
Both Nadler and Maloney released statements to Twitter announcing their intention to run in the 12th District. “I believe these newly proposed lines by the Special Master violate the NYS constitutional requirements of keeping communities of interest together and keeping the cores of existing districts largely intact,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/JerryNadler/status/1526267248356237316?s=20&amp;t=1qWvOxxnX9dSMPdIKmt7dQ">Nadler</a> wrote on Twitter Monday. &#8220;However, provided that they become permanent, I very much look forward to representing the people of the newly created 12th District of New York.&#8221;
&#8220;I am proud to announce that I will be running to continue to represent the 12th Congressional District,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/CarolynBMaloney/status/1526271453531881479">Maloney</a> wrote. &#8220;A majority of the communities in the newly redrawn NY-12 are ones I have represented for years and to which I have deep ties.&#8221;
The second high-profile battleground is the 16th Congressional District. Cook Political Report House Editor <a href="https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/1526247612244013057">Dave Wasserman</a> reports that Rep. Mondaire Jones, who currently represents the 17th Congressional District, will be on a collision course with fellow Rep. Jamaal Bowman in the newly-drawn 16th. Jones serves on the Judiciary, Education, and Democratic Steering Committees, and is one of two openly gay black members of Congress. He is also the co-chair of the Congressional LGBT Equality Caucus. Bowman is the only male member of the &#8220;Squad&#8221; and is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. He also serves on the Education and Science Committees. Jones and Bowman are both members of the Congressional Black and Progressive Caucuses.

Albany

Proposed New York Congressional Maps Set Up Primary Battlegrounds For High-Profile Democrats

2022 Election

Congressional Budget Office (CBO)

Menu